STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Bike shop owner petitions to keep bike path access to Old Sacramento open

by Melissa Corker, published on August 23, 2012 at 8:41 AM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 4
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 4
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

California State Parks is considering a plan to close off bicycle access to Old Sacramento at one of only two access points along the Sacramento River Bike Trail, and local bike shop owner Tim Castleman says that is unacceptable – so he started a petition to stop the closure from happening.

Castleman, owner of Practical Cycle in Old Sacramento, started the petition in early August after he discovered that the Old Sacramento State Historic Park General Plan calls for the closure. He said he felt the issue had not been fully addressed during project planning or public outreach.

“Nobody was really pushing back against it,” Castleman said Wednesday. “I wanted to make sure that it was clear that there is a lot of people that don’t want it closed.”

Response to the petition has been positive so far, he said, with more than 150 signatures, and he hopes the interest in the issue continues to grow.

According to Castleman’s petition statement on change.org, the closure of the bike path at I Street would eliminate “the single most popular way to exit the bike trail to Old Sacramento and the Downtown area.”

The petition calls for opposition to the planned closure, opting instead to support repairs to the existing bike path.

“If they are going to make an alternate access, I’m OK with it – I just don’t want them to abandon the I Street exit altogether until after another, better, safe access is made,” Castleman said.

Paul Hammond, museum director for the California State Railroad Museum said the planned closure is not a recommendation in a vacuum – there are a lot of things that play into it.

“We are not trying to close off access, we are trying to relocate it,” Hammond said.

California State Parks owns and operates only a portion of Old Sacramento – the remainder is owned either by the city of Sacramento or by private owners and operators. The portion that the state owns includes the I Street access from the Sacramento River Bike Trail, and Hammond said that access point feeds bicyclists directly into the state-owned portion of Old Sacramento where a number of park programs, tours and events are often held.

“Park programs mean crowds, and bikes and crowds don’t mix well,” Hammond said.

The plan includes proposed alternative access points to Old Sacramento from the bike trail, Hammond said, which will reduce potential bicyclist/pedestrian conflict and make traveling into and through Old Sacramento safer for everyone.

One of those alternative routes is slated to be north of the railroad museum, Hammond said, and would lead bicyclists to an intersection at Second Street where they can then either go into Old Sacramento, go toward the railyards or head into downtown.

That creates another point of contention for Castleman: The intersection that the alternate route would lead to is a busy, three-way inlet to Old Sacramento where tour buses often park to unload tourists.

“It just doesn’t seem safe to push everyone into that bottleneck intersection,” Castleman said.

Jordan Lang, project assistant at Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates, said his organization has also expressed concerns about the proposed closure of the I Street bicycle access.

“We call it a significant adverse impact to the project if they did that, unless they found a suitable alternative route for bike riders,” Lang said Wednesday.

The I Street access to the Sacramento River Bike Trail is an “informal and unofficial” access route that was never designed or designated for bicycles, Lang said – yet it is the only suitable route that exists.

“It is a gap in the concrete flood wall that runs along the river,” Lang said. “It is a rough access, through gravel and over tracks. It can be challenging.”

Castleman said he’s not looking for a fight, he just wants a safe, easy way into Old Sacramento for bicyclists.

“In a way, this is a great opportunity,” Castleman said. “That patch of bike path needs improvement, and this is a good time to do it, along with the whole project.”

The general plan is subject to a long process that includes opportunity for public comment. The formal comment period closed July 16, and comments are currently being reviewed by project managers at California State Parks, Lang said. No formal response is expected for a few months.

Read the California State Parks preliminary general plan for Old Sacramento here.

Read the petition on change.org here.

Melissa Corker is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Facebook and on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

Keep up with our political coverage with our weekly newsletter, Sacto Politico. It goes out every Wednesday morning and includes a summary of all the week's political news affecting the capital city, with links to all the interesting, must-read stories from newspapers, magazines and blogs. It also features the best of our live chat series, Sac Press Live. Sign me up!

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

August 23, 2012 | 11:51 AM
I see nothing wrong with moving access to north of the Rail Museum. The majority of bike riders who take the I st. exit are commuting to downtown anyway. And those rail tracks at that spot are trecherous!
3 3
REPLY
August 23, 2012 | 5:31 PM
Yes, there are many commuters that would prefer bypassing Old Sacramento but there are also many who ride to Old Sacramento to dine, shop and enjoy the museums and special events such as the St Patrick's day Parade, Sacramento Music Festival, Gold Rush Days, Theatre of Lights, New Years Fireworks, Raley Field for baseball games, etc. Forcing all these through the intersection at 2nd & I would make visiting Old Sacramento dangerous and less desirable for all of these visitors. Tourists also like the safe and convenient access from Old Sacramento to the bike trails so it makes sense to improve access rather than hiding it behind the RR museum and forcing riders to navigate that busy intersection. That said I am 100% in favor of also providing a bypass for commuters, AFTER the current trail and access are improved to safely accomodate all users.
2 1
REPLY
August 26, 2012 | 9:59 AM
Exactly, the only thing that Castleman doesn't like about this plan is that it would interfere with his bicycle rental business. Anyone looking objective at the plan (it has a 20 year scope) would see that access to Old Sac and downtown would actually be improved by the plan. The fact that Castleman only wants a bypass for commuters and other cyclist "AFTER" other access issues are addressed show exactly who he is looking out for, number 1.
0 2
REPLY
August 23, 2012 | 12:37 PM
Move it, but don't close access without the alternative open.

Also, I'm curious, was there a particular incident that precipitated this move? I use that access pointa all the time and have not seen the massing of people in that area as described. I take thoughtful and safe routes around here on bike and as a pedestrian and I never thought of that as a pain point at all.
4 0
REPLY
August 23, 2012 | 6:52 PM
Data driven decisions from a government bureaucrat? Funny stuff Ben!
2 0
REPLY
August 23, 2012 | 1:10 PM
As long as there is a viable and safe alternative, but make sure there is always access and not shut one down to make it better sometime down the road (in the future).
1 0
REPLY
August 23, 2012 | 4:53 PM
It should also be noted...the stretch of the bike path is used by tourist from the hotels near Richards Blvd as well as tourist renting bikes in Old Sac and then heading north along the trail. Folks entering the trail on R Street and other points south of Old Sac also use this portion to get to Discovery Park. My understanding is the city is looking to maximize the number of visitors to the Power Museum who will come by something other than a car.

This guy could get a job with the city..he thinks just like them... only from the viewpoint of the bureaucrat and never with any consideration of the users of the service or the public paying his salary.

The reporter might have provided the address for the bike shop...most Sacramentans don't know there are more than candy and t shirt shops in Old Sac.
3 1
REPLY
August 23, 2012 | 5:18 PM
Thanks for all the support, discussion to provide safe and convenient access to Old Sacramento for bikes and pedestrians is underway.
2 0
REPLY
August 23, 2012 | 7:58 PM
My husband and I want to sign the petition but it seems to be closed?
1 0
REPLY
August 26, 2012 | 9:54 AM
Unfortunately, Mr. Castleman doesn't like this plan only because it disturbs his business model of a bike rental service in Old Sacramento. If you look at the CSRM plans you can see that bicycle access around and through Old Sacramento is in fact enhanced, it just doesn't pass as close to Practical Cycles anymore. Mr. Castleman has been pretty silent on the issue of improving the current access of bicycles to Old Sacramento (like bike racks, bike path improvements, bike path signs) because he doesn't care about cyclists riding into and through Old Sac, he just wants to rent bikes to tourists.
1 2
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background