<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title type="text">Newest articles and comments on The Sacramento Press written by latenite</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/user/latenite" />
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Where did the downtown population go?"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/77999/Excellent_article_William_Im_excited_by_the_possibility_of_more_downtown_residents_Q_Did_the_popula" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-77999</id>
    <updated>2013-01-08T18:59:59Z</updated>
    <published>2013-01-08T18:59:59Z</published>
    <content type="text">Excellent article, William. I'm excited by the possibility of more downtown residents.

Q: Did the population drop to "only 120" people in both Tract 9 and Tract 10 in 1970?

As to the challenge of selling/renting housing with less parking, this is not likely to a problem. With lower parking minimums, the market gets more choice it what it wants. They can still build the same parking as before, if there is actually demand for it. Do you think the city should have continued to effectively subsidize parking to lure more residents downtown? Or do you think we need parking maximums to restrict the market from over-supplying parking? I see that we need a better pedestrian environment, but as you say that comes largely from higher population density--which is served by lower parking density.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-08T18:59:59Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "The Hobbit - Frame rates, 3D/2D, and second thoughts."</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/77322/Just_chiming_in_to_say_some_people_will_really_enjoyed_the_movie_and_the_48_FPS_3D_format_I_certain" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-77322</id>
    <updated>2012-12-18T18:15:17Z</updated>
    <published>2012-12-18T18:15:17Z</published>
    <content type="text">Just chiming in to say some people will really enjoyed the movie, and the 48 FPS 3D format. I certainly did, though it did take getting used to. I didn't mind the length at all and actually was surprised 3hrs had passed already when the credits rolled.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-18T18:15:17Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Chat: Rebranding K Street to "The Kay""</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/75082/Im_all_for_efforts_to_improve_downtown_Rebranding_is_a_good_idea_and_Kay_is_cool_due_to_the_histori" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-75082</id>
    <updated>2012-10-23T20:30:26Z</updated>
    <published>2012-10-23T20:30:26Z</published>
    <content type="text">I'm all for efforts to improve downtown. Rebranding is a good idea, and "Kay" is cool due to the historic significance etc.

I have a problem with "The" Kay. Things named "The _____" are shortened versions of "The _____ Something". For example, people commonly refer to districts in San Francisco leaving off the "District", (The Mission, The Richmond, etc.). Also in Los Angeles (where freeways predate the interstate system, and were originally called The 101 Freeway, The 5 Freeway) they say The 101 and The 5. One more: "The Sacramento" refers to the river. No one says The Folsom Blvd, The Hollywood Way, etc. Why The K Street or The Kay Street?

So... let's call it "The Kay District", and then drop District if we are lazy or too cool. Don't leave District off of any signage or official branding--that's silly (at least until the brand is well established).

Or, just call it "Kay Street". That's simple and historically accurate too.

Please, let's not make the officially branding "The Kay".</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-23T20:30:26Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Krush Burger food truck to open first restaurant in Sacramento River District"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/73563/Im_looking_forward_to_this_Their_burgers_are_tops_and_it_will_be_easily_accessible_from_the_Two_Riv" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-73563</id>
    <updated>2012-09-14T21:43:40Z</updated>
    <published>2012-09-14T21:43:40Z</published>
    <content type="text">I'm looking forward to this. Their burgers are tops, and it will be easily accessible from the Two Rivers Bike Trail.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-14T21:43:40Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "More bike lanes coming to downtown"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/73215/Freeport_Id_also_love_to_see_a_way_for_bikes_through_the_Downtown_Plaza_however_it_gets_redone_That" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-73215</id>
    <updated>2012-09-05T22:48:33Z</updated>
    <published>2012-09-05T22:48:33Z</published>
    <content type="text">Freeport!  I'd also love to see a way for bikes through the Downtown Plaza however it gets redone. That would make a continuous bike route on one street from river to Alhambra.

Also bike boulevards: 13th Street, R Street, and O Street for a start. These are already pretty good routes, but could be excellent for beginner riders with some extra attention.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-05T22:48:33Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "More bike lanes coming to downtown"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/73214/O_Street_is_a_good_candidate_for_a_bicycle_boulevard_13th_Street_is_as_wellits_the_connection_acros" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-73214</id>
    <updated>2012-09-05T22:44:21Z</updated>
    <published>2012-09-05T22:44:21Z</published>
    <content type="text">O Street is a good candidate for a "bicycle boulevard". 13th Street is as well--it's the connection across Capitol Park. Both of these streets already don't have much through traffic.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-05T22:44:21Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "La Valentia; Affordable Housing with an Eco-Conscience"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67907/I_think_being_at_the_light_rail_station_is_one_of_the_best_things_about_this_project_Having_lived_b" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67907</id>
    <updated>2012-05-16T00:02:28Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-16T00:02:28Z</published>
    <content type="text">I think being at the light rail station is one of the best things about this project. Having lived by light rail at R/24th, the crossing gates are by far the loudest part. This location doesn't have gates, and I think many residents won't have a problem with the noise.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T00:02:28Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Bike theft, Its flourishing and prospering in Sacramento"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/63400/I_recommend_checking_out_this_humorous_and_informative_video_on_proper_bike_locking_from_NYC_Street" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-63400</id>
    <updated>2012-02-07T20:19:16Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-07T20:19:16Z</published>
    <content type="text">I recommend checking out this humorous and informative video on proper bike locking from NYC Streetfilms.

