STORYLINE Sac Press Live

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Sac Press Live chat: Food truck regulation in Sacramento

by Baryo Dee, published on August 19, 2012 at 5:43 PM

Storyline: Sac Press Live RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

The Sacramento weather is not the only thing blazing this summer. The debate over food truck regulation has kicked up a few notches as well.

Tune in Aug. 29 from noon to 1 p.m. for a Sac Press Live chat discussing whether cities have the right to regulate food trucks. Hear from Chris Jarosz, president of California Mobile Food Association (CalMFA), Matt Geller, CEO of Southern California Mobile Food Vendors Association (SoCalMFVA), Daniel Conway, legislative and public affairs director of California Restaurant Association (CRA), and Sacramento  City Councilman Jay Scheiner. 

The Sacramento-based CMFA is speaking with state legislators on drafting legislation allowing cities to regulate mobile food vendors. This comes shortly after the city of Sacramento, mobile food vendors and restaurant owners agreed to draft a new mobile food ordinance set for a vote this fall.

While some mobile food vendors are praising the less-restrictive ordinance, others would prefer no regulation outside of adhering to public health codes. SoCalMFVA recently wrote a letter admonishing CalMFA for discussing state-wide legislation.

The Sacramento Press will chat with Jarosz, Geller and Conway to discuss their thoughts on the current challenges faced by mobile food vendors, feelings toward city-regulated mobile food vending and steps moving forward.

The chat will be live streamed on SacramentoPress.com - just come back to this article on Wednesday at noon and you’ll see a window with the chat. You can join the conversation by submitting questions in the comment section below:
 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

August 19, 2012 | 6:30 PM
What I fail to understand is why the city is inserting itself in this issue to begin with.

1. The city is not regulating health and safety...which should be the extent of any public interest. The city is picking winners and losers

2. If Council members would ever patronize the trucks..they would find out food from the trucks is in the same price range as restaurants. The trucks may not have the same costs as brick and mortar restaurants..but they have their own unique costs which eliminate any real price advantage..
2 1
REPLY
August 20, 2012 | 9:24 AM
#2 is a great point & one that doesn't get brought up often enough. I don't go to a truck to save money, I go because I want what they're selling! It's another option - pure & simple.
2 0
REPLY
August 20, 2012 | 10:13 AM
Good points. Could not agree more.
1 0
REPLY
August 23, 2012 | 10:57 AM
i thought the city wasn't allowed to regulate beyond health and safety? that's what i read in another story on this (bee?)
0 0
REPLY
August 24, 2012 | 12:44 AM
Rogertang, they aren't thats the point
2 0
REPLY
August 29, 2012 | 11:18 AM
Rogertang, how long have you lived in Kalifornia? The government at all levels does whatever it wants.
2 0
REPLY
August 29, 2012 | 12:13 PM
I am confused. CalTrans says the city may only regulate for health and safety; the legislature says the city may only regulate for health and safety. Why does the city think that the state law does not apply to them?
1 1
REPLY
August 29, 2012 | 12:17 PM
OK, and I just looked up court decisions - the state courts also say that cities may not regulate for purposes of limiting competition or protecting business, but only for public health and safety. Are we saying it's OK for the city of sacramento to propose rules that violate current law and court decisions? i am really confused as to what's going on. Why would the city do that? doesn't it open taxpayers up to a big liability, as seems to have happened in many other cities?
2 1
REPLY
August 29, 2012 | 12:39 PM
What evidence is there that the food truck business hurts the brick and mortar restaurants. Weren't the restaurants hurting way before the arrival of food trucks?
2 0
REPLY
August 29, 2012 | 1:07 PM
the city doesn't need evidence apparently ... they just need "campaign assistance" from restaurant owners.

i'm sure if food truck owners were just as generous then they wouldn't have the rules that dictate how they do business written by restaurants.
2 1
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background