<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title type="text">Newest comments on The Sacramento Press written by JWS</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/user/JWS" />
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "DIY urbanism –  open forum downtown on March 18 "</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/80468/I_think_some_people_are_being_disingenuous_here_TDA_did_in_fact_start_out_by_framing_the_issue_as_a" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-80468</id>
    <updated>2013-03-12T22:05:44Z</updated>
    <published>2013-03-12T22:05:44Z</published>
    <content type="text">I think some people are being disingenuous here. TDA did in fact start out by framing the issue as a generational problem. Sorry but  they started the blame game that they now insist is off limits. I agree it should have never been the focus. And hopefully everyone can move on. Try and listen instead of being all defensive and self-righteous about it. Chalk it as a learning experience. Hey I wish the group luck and hope they can accomplish something good cuz dtwn needs a lot of help.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-12T22:05:44Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Tour of $22 million fixer-upper | Photos"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/72590/Well_it_sounds_like_he_knows_more_than_you_do_considering_he_was_able_to_list_several_things_beside" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-72590</id>
    <updated>2012-08-20T20:07:45Z</updated>
    <published>2012-08-20T20:07:45Z</published>
    <content type="text">Well it sounds like he knows more than you do considering he was able to list several things besides paint. I don't think he said he was excited about a coat of paint- that's your issue. Besides you only cut &amp; pasted a statement made by someone else regarding the foreclosure. How is that listing two facts? As for the foreclosure, it won't mean demise of the mall if that's what you are hoping for. I'm just wondering what you expect the new owners to do in the first couple of weeks. 

I guess I just don't understand why you are complaining, apart from that's what your gang does best. The rest of us see this as a positive thing.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-20T20:07:45Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Midtown Second Saturday pilot parking program canned"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/72585/Nah_the_overkill_parking_restriction_around_Orphan_is_ridiculous_too" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-72585</id>
    <updated>2012-08-20T19:32:45Z</updated>
    <published>2012-08-20T19:32:45Z</published>
    <content type="text">Nah the overkill parking restriction around Orphan is ridiculous too.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-20T19:32:45Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Midtown shooting death sparks response from neighbors"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/72584/Come_on_Ben_at_2_am_in_the_morning_outside_of_a_bar_it_doesnt_take_much_of_an_imagination_to_assume" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-72584</id>
    <updated>2012-08-20T19:27:52Z</updated>
    <published>2012-08-20T19:27:52Z</published>
    <content type="text">Come on Ben at 2 am in the morning outside of a bar -it doesn't take much of an imagination to assume alcohol was invloved. It's pretty reasonable assuption if you ask me.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-20T19:27:52Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day: Anti-gay marriage eat-in draws Sacramento crowd "</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/71921/Theres_something_sleazy_about_the_way_the_Christians_handled_themselves_in_all_this_I_dont_think_mo" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-71921</id>
    <updated>2012-08-03T20:51:31Z</updated>
    <published>2012-08-03T20:51:31Z</published>
    <content type="text">There's something sleazy about the way the Christians handled themselves in all this. I don't think most gay people were shocked or outraged. I mean haven't they heard all this before? It was when the political left and right got into the middle of it that all hell broke loose. But the way that Christians went out of their way to support a junk food chain over this issue is shameful.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-03T20:51:31Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Next Sac Press Live: William Burg on 'What's Killing Sacramento's Suburbs' and the downtown economy "</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/71479/What_neighborhood_are_you_trying_build_in" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-71479</id>
    <updated>2012-07-26T00:35:31Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-26T00:35:31Z</published>
    <content type="text">What neighborhood are you trying build in?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-26T00:35:31Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Occupy Sacramento protests proposed law for City Hall"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/71425/Yeah_Ive_gone_to_city_hall_By_destroying_city_property_the_once_beautiful_landscaping_do_you_mean_a" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-71425</id>
    <updated>2012-07-25T15:43:23Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-25T15:43:23Z</published>
    <content type="text">Yeah I've gone to city hall. By 'destroying city property' , the " once beautiful landscaping" - do you mean a small patch of grass? Sorry I don't think a small patch of grass is worth more than my civil liberties. Sorry I don't believe people when they say they support 1st Amend rights and then agree to destroy those rights. They have no shame and are complete hypocrites. Do you feel the same about the people who 'occupy' Chavez Park and have done so for years? Do you feel the same about the people there throwing their trash around and urinating in the park?  What about the people who destroyed the newly seeded grass during the Friday Night Concerts? I am more offended that my tax dollars went to pay for the 'poop monument' across the street.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-25T15:43:23Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "POLL: Parking to panhandlers – What's killing downtown?"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/71077/You_are_exaggerating_M_I_am_on_K_Street_nearly_everyday_and_I_have_never_seen_someone_throw_up_once" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-71077</id>
    <updated>2012-07-18T16:08:10Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-18T16:08:10Z</published>
    <content type="text">You are exaggerating M@. I am on K Street nearly everyday and I have never seen someone throw up once let alone 10x. Tonight I went out to dinner at 18h and Capitol and found a parking space less than half a block away from were I was going. Some people just have no luck. Don't blame everyone else.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-18T16:08:10Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "A skeptic's perspective: Isaac Gonzalez on Sacramento's arena saga"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70674/Why_should_it_cost_so_much_money_Its_a_racket" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70674</id>
    <updated>2012-07-10T16:13:17Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-10T16:13:17Z</published>
    <content type="text">Why should it cost so much money? It's a racket.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-10T16:13:17Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Concert review: Lyle Lovett LIVE!"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70673/This_has_been_a_complaint_against_Sacramento_audiences_for_years_Not_sure_why_we_are_not_very_demon" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70673</id>
    <updated>2012-07-10T16:03:49Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-10T16:03:49Z</published>
    <content type="text">This has been a complaint against Sacramento audiences for years. Not sure why we are not very demonstrative. It must be cultural because people in other cities are not so sedate. Lack of appreciation for talent is a real problem. Maybe it's self-consciousness? Maybe they think their home watching on the TV?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-10T16:03:49Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Think Big considers possible Major League Baseball stadium for Sacramento"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70671/This_I_agree_with" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70671</id>
    <updated>2012-07-10T15:47:55Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-10T15:47:55Z</published>
    <content type="text">This I agree with.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-10T15:47:55Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Think Big considers possible Major League Baseball stadium for Sacramento"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70670/Rhys_02_of_course_WeSac_would_take_a_major_league_team_over_a_minor_one_As_for_WeSac_settling_for_p" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70670</id>
    <updated>2012-07-10T15:45:34Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-10T15:45:34Z</published>
    <content type="text">@Rhys 02 of course WeSac would take a major league team over a minor one. As for WeSac "settling" for people going across the river to dine and party -- what do you think they do now? Besides they wouldn't have any of their development without Sacramento in the first place. Maybe it's not just the mayor who lives in a separate reality. 

