STORYLINE City Agenda's

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Open Letter to Sacramento City Council to think big

by Rhonda Erwin, published on August 26, 2012 at 10:31 PM

Storyline: City Agenda's RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

On Tuesday August 28, 2012 it is rumored Virginia Beach City Counsel will hear a presentation from Comcast-Spectacor to build a new Sports/ Entertainment arena in Virginia Beach.

It is also rumored the Maloofs are looking to move the Sacramento Kings to Virginia Beach if their city council approves the new arena deal.

According to a USA Today article, Eric W. Rose, the Maloofs’ spokesman, said: “It is becoming clearer that the foundation of Think Big is built on fabrication and deception. The name of the organization should be changed to Think Big Fraud,”

Wouldn’t the allegations of  "the foundation of Think Big is built on fabrication and deception" warrant our city council to show concern, raise questions and provide the residents of Sacramento the truth as to why the Maloofs backed out of the deal?

Does Sacramento want to keep or seek a sports team under any means necessary including behaving unethically?

Does our city counsel condone poor sportsmanship as long as it allows us to keep an NBA team?

Should our Mayor and Think Big share in the responsibility of the failed deal?

Should they represent our city in negotiating future deals when they appear to be thieves and attempted to steal and sell the Kings from underneath the Maloofs? (see below Sports Illustrated article)

On the February 12, 2012 letter Think Big sent to Chris Steve Hansen, it begins, “ On behalf of the 99% of us who make up the wonderful mosaic that is the great City of Sacramento, we have one message for the top 1/10th of the 1% who is engaged in actions detrimental to our community: KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF OUR KINGS."

Does Think Big represent 99% of us?

When Anaheim showed interest in the Sacramento Kings, it appears Sacramento attempted to strong arm the King owners and threaten Anaheim in efforts to keep the Kings in Sacramento.  

When Seattle showed interest in the Sacramento Kings, Think Big sent a wild-wild-west-meet-us-at-high-noon-for-battle-letter to Chris Hansen ironically accusing Seattle of engaging in “predatory behavior.”
http://www.thinkbigsacramento.com/assets/Public-Reports/Open-Letter-CH.pdf

Did we behaved ethically in trying to keep the team and reach a deal? Is Think Big giving us a one-sided description of what went wrong? Are they credible?

Should we look into the actions of Think Big before pressing forward in search of a Baseball team to ensure another deal will not go sour?

I appreciate and respect a mayor strong enough to fight for our city. But shouldn’t we fight ethically and with integrity?

It is written in a Think Big press release “Central Florida is a long way from Sacramento, but the story has traveled. Everyone you meet at All-Star Weekend wants to hear about how Sacramento has managed one of the great municipal recoveries in sports history, yanking a team back home after another city had a contract ready to sign, seal and steal. “ http://www.thinkbigsacramento.com/assets/Press-Releases/Sacramento-Miracle-Talk-of-Town-in-Orlando-022612.pdf  Why then does it appear the Maloofs are continuously looking to relocate?

It appears a story has again traveled that the Maloofs can not work with someone they do not trust. http://insidebiz.com/news/sources-sacramento-kings-may-move-virginia-beach-arena-deal-works

While Virginia Beach city counsel meets to discuss building a new arena which could possibly house our Sacramento Kings why isn't our city counsel meeting to determine if Sacramento -while thinking big- used unethical strong arm tactics to attempt to sell and steal the Kings from the Maloofs?

Are we thieves? Did we fight to keep the Kings by any means necessary? Were we going to dribble our integrity for a game of sports? Do you think our actions were foul?

Why would the Maloofs want to stay in a city that attempted to steal their team? Why is Think Big spreading rumors the Maloofs do not care about Sacramento when it seems we did not care about the Maloofs and attempted to keep the team by thievery? 

Thank You

Rhonda Erwin
Sacramento City Resident

Below is the Sports Illustrated Article highlighting Sacramento Mayor Johnson attempt to steal the Sacramento Kings from the Maloofs.

After reading it  perhaps we should ask ourselves why would the Maloofs want to stay in Sacramento?

“SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Before the mudslinging became a routine public affair here, the harsh words between city officials and the Maloof family that owns the Kings were typically kept behind closed doors.

And so it was in the late morning of March 29 inside a conference room at Old City Hall, where Mayor and former NBA point guard Kevin Johnson dished his dirt while speaking to about 25 members of the Kings' A-list team sponsors. Despite all the excitement surrounding the handshake deal for a new downtown arena made more than a month before, Johnson -- who raised some $10 million from these same business leaders the year before as a way of showing the league how badly the Maloofs had mismanaged this market -- had a warning for the group.

