STORYLINE city politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Land Park group recommends changes to Freeport Blvd Bike Lane Project

by Paayal Zaveri, published on October 15, 2012 at 7:24 AM

Storyline: city politics RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

A neighborhood association in Land Park said it will support a plan to install bicycle lanes on Freeport Boulevard, as long as the city takes steps to mitigate increased traffic, make up for lost business parking and monitor the project’s long-term impact.

“It is impossible to predict exactly what will happen when bike lanes are introduced and vehicle lanes reduced,” Land Park Community Association President Mark Abrahams said in an email. “In short, we recognize that the changes proposed in the Freeport Boulevard Bike Lane Project have had a very desirable effect elsewhere in Sacramento and in many other cities, but that changing the layout of the street is really only half the project here. The effects must also be monitored and negative impacts corrected, or the project may well result in disaster, not success.”

The LPCA released a statement on Oct. 2 in support of the the Freeport Boulevard Bike Lane Project, which aims to add bike lanes to the segment of Freeport Boulevard between Sutterville Road and 21st Street during the scheduled resurfacing next summer.

Image by: City of Sacramento

The statement includes a list of changes that the organization says must occur for the project to succeed.

  • City staff must still find ways to accommodate business parking on Freeport Boulevard to make up for lost parking spaces.
  • Mitigation measures must be implemented to alleviate the “cut-through” commuter traffic on the east/west residential streets along Freeport Boulevard.
  • The city should conduct a bicycle usage study to determine if bike-friendly policies are doing what they are meant to and increasing bike usage and safety. 
  • The city should review the project next summer to determine the consequences of the project.
  • The city should keep itself updated on the adverse impacts of the project and work to lessen them in a timely manner. 

Freeport Boulevard is home to a number of locally owned businesses, a high school, a community college, a senior living community, a park and many residences – all factors that had to be taken into consideration when planning the project.

Project Manager David Edrosolan said the city is still working out the details of the project, but hopes to have it ready to present to City Council on Nov. 8. 

“There are two roadway segment options and four intersection options,” Edrosolan said. “At this time, we don’t know which one will be implemented.”

The LPCA said it conducted a survey that indicated the majority of Land Park residents  support the option that would change Freeport Boulevard from two lanes in each direction with on-street parking, to one lane in each direction, with a center turn lane, bike lanes, and no on-street parking.

The LPCA is not the only group that supports the project. Freeport Boulevard attracts many bikers due to the proximity of McClatchy High School and Sacramento City College. The addition of bike lanes was proposed by students, faculty and parents at McClatchy High School in order to improve bike safety for students going to school, according to an article published in January in The Sacramento Press

Edrosolan said that the community and bikers have been requesting a bike lane between Sutterville Road and 21st Street that also provides connectivity between north and south. 

“We appreciate the input and opinions of all the neighbors and residents and businesses that are along the project route,” said Linda Tucker, Department of Transportation spokeswoman. “We take that into consideration also and choose a preferred alternative.”

The city’s transportation staff is holding a community meeting on Thursday, Oct. 25, with a short presentation about the Freeport Boulevard project and a chance for community members to ask questions. It will be held in the McClatchy High School cafeteria. 

What do you think about the Freeport Boulevard Bike Lane Project? Does the LPCA have the right approach to it? And what do you think about the city’s efforts to be more bike-friendly?

The full statment from the LPCA:

Land Park Community Association statement on the Freeeport Blvd. Bike Lane Project

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

October 15, 2012 | 8:04 AM
long long over due! From a business point of view slowing traffic and making room for bicycles will only increase eyes on storefronts. But the real win will be the peace of mind for all the students biking to class.
Super antiquated set up as it stands. Landpark and its students deserve much, much better.
6 0
REPLY
October 15, 2012 | 8:29 AM
Agree with John. In addition to making it safer for McClatchy and SCC students, Freeport + 19th/21st will provide a continuous bike route from north of downtown to South Sac, something that Sacramento is sorely lacking.
5 0
REPLY
October 15, 2012 | 9:39 AM
The alternative I support basically calls for retention of parking at the expense of turn lanes. This would be better for business. Slowed traffic combined with retained parking holds a promise of a quieter, more walkable and bikeable commercial district. I believe this section of Freeport has great potential as a commercial district if we do this right.
3 0
REPLY
October 15, 2012 | 11:05 AM
I agree that parking will be tight, but no center turn lane seems like a non-starter to me. Every time someone turns left, traffic would, by necessity, completely stop behind them. The project is already slated to decrease speeds (a good thing, many would argue), push a small amount of traffic on to parallel streets, and increase cut-through traffic, so I imagine that taking a step that would make traffic worse would probably not fly.
2 0
REPLY
October 15, 2012 | 1:13 PM
I guess it depends on what the city's traffic analysis says. Perhaps a compromise would be a few turn lanes rather than turn lanes through the entire stretch. However, residents on streets with those turn lanes would probably object, citing increased traffic on their streets. There never is a perfect solution, but concerns from residents about traffic for comparable projects anywhere I've ever lived have often turned out to be overblown.
1 0
REPLY
October 17, 2012 | 9:36 AM
I am disappointed that the city has not mentioned the stretch of Freeport between Sutterville Road south (near the old Blockbuster) and Sutterville Road north (near City College). In this stretch, with the new striping, we are condensing 3 lanes (one coming from Sutterville alongside City College) into one lane. I simply can't imagine morning traffic going north being anything but a huge bottleneck that will even back up traffic on the stretch of Sutterville south.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background