Let's not get silly regarding WeSac' recent developments. They are not 'running rings' around Sacramento as the Sacramento haters like to believe. It's just that their development is far more dramatic/noticeable becuase its a small town. And again they have that development precisely because of their proximity to central Sacramento.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-10T15:45:34Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Think Big considers possible Major League Baseball stadium for Sacramento"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70669/Regionalism_in_the_Sacramento_Region_has_always_been_something_of_a_joke_so_i_wouldnt_be_worried_ab" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70669</id>
    <updated>2012-07-10T15:29:24Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-10T15:29:24Z</published>
    <content type="text">Regionalism in the Sacramento Region has always been something of a joke so i wouldn't be worried about alienating our so-called "partners". And as you righty pointed out regionalism here only means Sacramento County and WeSac is in Yolo County. All these other so-called partners feed off Sacramento and would not exist without Sacramento. Cities like Roseville have shown their contempt for regional corporation for years -if you want to complain about this sort of thing go after them.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-10T15:29:24Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Possibility of MLB stadium for downtown railyards"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70657/Meh" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70657</id>
    <updated>2012-07-10T02:41:04Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-10T02:41:04Z</published>
    <content type="text">Meh</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-10T02:41:04Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Possibility of MLB stadium for downtown railyards"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70656/Jim_is_exactly_right_You_cant_just_compare_population" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70656</id>
    <updated>2012-07-10T02:40:35Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-10T02:40:35Z</published>
    <content type="text">Jim is exactly right. You can't just compare population.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-10T02:40:35Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Possibility of MLB stadium for downtown railyards"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70655/Agreed" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70655</id>
    <updated>2012-07-10T02:39:15Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-10T02:39:15Z</published>
    <content type="text">Agreed</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-10T02:39:15Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "POLL: What’s next at the downtown railyards? Readers weigh in"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70624/Lets_go_with_the_very_good_plan_we_already_have_If_we_want_to_use_parking_garage_money_on_anything_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70624</id>
    <updated>2012-07-09T16:23:59Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-09T16:23:59Z</published>
    <content type="text">Let's go with the very good plan we already have. If we want to use 'parking garage money' on anything how about making improvements to the existing core that will get the owners of the Railyards moving on developing it as planned. One thing we could do is buy the Westfield Plaza (at a discounted price since it's in such poor shape) and de-mall it -- open it up and make it look like a real street again (san the cars) and add housing - something like San Jose's Santna Row.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-09T16:23:59Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "POLL: What’s next at the downtown railyards? Readers weigh in"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70623/I_dont_think_people_are_as_antibusiness_as_you_want_to_believe_they_are_I_think_its_more_about_what" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70623</id>
    <updated>2012-07-09T16:13:48Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-09T16:13:48Z</published>
    <content type="text">I don't think people are as anti-business as you want to believe they are. I think it's more about what is appropriate for the site. Putting a Home Depot or Bass Pro Shop in the Railyards would be a foolish waste and make us even more of joke. Thank goodness there are people who have higher ambitions.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-09T16:13:48Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Possibility of MLB stadium for downtown railyards"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70622/I_wish_this_was_a_joke_The_mayor_should_explain_why_he_wants_to_chuck_the_plans_that_the_City_and_r" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70622</id>
    <updated>2012-07-09T16:03:42Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-09T16:03:42Z</published>
    <content type="text">I wish this was a joke. The mayor should explain why he wants to chuck the plans that the City and residents have spent a lot of time, energy and money developing. I don't understand how these 'Think Big' clowns can come in and completely change the direction/focus of the Railyards. They think they have found a way to wring money out of the publicly-financed parking garages and now are looking for ways to spend that money in order to line their own pockets. I would like to know who the 72 members of Think Big are.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-09T16:03:42Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "POLL: What’s next at the downtown railyards? Readers weigh in"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/70492/There_was_a_canal_element_included_in_the_early_plans_but_locals_with_a_fetish_for_the_gridiron_put" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-70492</id>
    <updated>2012-07-06T01:14:03Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-06T01:14:03Z</published>
    <content type="text">There was a canal element included in the early plans but locals with a fetish for the gridiron put the kibosh on it. Besides it  did seemed a little cheesy. Don't think gas stations are really thinking 'big'. It should not be about catering to folks from Rose Ville or downtown workers but about ADDiNG downtown residents. Seeking corporate HQ's seems rather 1989. Creating a branch of UC Davis would be about the smartest move we could make - drawing in and keeping young talent and engery.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-06T01:14:03Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Sacramento Church Reinvents Itself by Attracting K-12 School and Buying Back Land for Pennies on the Dollar"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69979/Whats_with_this_local_real_estate_guy_using_his_companys_church_related_deals_to_post_ads_in_the_fo" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69979</id>
    <updated>2012-06-24T15:38:15Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-24T15:38:15Z</published>
    <content type="text">What's with this local real estate guy using his company's church related deals to post ads in the form of a "news article"? Having been indoctrinated by referenced church I am none to pleased that they are going to get to continue to poison the minds of impressible youth.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-24T15:38:15Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Gun store coming to Midtown"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69606/What_are_you_smoking_Hum_Fairy_Skyscrapers_vs_Fairy_Gun_Shops" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69606</id>
    <updated>2012-06-16T15:26:23Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-16T15:26:23Z</published>
    <content type="text">What are you smoking? Hum. Fairy Skyscrapers vs Fairy Gun Shops.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-16T15:26:23Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Gun store coming to Midtown"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69605/Oh_brother_Gun_shops_fine_Location_not_fine_See_the_difference_Nope_I_guess_you_dont" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69605</id>
    <updated>2012-06-16T06:16:44Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-16T06:16:44Z</published>
    <content type="text">Oh brother. Gun shops -fine. Location -not fine. See the difference? Nope I guess you don't.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-16T06:16:44Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Gun store coming to Midtown"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69591/Or_you_can_look_to_Canada_Sweden_France_Australia_UK_Japan_etc_which_dont_have_our_holy_2nd_Amendme" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69591</id>
    <updated>2012-06-16T06:16:06Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-16T06:16:06Z</published>
    <content type="text">Or you can look to Canada, Sweden, France, Australia, UK, Japan, etc.... which  don't have our holy 2nd Amendment and yet some how they are much safer than the USA. Guns clealy do not make a society safer. And real men don't need guns to make them feel safe.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-16T06:16:06Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Gun store coming to Midtown"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69602/Wow_outright_name_calling_Really_I_thought_Sac_Press_doesnt_allow_that" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69602</id>
    <updated>2012-06-16T05:01:48Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-16T05:01:48Z</published>
    <content type="text">Wow outright name calling. Really? I thought Sac Press doesn't allow that?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-16T05:01:48Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Grand Opening of Miller Park Arts Complex Set for Saturday, June 23; New Home of  La Raza Galería Posada "</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69592/Great_to_see_this_especially_at_Miller_Park" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69592</id>
    <updated>2012-06-15T22:00:45Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-15T22:00:45Z</published>
    <content type="text">Great to see this -especially at Miller Park.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-15T22:00:45Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "PHOTOS: Hundreds celebrate start of light rail Green Line from downtown to River District"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69590/Nice_station_Im_assuming_that_the_green_line_is_a_completely_different_train_judging_from_the_paint" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69590</id>
    <updated>2012-06-15T21:52:56Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-15T21:52:56Z</published>
    <content type="text">Nice station. I'm assuming that the green line is a completely different train judging from the paint job and not an extension of the gold line? So where does it start and are there any other stops? This  'article' is short on details.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-15T21:52:56Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Gun store coming to Midtown"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69586/Some_people_can_do_both_He_probably_far_more_engaged_with_his_neighborhood_than_you_are" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69586</id>
    <updated>2012-06-15T21:22:40Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-15T21:22:40Z</published>