He told them that a bit of bad arena news "might be coming out of L.A.," as one source who was in the room remembered, a clear foreshadowing of the Los Angeles Times report published just hours later that detailed the Maloofs' concerns about the deal and raised the possibility yet again that they might be on the move. Johnson … said the Maloofs "should be ashamed to show their faces in Sacramento," the source said, then offered an unsolicited reminder that his Plan B was still very much in play: Ron Burkle.

A year after Johnson partnered with the L.A.-based billionaire to put pressure on the Maloofs to sell the Kings, sources say he remains in constant contact with Burkle and is still hopeful that he will eventually take over the team and keep it in Sacramento. Burkle, the Pittsburgh Penguins' owner who was ranked 107th on Forbes' list of richest people in America last year (net worth of $3.2 billion), was a major part of Johnson's pitch to stop the Maloofs from moving to Anaheim.

This push to force the Maloofs out was already underway on Thursday, when 26 Sacramento business owners sent a letter to NBA commissioner David Stern urging him to "strongly encourage" the family to sell. That message came directly from Johnson's camp for the first time on Sunday, by way of a 1,853-word letter sent to members of Johnson's regional initiative, "Think Big Sacramento

Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/sam_amick/04/16/sacramento.kings/index.html#ixzz24iZIglVk
 

 

Editor's note: Edits have been made to names in this article after publishing.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

edited on  August 27, 2012 | 1:43 AM
It was my intention to include Mike Salk, ESPN writer's response to the embarrassing letter we sent to Hansen: "misguided Think Big Sacramento" http://mynorthwest.com/422/627670/The-letter-Christopher-Hansen-should-write-back-to-the-clown-from-Think-Big-Sacramento

It seems we should clear up this mess apologize for our sell-us-your-team-or-we'll-block-your-every-move-send-scathing-letters-to-cities-showing-interest-tell-everyone-you're-in-debt-regardless-of-whether-you-can-make-a-profit-in-our-city. Then we should move forward with integrity thinking big to obtain a professional sports team for sacramento that doesn't have to be strong-armed into being here. This is embarrassing, we look desparate a city scorned with no self-respect. Is this the way a "world-class" city behaves? (Now, I can move on and now I'm done with this unsettling subject)
1 2
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 8:30 AM
This fiasco just shows what a waste of time, money, and energy this whole effort has been. There is clearly no wherewithal in the city to keep the team, no one has the money or desire to fund an arena, and the Maloofs do not want to stay here. The owners do not want to properly fund the franchise so it can be competitive. What pleasure is there in any of this? None.

It's time to let go of the Kings.
5 1
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 10:54 AM
I agree it's time to let go and especially since we let go of our dignity in an attempt to keep them.
1 2
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 9:56 AM
I think this city's, and in particular this mayor's, efforts to keep the kings in this market are a fantastic showing of community pride, determination, strength, ability, business savvy and political maturity, and speak volumes to the point that this town is on the verge of cityhood.

Some things are worth fighting for...and while Rhonda may not share many's view that the Kings once represented this regions aspirations...or that under Maloof's "leadership" the Kings have decayed into a cynical rescue vehicle for the family Maloof...I am glad we're in the rough-and-tumble of big league play.

Keep up the good fight.
3 5
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 10:54 AM
I appreciate and respect your opinion. I’ve never said I didn’t believe the Kings once represented this regions aspirations... I believe Sac is a city worth fighting for. I respect leaders who put up the "good" fight for “our city” I’d rather be a city known for fighting with integrity than one fighting under deceit. It appears Johnson was attempting to win a victory for himself (and hide behind Think Big) and not for our city since he didn't care how foolish we appear. Our fight was not "good" so we temporarily won a battle but ended up losing the war. To fight just for the sake of fighting- in vain- is pointless. I don't see political maturity in our actions. I can’t believe this deceitful underhanded tactic will be an isolated incident. This deceitful tactic is an indication we have to closely watch our mayor as he will attempt to get what he wants (for himself) even at the risk of making the city look bad or not benefiting the city. It’s not okay just because the dirty tactics were done to someone else; heck we need to take heed……I can’t dismiss this because we want a NBA team. I agree some things are worth fighting for and I certainly don’t have an issue with fighting; my issue is how we went about it. When some people can't back up their position they resort to dirty tactics. The Maloofs said this deal would hurt Sacramento; why didn't we fight / prove the deal would benefit Sac instead of fighting dirty… And a true leader would not of had to fight dirty they could have brought down the Maloofs resistance without fighting- by showing them a beneficial profit margin. Our actions didn’t put us in the big leagues.; we're deemed as one writer suggested "misguided" "clowns"
0 2
REPLY
edited on  September 3, 2012 | 11:29 AM
MyQuest as you say the Kings were important to the region. Not so much to the residents of the City of Sacramento. At least that's my impression. The suburbanites in this region always complain about not having amenities but aren't willing to put their money where their mouths are. There is a lot of resentment and ampthay towards the City and i think people in the City of Sacramento are getting tired of this. Years ago the County residents had a chance pay for a new arena by increasing their taxes by a measly quarter of a cent and they refused. There's a lot of blame to go around here regarding the Kings but let's not forget the suburban fan base which could not convince their neighbors to pony up.
0 0
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 11:52 AM
Rhonda, have you researched how the NBA - the major negotiators of the deal - felt about the city's conduct relative to the Maloofs or any other party?
3 0
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 12:51 PM
I haven't read much of the NBA or Sterns reactions to our conduct. I don't expect to read a blistering attack on our conduct since I believe the NBA relies on publicly subsidized arenas. To blast a city may ruffles feathers down the road with other cities or with Sac if we’re looking for another team to host. Sadly, I think they’re remaining neutral to follow the money and not character/ integrity. I also read the Kings have the NBA’s smallest payroll and barely exceeded the league’s minimum payroll level last year. So I can't see the NBA rejecting the Kings moving when it could benefit the NBA with having another publicly subsidized arena in another city/ state.