http://www.streetfilms.org/hal-grades-your-bike-locking/</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-07T20:19:16Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Sacramento velodrome project: Pedal fast, turn left"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/62080/If_you_want_to_get_excited_about_velodrome_racing_check_out_the_truestory_film_The_Flying_Scotsman" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-62080</id>
    <updated>2012-01-10T17:50:40Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-10T17:50:40Z</published>
    <content type="text">If you want to get excited about velodrome racing, check out the true-story film The Flying Scotsman.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-10T17:50:40Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Expanded bike share program to launch early next year"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/61439/Im_glad_the_program_will_be_expanded_The_bigger_the_system_the_more_usable_There_need_to_be_station" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-61439</id>
    <updated>2011-12-17T17:59:49Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-17T17:59:49Z</published>
    <content type="text">I'm glad the program will be expanded. The bigger the system, the more usable.

There need to be stations close to the LRT and Amtrak--especially if this is seen as a "last mile" solution. (Why isn't Zip Car at Sac Valley Station yet??)</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-17T17:59:49Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "City supports high speed rail for the north state"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/61289/Everyone_keeps_making_this_assumption_that_HSR_needs_to_directly_pay_for_it_self_through_the_fare_b" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-61289</id>
    <updated>2011-12-13T20:34:43Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-13T20:34:43Z</published>
    <content type="text">Everyone keeps making this assumption that HSR needs to directly pay for it self through the fare box. This is a red herring. How many new freeway lanes are directly paying for themselves? We need to remember that improving the transportation network (trains, roads, air, and so on) spurs economic development, so HSR can have big return on investment.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-13T20:34:43Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Gelateria opens at 19th and Capitol"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/56448/Its_really_neat_to_see_a_little_dessert_district_growing_up_around_there_Within_about_a_block_and_a" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-56448</id>
    <updated>2011-09-01T17:06:40Z</updated>
    <published>2011-09-01T17:06:40Z</published>
    <content type="text">It's really neat to see a little dessert district growing up around there. Within about a block and a half one can get dessert at Crepeville, Trey B Cakes, Ginger Elizabeth's, Yogurtagogo, and now Devine Gelateria. Now all we need is a pie place, they could do meat pies and dessert pies like Z Pie in Placerville.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-01T17:06:40Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Ending 15 years of debate in El Dorado County"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/56290/So_with_the_Shingle_Plan_the_trail_will_never_be_continuous_from_Folsom_to_Placerville_Whats_the_po" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-56290</id>
    <updated>2011-08-30T19:17:51Z</updated>
    <published>2011-08-30T19:17:51Z</published>
    <content type="text">So with the Shingle Plan, the trail will never be continuous from Folsom to Placerville? What's the point of a 9 mile rail corridor? Obviously having both rail and trail between Folsom and Placerville would be great, but having one each for part of the way is kind of silly.

What are these "speeders"? Are they like private mini-locomotives? Will there be no excursion rail option for the public?</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-30T19:17:51Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Big things underway at Sacramento Railyards"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/54805/William_do_you_know_if_there_will_be_additional_pedestrianbicycle_access_tunnels_to_access_the_rail" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-54805</id>
    <updated>2011-08-09T16:36:14Z</updated>
    <published>2011-08-09T16:36:14Z</published>
    <content type="text">William, do you know if there will be additional pedestrian/bicycle access tunnels to access the rail yards development--not just the platforms? It would be a shame if they skipped on this and made everyone walk up over on the 5th and 6th street bridges.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-09T16:36:14Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "K Street now - A photo essay"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/45297/Great_job_with_the_photos_and_descriptions_of_each_buildings_past_and_future_Im_excited_about_this_" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-45297</id>
    <updated>2011-02-08T19:08:06Z</updated>
    <published>2011-02-08T19:08:06Z</published>
    <content type="text">Great job with the photos and descriptions of each buildings past and future!

I'm excited about this project. I really like the aesthetics of D&amp;S's previous downtown/midtown projects. I think we just might be ready for the 500 capacity music venue by the time it opens now that we are starting to actually have sold out shows at Harlow's. It should fit nicely between Harlow's and Ace of Spades (Empire) size-wise.