    <content type="text">Some people can do both. He probably far more engaged with his neighborhood than you are.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-15T21:22:40Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Trio: a new downtown Sacramento restaurant à la Dean and Deluca"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69249/Your_loss_Theres_a_lot_you_never_see_and_you_never_seem_to_really_know_whats_going_in_your_own_city" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69249</id>
    <updated>2012-06-11T02:20:50Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-11T02:20:50Z</published>
    <content type="text">Your loss. There's a lot you never see and you never seem to really know what's going in your own city. But i bet you can tell us the latest happenings in San Francisco. Because you are just so cool and hip.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-11T02:20:50Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Where do City Council District 4 candidates stand on election day?"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69055/Of_course_theres_no_way_of_knowing_that_you_are_NOT_the_guy_dss89_googled_and_you_are_lying_about_t" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69055</id>
    <updated>2012-06-06T18:32:30Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-06T18:32:30Z</published>
    <content type="text">Of course there's no way of knowing that you are NOT the guy dss89 googled and you are lying about that now. But that is beside the point. So let's take a look at the issues you raised. Considering that Steve works for one of the largest biotech companies its not hard to imagine why he would get support from people he knows within the pharmaceutical industry. But since a city councilman has very little chance of voting on matters that concern pharmaceutical companies I don't see how that should matter. I would personally rather have someone who is involved in a future growth industry  than a boring  'local boy' who just happens to be well-connected. I want change not the same old thing. As for being for or against the arena deal. Since I changed my mind on that one as the details came out to me this shows an open mind rather than one that is already made up before all the fact are presented. And so what Steve has only lived "downtown" for only 2 years (to sub-urbanites and SacBee all of the grid is downtown)? That's 2 years longer than any of the other candidates. All the others live in the suburbs south of central city.  I don't know anything about 'fishy loans' and you probably don't either but I do know that Yee and not Hansen is supported by big local developers and labor groups and most likely the mayor though I don't believe he officially supported any candidate. So you can twist any 'facts' to suit your bias or just make things up.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-06T18:32:30Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "How Hansen rallied his base on election day in the District 4"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69070/What_is_a_bung_Just_because_you_got_a_few_flyers_in_the_snail_mail_a_phone_book_worth_is_a_tad_bit_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69070</id>
    <updated>2012-06-06T18:23:14Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-06T18:23:14Z</published>
    <content type="text">What is a bung? Just because you got a few flyers in the snail mail (a phone book worth is a tad bit of an exaggeration) doesn't mean his campaign didn't use social media rather it probably means you don't use social media and therefore have no clue what was done.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-06T18:23:14Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Where do City Council District 4 candidates stand on election day?"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69043/How_would_a_Pocket_Area_GOPer_know_whats_good_for_D4_Really_come_on_You_only_support_her_because_he" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69043</id>
    <updated>2012-06-06T16:18:37Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-06T16:18:37Z</published>
    <content type="text">How would a Pocket (Area) GOPer know what's good for D4? Really come on. You only support her because her philosophical views align more closely with yours and has nothing to do with her good grasp of the issues concerning a large chunk of the district.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-06T16:18:37Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Where do City Council District 4 candidates stand on election day?"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69058/Hum_In_most_cases_I_would_agree_that_outside_money_is_not_as_good_as_inside_money_But_not_in_Sacram" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69058</id>
    <updated>2012-06-06T16:13:29Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-06T16:13:29Z</published>
    <content type="text">Hum. In most cases I would agree that outside money is not as good as inside money. But not in Sacramento. There is just too small of a group of moneyed people here and the relationships are a bit too tight to not have cronyism. That has been Sacramento's problem for decades.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-06T16:13:29Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Where do City Council District 4 candidates stand on election day?"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69046/Evak_wins_the_prediction_prize_And_on_Yee_I_can_agree_with_my_Pocket_Area_GOPer_friend" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69046</id>
    <updated>2012-06-06T16:07:40Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-06T16:07:40Z</published>
    <content type="text">Evak wins the prediction prize!  And on Yee I can agree with my Pocket Area GOPer friend.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-06T16:07:40Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Where do City Council District 4 candidates stand on election day?"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69057/Haha_I_assume_from_your_screen_name_that_you_live_in_the_Pocket_Area_and_are_a_Republican_If_thats_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69057</id>
    <updated>2012-06-06T16:06:28Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-06T16:06:28Z</published>
    <content type="text">Haha. I assume from your screen name that you live in the Pocket Area and are a Republican. If that's true how the heck would know what's good for D.4? If I had any doubts your endorsement would make certain I didn't vote for Newton. Luckily people in my district are a smart bunch and didn't fall for her 'neighborhood voice' bull.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-06T16:06:28Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "How Hansen rallied his base on election day in the District 4"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69054/Congrats_to_Steve_and_everyone_who_worked_on_his_campaign_Now_that_the_Land_Park_vote_is_not_split_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69054</id>
    <updated>2012-06-06T15:25:39Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-06T15:25:39Z</published>
    <content type="text">Congrats to Steve and everyone who worked on his campaign. Now that the Land Park vote is not split it will be even harder to overcome the political weight and family connections and developer and labor money that will be going into Yee's campaign, but it can be done. Unfortunately, I think the hardest work for Steve's campaign is still ahead.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-06T15:25:39Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "East Sac Give Back - Bringing Communities Together"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69050/Maintaining_the_myth_that_the_poor_deserve_to_be_poor_because_of_their_actions_morality_or_mindset_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69050</id>
    <updated>2012-06-06T15:11:48Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-06T15:11:48Z</published>
    <content type="text">Maintaining the myth that the poor deserve to be poor because of their actions, morality, or mindset and the wealthy deserve to be wealthy because of theirs helps to justify people's prejudices and lack of compassion. I'm think of a young women I know who grew up in a wealthy family in East Sacramento. Not so bright poor thing. She's abused drugs and alcohol in the past and now she is unmarried and pregnant. She 'works' but only because of her family connections and support can that girl make enough to live in East Sacramento and not in the 'ghetto'. 

I wish you all the best in your endeavors. Giving back or paying it forward is always a good thing.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-06T15:11:48Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Where do City Council District 4 candidates stand on election day?"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/69047/Not_a_very_good_prognosticator_are_ya_Thats_OK_neither_am_I" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-69047</id>
    <updated>2012-06-06T10:32:54Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-06T10:32:54Z</published>
    <content type="text">Not a very good prognosticator are ya? That's OK neither am I.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-06T10:32:54Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Land Park and Midtown – How will one candidate represent both?"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/68810/Most_of_Land_Park_has_different_issue_than_the_central_neighborhoods_It_would_be_far_more_effective" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-68810</id>
    <updated>2012-06-01T09:54:56Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-01T09:54:56Z</published>
    <content type="text">Most of Land Park has different issue than the central neighborhoods. It would be far more effective to have council members that do not have to be familiar with and juggle so many diverse issues. Unfortunately, effective governance and fair representation was not what the redistricting was about - at least from the stand point of the powers that be.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-01T09:54:56Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Downtown Denny's closes, will become Perkos Café"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/68515/Do_we_really_need_a_Dennys_anywhere_I_think_not_Dennys_was_once_cool_when_it_served_real_diner_food" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-68515</id>
    <updated>2012-05-26T04:06:51Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-26T04:06:51Z</published>
    <content type="text">Do we really need a Denny's anywhere? I think not. Denny's was once cool when it served real diner food in a decor of orange starbursts instead of corporate geriatric cafeteria food it serves now.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-26T04:06:51Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Plan to restrict Second Saturday street parking causes stir in Midtown "</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/68493/I_agree_with_a_lot_of_your_points_but_number_4_really_only_speaks_to_a_small_minority_of_us_Most_pe" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-68493</id>
    <updated>2012-05-25T23:13:14Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-25T23:13:14Z</published>
    <content type="text">I agree with a lot of your points but number 4  really only speaks to a small minority of us.  Most people in Midtown wouldn't want to live anywhere else in Sacramento. Well maybe a big home in Land Park or East Sac if they could afford it but most really like living here -even if we are sometimes annoyed by our unique (to the rest of Sacramento) set of problems.