I read Stern had stated, they (us and Maloofs) did "what we asked them to" in order to finance a new arena… Utilizing a third-party economist -- one that Stern said came into ongoing negotiations "with ill grace" -- the Maloofs produced documents that predicted that the city of Sacramento would be in bad financial shape after moving forward with a partially publicly financed arena... Stern is further quoted as saying "I am extremely disappointed, on behalf of Maloofs and city of Sacramento, but I think that there's nothing further to be done. " I haven't read anything specifically on where his disappointment rest.
1 2
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 1:24 PM
Also, Ben thank you and a special thanks/ appreciation to Sac Press for giving us a forum to discuss our concerns and publicly speak to our elected officials. Going to city hall to speak for 2 minutes and have blank stares with no response from the mayor/ council because the matter is not on the agenda is getting exhausting. Thank you for providing another option if we have city-related concerns we want to discuss.

In regards to your comment I want to add, I think the NBA is in an uncomfortable position; stuck between a rock and a hard place, if they side with the city they could cause concerns by other team owners. What team owner wants to know a city can steal their team if they threaten to leave and the NBA will side with them? If the NBA sides with the owners they can cause concerns with other cities... Perhaps it's best they stay silent and let the chips fall where they may. lol Just my opinion, I'm in no way an expert on sports or sports matters for me this was about integrity or lack thereof.
2 2
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 12:43 PM
hey, rhonda. i believe you mean CHRIS hansen, not STEVE hansen in your article. steve is sacramento's next city councilmember representing district 4. thank you! www.steve4sac.com @steve4sac
0 2
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 12:59 PM
LOL: I am so sorry and thank you! The name did sound familiar! lol If I may ask, what is your feelings on Sacramento's conduct?
0 2
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 1:15 PM
Thanks again, Thomas. We made an edit to the story.
0 0
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 1:29 PM
Rhonda, I think you forgot one pointed, important question:

Who is funding Think Big?
3 2
REPLY
edited on  August 27, 2012 | 1:59 PM
Mike, I am not sure who is funding Think Big; but whoever is funding them they may want to reconsider throwing good money after both bad money and conduct
0 1
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 2:25 PM
Well, it is important, because what if it turns out it's AEG and Goldman Sachs? Then you'd also have a bit of a scandal on your hands.
3 2
REPLY
August 27, 2012 | 2:48 PM
Mike, I absolutely agree it is very important. I just haven't looked into it yet heck until you mentioned it I was going to let it go after venting... I'm not claiming to run a one man (woman) show. I don't have all the answers nor am I suggesting I have all the questions to ask. That's why I appreciate the comments of everyone because we're all a puzzle piece and together we bring the picture together. Commenting can lead to a domino effect of questions, answers and solutions
1 1
REPLY
September 3, 2012 | 12:37 AM
This article begins to answer (well, ask really) that very question: http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/k-j-inc/content?oid=7177019
0 0
REPLY
September 3, 2012 | 11:04 AM
I think that there has been less than respectful behavior all the way around - including the Maloofs. The Maloofs agreed to the deal, initially, then the said that they questioned the City's funding plan. What they did was take an opportunity to look good when, in fact, they didn't have the money required to follow through with their end of the deal. So, le't make sure this is included in the conversation and the Maloofs don't get a pass here.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background