Tag Cloud
|
Elite Contributor
William Burg
GenderMale OccupationHistorian NeighborhoodWinn Park |
Personal Tag Cloud |
|
About MePresident, Sacramento Old City Association. Vice-President, Sacramento County Historical Society. Treasurer, Sacramento Heritage, Inc. |
||
10 comments featured on the front page
10 front page articles
10 articles featured on the front page
Contest Winner
Won an official Sacramento Press contest
Front page article
One article featured on the front page
Front page comment
One comment featured on the front page
Yesterday, Sacramento Press contributor Tony Sheppard challenged fellow readers and contributors to share what they would do with a theoretical $250 million, in a way that might bring a greater return than a basketball arena. I started writing a comment but, as often happens, it ended up being an article in itself. So here it is. Step 1: Build the Downtown/Riverfront Streetcar: $130 Million. Streetcars are often called "development-oriented transit" because they promote growth of transit-oriented neighborhoods along their right-of-way. Portland is the canonical example of a new city streetcar line spurring growth in the "Pearl" District, a mostly vacant industrial district until installa
In order to build a downtown arena, Sacramentans will have to give up that which they hold dearest: free parking. The funding plan requires expansion of on-street metering downtown, and will increase parking rates at city lots. The arena’s presence dramatically changes the economics of private parking lots, in ways that threaten the main funding source for the arena. By releasing the term sheet at the absolute last minute, on a Saturday night, followed by a Monday city holiday and a crashed City of Sacramento website, the opportunity for public review is so limited that it is effectively nonexistent. Three days is simply not enough time for a detailed look at the term sheet, but it was su
On Monday, March 18, Turn Downtown Around presents a Public Forum, a discussion of how downtown Sacramento reached its current state, what its situation is today, and what can be done by regular citizens to create positive change in our urban core. I was asked to talk about how we got here. If we want to turn downtown around, this implies that, at some point, downtown Sacramento was going in the right direction. How did that Sacramento differ from the one we know today, and how can we recapture some of that spirit? What lessons can we learn from the past--both the mistakes to avoid, and the useful elements that we can use today? [Note: Read the live blog of the forum as it happened here.]
During the late 19th and early 20th century, American cities showed their stuff by holding elaborate fairs. They showcased the host city with specially designed fairgrounds and elaborate exhibits. First popular in the mid-19th century, they reached new heights with the Chicago Columbian Exposition in 1893. National in scope, these fairs featured exhibits from around the country. Trends in architecture, agriculture, transportation, entertainment, technology and urban planning were set at these fairs, and a successful fair could bring great honor, investment and migration to the host city. In 1904 and 1905, two separate but related fairs were held in St. Louis, Missouri and Portland, Oregon.
Join Sacramento Heritage, Inc. on Saturday, February 9 for a "Dessert Tour." This two-hour stroll through Midtown Sacramento's residential and business district will visit architectural treasures, share stories of the city's past, and include delicious desserts from four of Midtown's most popular purveyors of sweets. Proceeds benefit Sacramento Heritage Inc., a 501(c)3 nonprofit dedicated to protecting and maintaining Sacramento's architectural treasures. For fans of historic architecture, the tour will feature a look at Midtown Sacramento's diverse architectural styles, including 19th century Italianate and Queen Anne, early 20th century Craftsman and revival styles, and even Mid-Century
That just leads to a race to the bottom--the mad scramble for sales tax revenue, reinforced by California's lopsided property tax system, causes all sorts of self-defeating behavior like this--cities sacrifice their well-being and citywide priorities in pursuit of sales tax in what they perceive as a zero-sum game, instead of focusing on the sort of planning decisions and land uses that will increase the size of the overall economy.
You're already paying for those bags, they're just hidden in the purchase price. How did people deal with pet poop before the advent of the disposable plastic grocery bag?
Yes, but Mayor Johnson's wife's nonprofit got millions of dollars in donations from Wal-Mart, and they have to return the favor somehow.
This ordinance does not prevent grocery stores from opening in downtown Sacramento. It's a citywide ordinance specific to big-box superstores, not grocery stores or smaller businesses--or even fairly large ones, like non-superstore Target big-box stores.
Conversation about: Proposal to make it easier for big-box megastores to open in Sacramento takes a step forward
It's not a zero-sum game, but some people assume that if a sales tax dollar is spent in a neighboring municipality, it must be a sales tax dollar that their municipality is losing as a result. Limiting big-boxes doesn't necessarily drain sales tax dollars--it means stores that aren't big-box stores have more incentive to set up here--and less reason to set up in nearby cities. More local business has a more positive effect on local economies, because more of that money stays in the local economy instead of filtering out of the city to the corporate level.