 Just because people here want to make their neighborhood  better doesn't mean they are unhappy living here. Just the opposite. And some of us enjoy hashing out the issues that concern us all instead of sitting on our collective lotus blossoms spouting high-sounding philosophy which basically just  amounts to the old 'love it as it is or  leave it' nonsense.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T23:13:14Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Plan to restrict Second Saturday street parking causes stir in Midtown "</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/68492/Casey_Mark_and_William_are_all_right_I_think_most_Midtownies_walk_or_ride_their_bike_to_the_barsclu" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-68492</id>
    <updated>2012-05-25T23:08:10Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-25T23:08:10Z</published>
    <content type="text">Casey, Mark and William are all right. I think most Midtownies walk or ride their bike  to the bars/clubs. But the problem is with the people (residents or visitors) walking home or to their cars who are piss-drunk, talking at the top of the lungs at 2 AM,  past windows that are close to the sidewalks. Not to mention the weird and very annoying habit of Sacramento girls talking fast in a very unflattering high-pitch voice and screaming "Woo Hoo!!!" all the time. What's up with that?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T23:08:10Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Plan to restrict Second Saturday street parking causes stir in Midtown "</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/68491/You_hit_on_the_solution_We_need_to_build_a_whole_lot_of_midtohigh_rise_residential_towers_ala_Vanco" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-68491</id>
    <updated>2012-05-25T21:32:44Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-25T21:32:44Z</published>
    <content type="text">You hit on the solution! We need to build a whole lot of mid-to-high rise residential towers- ala Vancouver (rated the city with the highest quality of life) downtown. That means halting new suburban housing development within the city limits and subsiding moderate income housing downtown. Great idea Curmuge. You are brilliant!</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T21:32:44Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Opinion: Parking Paranoia in Midtown Sacramento "</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/68489/By_charging_reidents_arent_you_penalizing_them_for_the_lack_of_parking_caused_by_people_who_not_vis" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-68489</id>
    <updated>2012-05-25T21:22:39Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-25T21:22:39Z</published>
    <content type="text">By charging reidents aren't you penalizing them for the lack of parking caused by people who not visiting said residents? Where would that money go and what would be the purpose of charging residents to have more than one visitor? Maybe to add insult to injury.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T21:22:39Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Downtown Sacramento Partnership keeps Sacramento moving forward"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/68488/You_sir_are_being_too_generous" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-68488</id>
    <updated>2012-05-25T21:08:59Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-25T21:08:59Z</published>
    <content type="text">You sir are being too generous.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T21:08:59Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "City Council candidates evaluated on friendliness to small business, food truck regulation"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/68152/As_far_as_my_district_goes_its_clear_that_Yee_and_Newton_are_status_quo_candidates_If_you_want_a_bo" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-68152</id>
    <updated>2012-05-22T06:35:33Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-22T06:35:33Z</published>
    <content type="text">As far as my district goes it's clear that Yee and Newton are status quo candidates. If you want a boring stagnant city vote for one them.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T06:35:33Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "POLL: Should Sacramento outsource city park maintenance?"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/68154/What_nonsense_it_is_to_say_if_its_on_NPR_it_must_be_false_And_its_sad_dont_you_think_when_one_canno" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-68154</id>
    <updated>2012-05-21T15:43:02Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-21T15:43:02Z</published>
    <content type="text">What nonsense it is to say if it's on NPR it must be false. And it's sad don't you think when one cannot tell when people are joking with them or pulling their leg- sort of speak? Bitterness and resentment is not very attractive. I would like to know what experience you actually have with these issues you seem to have an abundance of opinions on. 

Privatizing public services may or may not save the city money in the long run and it certainly does not guarantee that the quality of the service will be any better. My tolerance for the dogmatic and uncompromising ideologue has worn very thin.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T15:43:02Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Budget cuts whittle park maintenance to one-man crews"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67919/City_parks_belong_to_us_the_people_of_Sacramento_and_not_to_some_independent_and_impersonal_entity_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67919</id>
    <updated>2012-05-16T15:59:20Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-16T15:59:20Z</published>
    <content type="text">City parks belong to us, the people of Sacramento, and not to some independent and impersonal entity we call 'the city'. Therefore, we have a responsibility to take care of our parks. In the past we were financially able to hire enough people to do the work for us but times are tough so we are going to have start picking up the slack. This is nothing new. Even in wealthy cities like New York there was a time when park maintenance was so low that New Yorkers were forced to step up and step in to ensure that their great parks would survive into the future. Today we face comparably far fewer problems here in Sacramento. The question is are Sacramentans as good of citizens?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T15:59:20Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Mayor Kevin Johnson skips forum, candidates don’t mind"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67909/Is_it_just_me_or_are_other_people_also_embarrassed_by_the_field_of_candidates_for_the_mayors_office" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67909</id>
    <updated>2012-05-16T01:38:04Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-16T01:38:04Z</published>
    <content type="text">Is it just me or are other people also embarrassed by the field of candidates for the mayor's office?  I have nothing against Mr. Rewers and in fact voted for him (as much in protest of Mayor Johnson as anything else) but I don't believe he nor the current mayor have the qualities and experience that a city of our size needs.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T01:38:04Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Photos: A first look inside Firestone Public House"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67716/I_guess_its_better_than_a_defunct_tire_store" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67716</id>
    <updated>2012-05-11T16:36:01Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-11T16:36:01Z</published>
    <content type="text">I guess it's better than a defunct tire store.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-11T16:36:01Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Zocalo Comes to Sacramento"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67714/Churchill_also_said_Keep_England_White_is_a_good_slogan" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67714</id>
    <updated>2012-05-11T16:33:48Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-11T16:33:48Z</published>
    <content type="text">Churchill also said "Keep England White" is a good slogan.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-11T16:33:48Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Zocalo Comes to Sacramento"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67711/Discussing_democracy_is_always_welcomed_although_practicing_it_is_preferable_I_dont_get_the_name_Wh" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67711</id>
    <updated>2012-05-11T15:45:33Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-11T15:45:33Z</published>
    <content type="text">Discussing democracy is always welcomed, although practicing it is preferable. I don't get the name? Why is this called Zocalo- which is the name of the famous plaza in Mexico City.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-11T15:45:33Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "K Street's resurgence"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67698/Walked_by_on_this_block_at_around_300_this_afternoon_and_there_were_several_people_eating_at_both_C" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67698</id>
    <updated>2012-05-11T01:44:24Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-11T01:44:24Z</published>
    <content type="text">Walked by on this block at around 3:00 this afternoon and there were several people eating at both Cafe Bernardo and Pizza Rock. Haven't seen a post lunch, pre dinner crowd on K Street for a long time, if ever.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-11T01:44:24Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "K Street's resurgence"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67697/Gee_do_you_have_to_take_every_opportunity_to_take_a_dig_at_the_mayor_Enough_already_He_has_been_no_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67697</id>
    <updated>2012-05-11T01:34:45Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-11T01:34:45Z</published>
    <content type="text">Gee do you have to take every opportunity to take a dig at the mayor? Enough already. He has been no worse or better than any other mayor as far as I can tell.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-11T01:34:45Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Downtown bicycle lanes coming this summer"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67658/Please_clean_up_after_Fido_and_FiFi" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67658</id>