@RPH if only we could move I-5! ...or deck over it at least.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-08T19:08:06Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Capital Stage to drop anchor on J Street"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/45296/Five_blocks_along_a_great_walking_street_like_J_is_not_far_Other_venues_on_the_street_have_the_same" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-45296</id>
    <updated>2011-02-08T18:54:03Z</updated>
    <published>2011-02-08T18:54:03Z</published>
    <content type="text">Five blocks along a great walking street like J, is not far. Other venues on the street have the same parking situation (only on-street or public lots several blocks away), and they do fine. It's good that the theater is trying to accommodate, and that the city will work with them on this, but the city should do away with minimum parking standards altogether. There are about 4 homes for every car in america already.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-08T18:54:03Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Green Sacramento closing February 5th"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/45294/Any_clarification_on_the_dates_Closing_on_the_5th_but_having_the_sale_Friday_and_Saturdaywhich_Fri_" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-45294</id>
    <updated>2011-02-08T18:23:06Z</updated>
    <published>2011-02-08T18:23:06Z</published>
    <content type="text">Any clarification on the dates? Closing on the 5th, but having the sale Friday and Saturday...which Fri and Sat?</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-08T18:23:06Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Money woes pile up for Railyards developer"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/34156/A_17_million_transitoriented_development_grant_is_being_used_to_build_the_Fifth_Street_bridge_The_t" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-34156</id>
    <updated>2010-08-03T19:44:29Z</updated>
    <published>2010-08-03T19:44:29Z</published>
    <content type="text">"A $17 million transit-oriented development grant is being used to build the Fifth Street bridge."

The transit-oriented development funds are being used to build a bridge for cars?  The various bus lines serving the multi-modal center will probably use the bridge too, but this seems like a disconnect.  I don't want to hear about a lack of funding for features that will enhance access to alternative modes of transportation within the Railyards.  That said, I'm very glad that the bridge work is continuing, as it's necessary to keep the project moving forward.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-03T19:44:29Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Kupros to open in Midtown"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/33615/No_TVs_Duck_confit_Reuben_I_hope_they_have_plenty_of_vegetarian_options_as_well_That_ceiling_looks_" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-33615</id>
    <updated>2010-07-27T17:09:05Z</updated>
    <published>2010-07-27T17:09:05Z</published>
    <content type="text">No TVs!
Duck confit Reuben!
I hope they have plenty of vegetarian options as well.
That ceiling looks great.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-27T17:09:05Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Another one bites the dust..."</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/3987/A_new_Peets_Coffee_just_opened_a_couple_of_blocks_from_there_Coincidence_Same_old_story_of_the_nati" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-3987</id>
    <updated>2009-02-27T20:29:53Z</updated>
    <published>2009-02-27T20:29:53Z</published>
    <content type="text">A new Peet's Coffee just opened a couple of blocks from there.  Coincidence?  Same old story of the national brand moving in on the little guy.

+1 for a shop at R and 27th.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-27T20:29:53Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "Road blocks in Downtown"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/3986/I_really_appreciate_the_partial_closures_They_allow_bikes_and_pedestrians_to_take_the_shortest_path" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-3986</id>
    <updated>2009-02-27T20:25:14Z</updated>
    <published>2009-02-27T20:25:14Z</published>
    <content type="text">I really appreciate the partial closures.  They allow bikes and pedestrians to take the shortest path, while encouraging drivers to keep to J, L, 16th, 28th, etc.

Also, the City finally improved the H Street/21st Street closure by allowing left and right turns there, instead of just right, followed by another right at I Street/21st Street.</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-27T20:25:14Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "K Street Mall Needs Street Performers"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/3984/Its_currently_illegal_to_do_street_performance_on_K_Street_right_Its_also_illegal_to_ride_a_bike_on" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-3984</id>
    <updated>2009-02-27T20:06:43Z</updated>
    <published>2009-02-27T20:06:43Z</published>
    <content type="text">It's currently illegal to do street performance on K Street, right?  It's also illegal to ride a bike on K Street.  When is the City going to let us use the public space they went through the trouble of creating by closing it to cars?</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-27T20:06:43Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">latenite on "City To Close Historic Berry Hotel"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/3983/This_really_is_infuriating_Has_the_City_made_any_plans_for_the_supposed_relocation_public_Its_sad_t" />
    <author>
      <name>latenite</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-3983</id>
    <updated>2009-02-27T19:59:07Z</updated>
    <published>2009-02-27T19:59:07Z</published>
    <content type="text">This really is infuriating!  Has the City made any plans for the supposed relocation public?  It's sad that anyone has to live by the river, and the number of people doing so is increasing all the time.  I would be surprised if there is any alternative for the 50 people being kicked out of the Berry.  I guess the City's plan is to not provide any new housing and just pickup after the folks at the tent city (as they have been doing).  I'd imagine it would be much easier to get/keep a job while living in an SRO compared to a tent!

It would have been awesome to see the Berry as a budget hotel / SRO, like they used to be, and like several other project in other cities like the 500 West Hotel in San Diego.  Got to stay there a while back.  Great project.  http://www.500westhotelsd.com/</content>
    <dc:creator>latenite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-27T19:59:07Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

