STORYLINE City Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Gone to pot: Report recommends changes to city ordinance on medical marijuana

by Jared Goyette, published on October 5, 2012 at 7:57 AM

Storyline: City Politics RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

Sacramento might become a less pot-friendly city Tuesday if the City Council follows through on city staff recommendations to further restrict where marijuana can be grown or purchased.

The staff report makes the following recommendations for the council: 1) Prohibit the outdoor cultivation of medical marijuana in residential areas, and 2) expand the distance dispensaries can be from parks and schools, from 600 to 1,000 feet.

The agenda packet includes a letter from Dennis A. Hunter, a retired resident of South Natomas who calls for the city to enact the ban on growing pot in residential areas.

It’s not typical of the kind of writing one normally finds in council agendas.

Hunter, in an impassioned and at times dramatic style, writes that when his neighbor began growing marijuana, the odor drifted over onto his property.

"The first major problem is the stench of the marijuana plants. It is overbearing. It migrates onto our property and surrounds our house. It seem as if a scunk has constantly been spraying."

He says that he is not opposed to medical marijuana on principle.

"Let me say that my wife and I have nothing against any individual who chooses this form of treatment for illness. However, we are keenly aware of how easy it is to obtain a medical marijuana card. I shutter to think what the quality of lives would be like if our other neighbors obtained medical marijuana cards and began growing their own marijuana outdoors."

Sacramento regulates marijuana dispensaries under a city ordinance passed last year, a fact that the staff report brings up in its "Policy considerations" section, which adds some useful context:

“The Sacramento City Council found in adopting the location criteria in November 2010 that it was appropriate for a medical marijuana dispensary to be located a minimum distance from sensitive uses. These distance requirements were developed after substantial staff research and public input. Nothing in the operation of the dispensaries has changed to indicate that a dispensary proposing to relocate to a different site should be permitted to locate closer to one of the sensitive uses listed in the ordinance. The only change has been the level of federal enforcement on marijuana dispensaries, causing owners of existing dispensaries to look for new locations.

“Currently, the Sacramento City Code does not address the topic of indoor or outdoor cultivation. If an ordinance restricting the outdoor cultivation of medical marijuana in residential areas was adopted, patients or their caregivers would still be permitted to grow medical marijuana inside a structure in residential areas, but the ordinance would also ensure that the growing of the plants would not become an attractive nuisance (anything on a premises that might attract children or entice visitors or trespassers into danger or harm).”

The proposed changes are likely to draw supporters and detractors to City Hall on Tuesday. Check back Wednesday morning for video highlights of the discussion on SacramentoPress.com.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

October 5, 2012 | 12:38 PM
American taxpayers are being forced to pay $40 Billion a year for a prohibition that causes 10,000 brutal murders & 800,000 needless arrests each year, but which doesn't even stop CHILDREN getting marijuana.

After seventy-five years of prohibition, it's obvious that the federal marijuana prohibition causes FAR more harm than good and must END! Drug Dealers Don't Card, Supermarkets Do.
6 2
REPLY
October 5, 2012 | 4:39 PM
There is an adult products store on Broadway, that in 30 years has had fewer police calls than the McDonald's down the street has in a single year. These distance rules from schools and parks is just so much sophomoric pablum, that really just meant as a way to harass a business out of existence. We now have sex offenders and ex-cons homeless and living in the American River Parkway because they cannot find housing that isn't within some ridiculous prohibited distance from schools and parks.
5 1
REPLY
October 5, 2012 | 9:15 PM
I hate the smell of gardenias. Can we ban them too?
2 2
REPLY
October 6, 2012 | 4:03 AM
By all means there should be some regulation but if odor is your biggest problem I don't have a lot of sympathy. I wish I had such a ridiculously weightless problem as the smell of Marijuana. In my neighborhood -socially retarded 20-something suburbanites are disturbing the peace, destroying property and threatening Midtown residents after their bender at one of the way-too-many dive bars.

Drinking causes a lot more social problems than does pot smoking. Cannabis has a number of health benefits when used sensibly and only minor problems when not. We can not say the same for alcohol. That is a fact. So what is our city council doing about the REAL PROBLEM of irresponsible drinking? Nada. Why? Because the bars pay the city a lot of money and because we have people raised up on the 'Just Say No' propaganda influencing our irrational policy rather than common sense, facts and compassion.

I'm in favor of closing the bars in residential areas down at midnight rather than 2 am. I think two hours less of public drinking would really help alleviate some the problems we have in Midtown.
1 2
REPLY
October 8, 2012 | 9:42 AM
We need a red light district just like Amsterdam where 24 hour partying is controlled and the rest of the city is at peace. Of all the cities I love, Amsterdamn is the one that comes to mind because of their policies based in reality. Mind numbing activity be it memory encysting weed smoking or reaction time crushing beer pounding can be contained and not become contagion to all our neighborhoods. I truly believe our only way out of our issues with drug/ alcohol "blunting" our cities survival potential is to create a zone for this. Problem is where.
0 1
REPLY
October 8, 2012 | 10:46 AM
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/10/07/4886157/is-the-midtown-party-out-of-controlresidents.html

I stopped visiting bars when I could visit medical cannabis dispensaries. I think bars are bigger problems.
0 1
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background