    <updated>2012-05-10T18:52:57Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-10T18:52:57Z</published>
    <content type="text">Please clean up after Fido and FiFi.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-10T18:52:57Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Downtown bicycle lanes coming this summer"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67654/You_are_confused_Rhys02_The_millions_of_taxpayer_dollars_are_going_towards_painting_stripes_on_the_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67654</id>
    <updated>2012-05-10T18:10:20Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-10T18:10:20Z</published>
    <content type="text">You are confused Rhys02. The millions of taxpayer dollars are going towards painting stripes on the freeways. Maybe the cub scouts should be out on I-80 this weekend?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-10T18:10:20Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "K Street's resurgence"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67650/Awesome_news_Thanks_Randy_for_having_faith_in_the_K_Street_comeback" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67650</id>
    <updated>2012-05-10T16:39:53Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-10T16:39:53Z</published>
    <content type="text">Awesome news. Thanks Randy for having faith in the K Street comeback!</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-10T16:39:53Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Mayor: Arena ‘plan B’ on hold until after city budget is resolved"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67608/Well_both_Portland_OR_and_Vancouver_BC_have_proved_that_you_dont_have_to_follow_that_model_to_becom" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67608</id>
    <updated>2012-05-09T17:12:44Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-09T17:12:44Z</published>
    <content type="text">Well both Portland, OR and Vancouver, BC have proved that you don't have to follow that model to become a successful and prosperous city. BTW San Jose was a thriving county hub long before it became the epitome of post-WWII California suburban sprawl so it was never going to be just another little California suburb. I don't know anyone who seriously looks to that town for guidance about how to create a great city. San Jose and many other cities are now trying to duplicate the success of cities like Vancouver. The funny thing is that Vancouver achieved it's success by doing the exact opposite of what you are proposing.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T17:12:44Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Mayor: Arena ‘plan B’ on hold until after city budget is resolved"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67605/Are_you_forgeting_that_Los_Angeles_County_has_or_at_least_used_to_have_a_lot_of_unincorpoated_urban" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67605</id>
    <updated>2012-05-09T16:21:48Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-09T16:21:48Z</published>
    <content type="text">Are you forgeting that Los Angeles County has or at least used to have a lot of unincorpoated urbanized areas? I don't know how unique we are in that regard but if your point is that greater population generally equates to greater political clout I agree. Still, I am pretty sure that most people today understand that the old-fashioned San Jose-Phoenix-Los Angeles model of growth by ever-increasing low-density suburbs has not produced better cities. We need to grow up not out.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T16:21:48Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Second Saturday: More than just an art walk, candidates say"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67602/I_had_heard_that_about_LA_too_but_that_was_not_my_experience_there_I_dont_know_if_things_have_chang" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67602</id>
    <updated>2012-05-09T15:44:25Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-09T15:44:25Z</published>
    <content type="text">I had heard that about LA too but that was not my experience there. I don't know if things have changed for the better or my visit was an aberration. 

"I'm not a big fan of the "special event" mentality in the first place. You shouldn't have to check a calendar to figure out whether something interesting is happening downtown." I understand what you are saying but we have a long way to go to produce the engery and foot traffic of Second Saturday every weekend. Obviously there's a lot of people here who want or maybe even need this sort of thing. That's why when I read that candidates who probably don't even participate in 2nd Saturdays talk about regulating an event that has already been regulated I cringe.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T15:44:25Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Mayor: Arena ‘plan B’ on hold until after city budget is resolved"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67599/Its_a_bit_off_topic_but_an_interesting_comment_Sacramento_is_indeed_a_fragmented_metropolis_with_a_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67599</id>
    <updated>2012-05-09T15:00:14Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-09T15:00:14Z</published>
    <content type="text">It's a bit off topic but an interesting comment. Sacramento is indeed a fragmented  metropolis with a split personally. Cities like Denver and Portland are their state's largest city so they draw in their state's best and brightest. The problem we have here is that San Francisco and the Bay Area have such an overwhelming gravitational force that it draws the creativity, talent and money away from Sacramento. And it's a process that's been going on since the Gold Rush days. 

But the biggest problem we have is a genuine resistance by many to accept the dichotomy that is Sacramento. Unlike cities like San Francisco, the majority of Sacramentans live in the suburbs. As such we have a more suburban 'culture'. Suburbanites here tend to dismiss the original city (it's all downtown to them) and many refuse to accept that Sacramento can be or should be a dynamic 'real city'. Or they just don't care. Why bother when they can just go to San Francisco for their weekend 'city fix'? Some of this is generational and many younger people would live 'downtown' if that were a viable option here as it is elsewhere.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T15:00:14Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Downtown bicycle lanes coming this summer"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67597/Great_news_And_a_long_overdue_improvement" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67597</id>
    <updated>2012-05-09T13:20:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-09T13:20:00Z</published>
    <content type="text">Great news! And a long overdue improvement.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T13:20:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Second Saturday: More than just an art walk, candidates say"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67587/Its_not_entirely_true_to_say_that_art_walks_in_other_cities_are_no_longer_about_the_art_I_was_in_LA" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67587</id>
    <updated>2012-05-09T04:49:13Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-09T04:49:13Z</published>
    <content type="text">It's not entirely true to say that art walks in other cities are no longer about the art. I was in LA for their 2nd Thursday Downtown Art Walk and was really impressed by the scope and variety of art mediums. At times I am impressed by the creative expression at our own Second Saturday. But I agree with Mark that it tends to be something done without the knowledge or encouragement of any local 'art officialdom'.  But Wlliam your critique of our lack of thoughtful and realistic planning is right on.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T04:49:13Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Second Saturday: More than just an art walk, candidates say"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67554/Well_said_Julie_Now_that_we_are_all_in_one_council_district_its_about_time_that_the_residents_of_th" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67554</id>
    <updated>2012-05-08T16:34:47Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-08T16:34:47Z</published>
    <content type="text">Well said Julie. Now that we are all in one council district it's about time that the residents of the central city neighborhoods: Midtown, Downtown, Southside Park, and Alkali Flats-North End came together to elect someone who will represent our interests for a change and move this city forward. From what I've seen and heard so far Phyllis Newton is not the person to do that.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-08T16:34:47Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Second Saturday: More than just an art walk, candidates say"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67541/Whats_clear_in_this_article_is_that_Newton_doesnt_know_what_she_is_talking_about_and_that_she_will_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67541</id>
    <updated>2012-05-08T05:28:49Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-08T05:28:49Z</published>
    <content type="text">What's clear in this article is that Newton doesn't know what she is talking about and that she will follow the typical pattern of reactionary local politicians catering to small but vocal not-very-special interests.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-08T05:28:49Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Use arena money to bolster school funding"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67103/Oh_brother_Whenever_theres_public_money_and_often_when_private_money_for_civic_purposes_involved_th" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67103</id>
    <updated>2012-04-28T03:48:48Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-28T03:48:48Z</published>
