STORYLINE Breaking and Action News Stories

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Firefighters rescue injured transient from water channel

by Ed Fogle, published on June 29, 2009 at 7:52 PM

1 of 6
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 6
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

Sacramento, CA- Firefighters called to rescue an injured transient on the steep slope of a water channel

William Lockwood and his girlfriend, Angel Love have been residing under the overpass, that spans the water channel, on 88th Street off of Fruitridge Blvd. Monday morning Lockwood lost his footing at the top of the channel and tumbled down the steep cement side coming to a stop just before the water. Injured and unable to climb back up the steep cement slope, Angel summoned for help.

Sacramento Fire Truck 10 and Paramedics received the call near 11:30 a.m. The truck crew had to commence a rope rescue with the stokes litter to safely bring Lockwood to the top.

Lockwood was transported to the hospital by paramedics with minor injuries.
 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

June 30, 2009 | 3:09 AM
I'm glad our tax payers monies went to the saving of "Angel Love's" bf.
1 0
REPLY
edited on  June 30, 2009 | 8:07 AM
You were reading my mind. As I'm following breaking news on a daily basis now, it is amazing to visually see how much of our EMS, Fire and Police resources are used by this demographic. You will probably start seeing more of these type of stories coming from my direction, so that the readers can at least see the ones that I can keep up with and be informed.
2 0
REPLY
June 30, 2009 | 1:15 PM
Wow, it's almost as though it would be cheaper to provide housing to the homeless than the costs incured to emergency services for incidents like this.
1 1
REPLY
June 30, 2009 | 2:26 PM
You got a good point there William. It would be interesting to see the numbers on costs for fire/paramedic services, police, damage from fires, etc.
0 1
REPLY
June 30, 2009 | 2:24 PM
Almost.
1 1
REPLY
June 30, 2009 | 4:09 PM
A safe place to camp would be a really great start! Come to the "Safe Ground" rally and march tomorrow starting at 10am @ Loaves & Fishes to support a safe and legal place for homeless people to camp. For more information visit: http://safegroundsac.org/
0 2
REPLY
June 30, 2009 | 7:32 PM
Forcing the homeless to live in campgrounds is inhumane and only perpetuates the homeless problem You should be ashamed of yourself for proposing such a solution. William Burg is correct...it is cheaper to house the homeless with on-site supportive services than to it is to rely on Emergency personnel to act as a band-aid.
1 1
REPLY
edited on  June 30, 2009 | 8:55 PM
So true Tom.... I like your point. I've done some limited work with the homeless here and it's a deeper issue than what most think. Some of these folks are actually pretty sharp, but there's a spiritual/emotional disconnect if you will. They've lost the hope and drive to succeed and until they reach a spot that they are tired of living the life they now live, they won't reconnect and become a viable part of society. I've talked with "Batman & Robin" Officers Mike and Mike, that work with the area homeless. They're challenge is that this situation for folks is not temporary while they get back on their feet; these tenured officers are seeing the same people 10 years later. Organizations like Victory Outreach have an effective and strategic program to help those who are ready and willing, to get back on track. It's a hard one to call because you can't make someone emotionally/spiritually reconnect. So yeah Tom, in my very unprofessional, untrained opinion, I think you are right on.
0 0
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 12:07 AM
Ed, Do you feel better about yourself after you post? Have you let everyone know how empathetic you are about the homeless? Great. Now if you really want to do something to solve the problem start demanding that our city and county fund simple, affordable housing units and staff them with on site support. That is the only way we will stop forcing people to live on the street. Everything else is nonsense.
1 1
REPLY
edited on  July 1, 2009 | 12:37 AM
Hmmmm.....some reason you had to go personal atack mode there Tom? Feel free to contact me diirectly any time. My email address is ed@maverickphotography.us
0 0
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 6:39 PM
This is not a personal attack. I'm just tired of homeless advocates using navel gazing disguised as public policy. You feel sorry for the homeless? Whoopee! There's a crowd of folks on Bercut Drive right now who claim the same thing. What will the homeless get out of it? Tents and a place to shit in a bucket. That does nothing to solve the problem. If the folks protesting on Bercut right now wanted to affect any meaningful change the would be demanding that our city and county government fully fund supportive housing and insist that all developers pay a 15-18% affordable housing fee to build supportive units to meet the demand for new units.
1 1
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 8:39 PM
Just thinking outside of the box here....perhaps they could get up in the morning and go to work, and pay for some housing?

1 1
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 10:33 PM
Do you know anyone who is hiring folks with mental health and/or substance abuse problems? I'm gonna guess there's not a lot of employees clamoring for that kind of workforce.

We need housing with on-site support. Those that can be introduced or reintroduced into the workforce can start to lead productive lives and move on to better living situation. Those that are unable to lead productive lives will be looked after in a humane manner but will be less of a burden on government resources than if they were left to streets.

If people believe that folks can even attempt to transition to becoming productive members of society while living in a tent on a lot, they are delusional.


0 0
REPLY
edited on  July 2, 2009 | 10:24 AM
Hmmm. So no consequences for bad decision making, just a cradle to grave support system? Sign me up!
I assure you that folks with drinking and drug problems populate the working and bill paying society of the world. And there are mental health probelms to some degree everywhere you look.
The big difference is most people understand shame, responseability and dignity, and eventually work through it.
As for the professional bums, I just cringe at the though of a reward systyem at my personal cost to provide for those who refuse to help themselvs. They need to held accountable for their decisions, and not sheltered from the cosequences.
If they are truely incable of navigatng through life at some level of accptable behavior they should seek help from friends, family and church. They do not need a tent, they need their personal support system to manage them through the transition. But iff they decide to be a parasite, they should be treated as such.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background