    <content type="text">Oh brother. Whenever there's public money (and often when private money for civic purposes) involved there's always a segment of the population that screams bloody murder -that the money could be spent on schools first and foremost. While I totally understand that a well-educated population is vital to the future of entire community I don't think we all share equal responsibility to fund schools. And there are plenty of people who prefer public money going for things open to all residents and for the benefit of all -not just kids and their parents.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-28T03:48:48Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Mayor, Maloofs call it quits on arena talks"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67102/At_this_point_I_think_all_the_most_die_hard_fans_dont_care_about_the_Kings" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67102</id>
    <updated>2012-04-28T03:36:09Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-28T03:36:09Z</published>
    <content type="text">At this point, I think all the most die hard fans don't care about the Kings.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-28T03:36:09Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Photos: Plaza Café Lounge now open"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/67101/Great_group_of_young_entrepreneurs_Good_coffee_and_paninis_Go_and_support_them" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-67101</id>
    <updated>2012-04-28T03:31:04Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-28T03:31:04Z</published>
    <content type="text">Great group of young entrepreneurs. Good coffee and paninis. Go and support them!</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-28T03:31:04Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Wells Fargo Center 20th Anniversary "</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66903/Thanks_for_the_info_and_pics_Michael_I_enjoy_your_blog_As_for_the_WFC_it_always_looked_like_a_giant" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66903</id>
    <updated>2012-04-23T22:26:59Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-23T22:26:59Z</published>
    <content type="text">Thanks for the info and pics Michael. I enjoy your blog. As for the WFC - it always looked like a giant tombstone to me. Was this some kind of joke or a commentary on our downtown? After HOK's newest- the  US Bank building down the street -with it's huge gawky billboard fixed atop a mediocre tower with glass that reflects down on the pedestrians like ants under a magnifying glass, i think we can safely say that these architects aren't the best for Sacramento.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-23T22:26:59Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Sactomofo: Sacramento Mobile Food"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66851/The_hearings_about_the_mobile_food_ordinance_before_the_Sacramento_City_Councils_Law_and_Legislatio" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66851</id>
    <updated>2012-04-23T17:15:25Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-23T17:15:25Z</published>
    <content type="text">The hearings about the mobile food ordinance before the Sacramento City Council's Law and Legislation committee has been repeatly cancelled. Why? Excuses aside we all know it's to stop the ordinance from being removed or modified. 

The reasons against the food trucks are petty. A handful of people with a not so-hidden agenda are trying to find problems where none exists. Amazingly it's not the small restauranteurs that have been the most vocal in their opposition to the food trucks. Rather it's been the larger, well-established and well-connected restauranteurs like Randy Paragary and Mason Wong who have used their influence to keep in place an ordinance that very few people here want. It's time for a change. Once again a handful of little 'big fish' are keeping Sacramento behind the times. Too bad for them, the pond is growing.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-23T17:15:25Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Sactomofo"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66847/Overall_I_applaud_the_owners_of_these_food_trucks_trying_to_gain_local_support_for_what_they_think_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66847</id>
    <updated>2012-04-23T16:17:58Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-23T16:17:58Z</published>
    <content type="text">"Overall, I applaud the owners of these food trucks trying to gain local support for what they think is an unfair and troubling law. The public should always be given the choice in what happens in smaller, local rules like this because that is the people who are affected by those rules; locals. Some times when regulations are made, problems arise from them. I'm sure the people who wanted to ban these food trucks had good intentions, but the road to hell is paved with good intentions. I would fully recommend people supporting these food trucks" 

Well said. The only thing I would differ with is assuming that the people who wanted ban food trucks had good intentions. They did not.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-23T16:17:58Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Très Chic Boutique to bid adieu"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66788/Maybe_if_they_had_more_daytime_customers_they_could_afford_to_stay_open_later_for_you_Its_amazing_h" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66788</id>
    <updated>2012-04-20T18:28:55Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-20T18:28:55Z</published>
    <content type="text">Maybe if they had more daytime customers they could afford to stay open later for you. It's amazing how many of you are completely clueless to the reality of the local retail market.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-20T18:28:55Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Très Chic Boutique to bid adieu"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66726/I_bet_most_of_the_customers_to_Tres_Chic_shopped_during_the_day_or_on_Saturdays_Most_people_have_th" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66726</id>
    <updated>2012-04-18T21:24:07Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-18T21:24:07Z</published>
    <content type="text">I bet most of the customers to Tres Chic shopped during the day or on Saturdays. Most people have things to do after work -like cook dinner or they just want to get home and relax - not shop. Besides keeping a shop open late usually isnt that profitable. Most people don't shop for clothes on the weeknights and you would have to pay for more employees. See William your simplistic solution is not a solution at all. Why not just get rid of the parking meters altogether? Or at least make parking free on Saturdays.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T21:24:07Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Très Chic Boutique to bid adieu"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66712/Thanks_for_clarifying_that_Brandon_As_someone_who_has_had_experience_with_this_problem_I_can_tell_y" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66712</id>
    <updated>2012-04-18T18:05:19Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-18T18:05:19Z</published>
    <content type="text">Thanks for clarifying that Brandon. As someone who has had experience with this problem I can tell you that many customers find new meters confusing and are a deterrent to business. However, when we had the old meters it's was still a problem- it was just not as bad. I think we all generally accept an idea or practice until enough people realize the fallacy of the argument or 'logic' behind it. 

The arguement for metered spaces on designated city streets is that it  encourages turnover, allowing more people access to high-demand parking spaces. But turnover can be achieved by having time limits. And if those parking meters are driving away customers and decreasing the demand then what's need for them- other than to collect revenue?

Some cities  have realized that a retail district can benefit without the use of on-street parking meters, that there's a direct positive correlation when potential customers aren't charged to visit a certain section of town. And many thriving cities around the world never had them to begin with. Of course, some dubious businesses like pay-parking lot operators would scream. But there is nothing in the constitution stating that every city must have metered parking. This may be a good time to consider the elimination of parking meters on certain streets as an incentive to stimulate retail growth during an economic recession.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T18:05:19Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Très Chic Boutique to bid adieu"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66707/Who_said_anything_about_removing_parking_from_the_core_Didnt_you_read_the_above_article_which_clear" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66707</id>
    <updated>2012-04-18T16:31:46Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-18T16:31:46Z</published>
    <content type="text">Who said anything about removing parking from the core? Didn't you read the above article which clearly states that many Midtown business believe that the new parking meters are driving away customers right now? Besides you could still impose time limits and ticket drivers. BTW i am a resident and have a small business in Midtown so I know what's going. If you remove parking meters everywhere how is that going to remove parking?  Right now downtown office workers take advantage of unmetered parking spaces in the neighborhoods. I don't see how removing parking meters will make that any worst. In fact, it might improve the situation. I guess in an effort to keep the state jobs concentrated downtown the state was not required to provide adequate parking for it's employees. Maybe that's something that needs to be addressed but that's another topic.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T16:31:46Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Kombucha bar eyes Hina's Tea space"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66703/I_agree_about_widening_the_appeal_to_more_customers_Why_not_add_a_fresh_fruit_veggie_juice_bar_Mayb" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66703</id>
    <updated>2012-04-18T15:51:47Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-18T15:51:47Z</published>
    <content type="text">I agree about widening the appeal to more customers. Why not add a fresh fruit &amp; veggie juice bar? Maybe they should start out as a business within a business first. Like partner with Sugar Plum or the Vegan shop. 

As for the landlord's supposed risk - I don't see how the landord is taking on much of a risk by collecting money every month for a space that has sat empty not generating any income for awhile. Any landlord assumes a certain amount of risk and responsibility in exchange for that rent. Unless the landlord agrees to pay for certain specific leasehold improvements and thinks they won't recover those cost because the tenant won't be around long enough. But that's what contracts are for.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T15:51:47Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Think Big ponders next move"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66700/MyQuest_why_dont_you_enlighten_me_with_your_incontrovertible_evidence_of_the_DSPs_remarkable_achiev" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66700</id>
    <updated>2012-04-18T13:58:39Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-18T13:58:39Z</published>
    <content type="text">MyQuest why don't you enlighten me with your incontrovertible evidence of the DSP's remarkable achievements? Given the fact that most downtowns across the country have experienced something of a renaissance in the last couple of decades IMO they could not had done a worst job if they just sat around twiddling their thumbs all these years. Come on. Who in their right mind would think they've done a 'remarkable job'? Either you work for the DSP or are associated with them in some way OR you just have no clue what a quality downtown actually is... which I doubt. Even if the Micheal Ault is a good guy and has a better grasp on the situation than anyone at city hall the DSP still has been awfully ineffective in turning downtown around.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T13:58:39Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Mayor wants to move on arena – with or without Kings"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66697/Without_a_guaranteed_NBA_or_NHL_team_there_will_be_no_new_arena_period_end_of_discussion_Not_that_a" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66697</id>
    <updated>2012-04-18T07:23:46Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-18T07:23:46Z</published>
    <content type="text">Without a guaranteed NBA or NHL team there will be no new arena, period, end of discussion. Not that an new civic arena wouldn't be nice but there's just no credible way to finance it here without a  team.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T07:23:46Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Très Chic Boutique to bid adieu"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66695/It_is_fundamentally_unfair_to_charge_people_to_park_on_the_streets_in_some_areas_of_the_city_and_no" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66695</id>
    <updated>2012-04-18T07:13:59Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-18T07:13:59Z</published>
    <content type="text">It is fundamentally unfair to charge people to park on the streets in some areas of the city and not in others. According to Wikipedia parking meters have been challenged in court many times for many many years, but are considered legal if the parking meters are used for purposes of parking regulation and not for revenue purposes. Does anyone believe that the city is NOT using the parking meters primarily for revenue purposes? I think the Midtown/Downtown businesses should sue the city for loss of revenue and for the removal of the parking meters altogether. Why not start the parking meter revolt here in Sacramento? If the city is worried about losing revenue then let them find other ways to make up the loss rather than continue to impose a burdensome tax on only some of it's residents.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T07:13:59Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Group gathering signatures for vote on arena issue"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66589/I_agree" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66589</id>
    <updated>2012-04-17T01:23:54Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-17T01:23:54Z</published>
    <content type="text">I agree!</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-17T01:23:54Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Think Big ponders next move"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66588/Michael_Ault_said_From_day_one_this_has_not_been_about_the_Kings_or_the_Maloofs_Really_Thats_a_lie_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66588</id>
    <updated>2012-04-17T01:22:12Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-17T01:22:12Z</published>
    <content type="text">Michael Ault said -“From day one this has not been about the Kings or the Maloofs” Really? That's a lie. We wouldn't be talking about a downtown arena if it were not for the Kings. Why would anyone take this guy serious? Michael Ault has failed at his job- which he has had for far too long. And the Downtown Sacramento Partnership is a failed organization. It's time to pink-slip Mr. Ault and/or reorganize the DSP. For the life of me I don't know why he still has that job. Maybe it's because he's tall?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-17T01:22:12Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Officials disappointed, but moving forward with intermodal facility"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66523/Another_person_who_has_no_clue_about_whats_going_at_the_Railyards_and_thinks_it_all_started_with_th" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66523</id>
    <updated>2012-04-14T16:53:13Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-14T16:53:13Z</published>
    <content type="text">Another person who has no clue about what's going at the Railyards and thinks it all started with the arena. Jeezh.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-14T16:53:13Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Johnson: Arena deal with Maloofs is 'absolutely' dead"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66522/No_its_not_the_best_news_for_Sacramento_But_maybe_you_are_one_of_the_many_who_are_more_worried_abou" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66522</id>
    <updated>2012-04-14T16:50:04Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-14T16:50:04Z</published>
    <content type="text">No it's not the best news for Sacramento. But maybe you are one of the many who are  more worried about downtown traffic and finding a parking space than people losing their jobs/income?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-14T16:50:04Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "STOP ponders next move in wake of dead arena deal"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66516/Do_you_remember_my_words_a_few_weeks_ago_I_am_suspicious_of_STOP_Not_because_i_support_the_arena_de" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66516</id>
    <updated>2012-04-14T16:40:18Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-14T16:40:18Z</published>
    <content type="text">Do you remember my words a few weeks ago -   " I am suspicious of STOP. Not because i support the arena deal but because these people will then take their database and use it to stop any and all future development/government expenditure that Julian Camacho and his friends deem unworthy. We need to be diligent in regards to public expenditures. The Sacramento city council and the mayor cannot be completely trusted to do the right thing. We must oppose a bad deal. But we should be careful not to create another problem (monster) in the process." 

Sacramento is full of bottom-feeders. Of course the Maloofs are parasites.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-14T16:40:18Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Bounty hunter Padilla runs for mayor for a fifth time"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66520/Oh_are_you_trying_to_say_something_relevant_to_the_arena_and_use_of_public_money_and_using_a_story_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66520</id>
    <updated>2012-04-14T15:20:42Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-14T15:20:42Z</published>
    <content type="text">Oh are you trying to say something relevant to the arena and use of public money and using a story about bounty hunter for mayor to do so? C'mon...really?!</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-14T15:20:42Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "STOP ponders next move in wake of dead arena deal"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66517/Huh_Who_could_have_seen_this_coming_Oh_yeah_me" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66517</id>
    <updated>2012-04-14T15:11:20Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-14T15:11:20Z</published>
    <content type="text">Huh. Who could have seen this coming? Oh yeah me.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-14T15:11:20Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Officials disappointed, but moving forward with intermodal facility"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66514/It_was_telling_that_the_original_owner_and_developers_of_the_Railyards_Plan_was_never_keen_on_the_i" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66514</id>
    <updated>2012-04-14T14:59:47Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-14T14:59:47Z</published>
    <content type="text">It was telling that the original owner and developers of the Railyards Plan was never keen on the idea of an arena at the Railyards. BTW a new intermodal transit center was part of the Railyards plan from the very beginning. The arena was very much an afterthought. And anyone who comes long and suggests that we should adopt ULI recommendations for a transit village obviously hasn't a clue about Railyards Project.   

Let us now 'think big' -- what else could go on this city owned land? Perhaps a downtown branch of UC Davis -ala UCSF Mission Bay in San Francisco OR  some other educational facility such as a school of art and design?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-14T14:59:47Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "NBA Commissioner: 'Nothing more to be done' to save arena deal"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66512/It_is_strange_how_you_end_up_defending_the_Maloofs_just_because_their_position_supports_your_opposi" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66512</id>
    <updated>2012-04-14T14:31:25Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-14T14:31:25Z</published>
    <content type="text">It is strange how you end up defending the Maloofs just because their position supports your opposition to the arena deal. It's possible that the deal was simultaneously a good deal for the Maloofs and the city -but that the Maloofs never wanted a deal in the first place. I think the other losers in this deal are those locals who for political expediency supported the Maloofs in this whole fiasco.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-14T14:31:25Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "NBA Commissioner: 'Nothing more to be done' to save arena deal"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66511/From_your_and_Williams_comments_you_both_appear_to_be_saying_that_the_Maloofs_had_legitimate_cause_" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66511</id>
    <updated>2012-04-14T14:18:21Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-14T14:18:21Z</published>
    <content type="text">From your and William's comments you both appear to be saying that the Maloofs had legitimate cause to back out of the deal because the city was not honest. Of course, we all should note that both of you were against the arena deal even before the details of the deal were disclosed. So we must take that into consideration. Are you so blinded by your outrage at the Mayor and council for voting for this deal that you don't see or want to admit that it was and always has been the Maloofs' intention to move the team and they were the ones who were foremost, dishonest?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-14T14:18:21Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "STOP ponders next move in wake of dead arena deal"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66493/Well_what_a_surprise_The_bottomfeeders_over_at_STOP_will_continue_with_their_work_Maybe_we_will_end" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66493</id>
    <updated>2012-04-14T05:29:28Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-14T05:29:28Z</published>
    <content type="text">Well what a surprise! The bottom-feeders over at STOP will continue with their 'work'. Maybe we will end up hating them as much as we do the Maloofs.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-14T05:29:28Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Maloofs: 'No arena deal if mayor won't negotiate'"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66464/Either_that_or_he_is_a_good_actor_Maybe_Stern_and_the_Maloofs_are_both_playing_us_So_sorry_Sacramen" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66464</id>
    <updated>2012-04-13T22:04:45Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-13T22:04:45Z</published>
    <content type="text">Either that or he is a good actor. Maybe Stern and the Maloofs are both playing us. So sorry Sacramento that the Maloofs won't play nice but what can we do about it? I suspect that Mike M might be right and this was all a play.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-13T22:04:45Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Bounty hunter Padilla runs for mayor for a fifth time"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66432/Oh_please_it_was_not_very_hateful_only_mildly_so_Lets_not_be_melodramatic_I_would_agree_that_if_the" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66432</id>
    <updated>2012-04-13T21:23:48Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-13T21:23:48Z</published>
    <content type="text">Oh please it was not very hateful- only mildly so. Let's not be melodramatic. I would agree that if they were directed at anyone else they would be shallow and sexist comments but we are talking about the wife of Leonard "media whore" Padilla here. And of course, let's not forget that Tom is expected to say inappropriate things as it's part of his condition. Come on Sacramentans pull the stick out and have some fun.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-13T21:23:48Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "NBA Commissioner: 'Nothing more to be done' to save arena deal"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66439/So_do_they_stay_or_go" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66439</id>
    <updated>2012-04-13T21:18:18Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-13T21:18:18Z</published>
    <content type="text">So do they stay or go?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-13T21:18:18Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "Maloofs: 'No arena deal if mayor won't negotiate'"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66433/Come_on_I_am_not_a_big_fan_of_KJ_but_I_wont_use_every_opportunity_to_bash_the_man_Your_bias_is_show" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66433</id>
    <updated>2012-04-13T20:59:39Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-13T20:59:39Z</published>
    <content type="text">Come on. I am not a big fan of KJ but I won't use every opportunity to bash the man. Your bias is showing a bit too much.  The mayor isn't the one with egg on his face this time- sorry to disappoint you.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-13T20:59:39Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "The Arena, Downtown &amp; the Parkway"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66237/Old_Sacramento_is_fine_lovely_really_I_guess_if_youve_never_been_anywhere_else_it_is_If_you_are_eas" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66237</id>
    <updated>2012-04-09T20:46:27Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-09T20:46:27Z</published>
    <content type="text">Old Sacramento is fine... lovely ...really? I guess if you've never been anywhere else it is. If you are easily amused or have little or no taste buds. If you  like crowed, dusty, dirty, broken-down, traffic-clogged places full of sloppily dressed overweight people. If you are thrilled by candy stores and over-the-hill bikers. If you prefer the sights and sounds of freeways and cars to just about anything -including human conversation. Then yeah, Old Sacramento is lovely. I know a lot of city  residents who would disagree with you.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-09T20:46:27Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "The Arena, Downtown &amp; the Parkway"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66235/Hey_thats_been_the_idea_Ive_been_pushing_on_my_blog_and_other_forums_for_years_And_its_a_good_one_i" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66235</id>
    <updated>2012-04-09T20:33:30Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-09T20:33:30Z</published>
    <content type="text">Hey that's been the idea I've been pushing on my blog and other forums for years. And it's a good one if I don't say so myself.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-09T20:33:30Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "State Capitol Museum Presents "Governor's Day" Living History Event - 4/22 "</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66234/For_some_reason_I_cringe_at_the_sight_of_sixty_year_olds_dressing_up_in_Edwardian_garb_and_pretendi" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66234</id>
    <updated>2012-04-09T20:27:55Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-09T20:27:55Z</published>
    <content type="text">For some reason I cringe at the sight of sixty year olds dressing up in Edwardian garb and pretending.  I feel like am at Stockton's Ye Olde Hoosier Inn. I'll have the roastbeef with a baked potata please.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-09T20:27:55Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "New restaurant serves families in Old Sacramento"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66233/If_Old_Sacramento_is_such_a_horrible_place_to_take_kids_why_are_there_so_many_of_them" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66233</id>
    <updated>2012-04-09T20:20:24Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-09T20:20:24Z</published>
    <content type="text">If Old Sacramento  is such a horrible place to take kids why are there so many of them?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-09T20:20:24Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "City to meet with mobile food vendors to discuss ordinance"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66169/I_hope_the_city_officials_come_to_their_senses" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66169</id>
    <updated>2012-04-07T15:27:12Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-07T15:27:12Z</published>
    <content type="text">I hope the city officials come to their senses.</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-07T15:27:12Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">JWS on "New restaurant serves families in Old Sacramento"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/66141/So_its_a_chain_restaurant" />
    <author>
      <name>JWS</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-66141</id>
    <updated>2012-04-06T05:31:38Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-06T05:31:38Z</published>
    <content type="text">So it's a chain restaurant?</content>
    <dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-06T05:31:38Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

