STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

RT: Slow start for Green Line is part of the plan

by Melissa Corker, published on July 27, 2012 at 7:10 PM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

The Green Line light rail segment's slow start with relatively low ridership, is part of the plan, officials say.

Regional Transit’s newest light rail segment has only seen about 150 riders a day, Tony Bizjak reported in Friday’s Sacramento Bee – a low number for a $44 million project that opened with great pomp and circumstance in June.

However, Regional Transit Executive Director Michael Wiley disputes those numbers, saying the Green Line has actually been averaging closer to 300 riders per day – and it’s a number he said he’s comfortable with.

“Our expectation wasn’t that we were going to achieve really high ridership numbers right off the bat,” Wiley said. “Our plan all along was to start with a somewhat minimal level of service and then add service as demand grows.”

Previous transit projects were built in places with an existing ridership and were additions to an established community, Wiley said. The Green Line started with a different purpose, however: It took more of an “if you build it, they will come” approach.

“The expectation has always been that, if transit is there, development will occur around transit,” Wiley said.

But that doesn’t satisfy some critics who say RT’s “train to nowhere” was a mistake because it doesn’t serve a large enough population to justify the cost – and development isn’t happening that will change that.

“Is there a dense population of people along the route from Richards (Boulevard) to the airport? No, not even close,” wrote Sacramento Press reader Dan Scott. “Is there a chance that there will be development in that area? No, not for a long time, as it was re-designated as a floodplain and no new houses or business can be built unless they are elevated approx 20 feet.”

Township 9 Principal Developer Ron Mellon said Friday that the notion that development at Township 9 is dead is misleading.

“Nothing could be farther from the truth,” Mellon said.

The 64-acre mixed use development project at Township 9 is located between Richards Boulevard, North 5th Street, North 7th Street and the American River, about one mile from downtown. It includes 18 lots that will eventually offer 2,500 housing units and nearly 800,000 square feet of commercial, office and retail space.

“We are trying to double the size of the downtown core,” Mellon said. “When people see what we’re going to do out there, they’ll be blown away.”

But first things first, Mellon said, and that means completing the unseen infrastructure work before breaking ground on the first building.

The infrastructure portion of the first phase – roads, curbs, lighting, and the like – is nearly complete, and construction will begin on a 180-unit apartment complex sometime around November, Mellon said.

Still, Assistant Project Manager Noah Lane said some perspective is needed.

“Rome wasn’t built in a day, and Township 9 won’t be, either,” Lane said.

Considering the scope of the project, Lane said it wouldn’t be possible to build it all at once, and at full buildout, the cost would be between $2 billion and $3 billion, which Lane said would be a stretch for even the largest local developers.

Lane said the owners of Township 9 are developing it in phases and will likely partner with other developers on some of the project’s 18 lots to get them all built. The first phase of the project has a five year buildout plan, according to Mellon.

Meanwhile, Wiley said, the Green Line is a valuable investment that is driving development in the River District and Township 9 at a time when there is little development happening in other parts of the city.

“I don’t know how quickly the tide is going to turn and we’ll go back to the pace that was happening six or seven years ago,” Wiley said, “but there’s no question that without the Green Line, many current developments wouldn’t be happening.”

RESULTS FROM YESTERDAY'S POLL:

We asked Sac Press readers if the Green Line was a good investment, and nearly 57 percent responded "Yes – it will eventually be an important part of Sacramento's regional transit infrastructure and be a great way to get to Natomas and the airport."

Another 23.5 percent said "It's too early to tell," and 17.5 percent said "No – it costs too much and it'll be too long before it goes anywhere."

Melissa Corker is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Facebook and on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

July 27, 2012 | 7:40 PM
Is one month of operation, on a branch line that was deliberately laid out ahead of development, really enough time to gauge the success or failure of the Green Line?
4 2
REPLY
July 27, 2012 | 7:53 PM
Get the line out to the Airport!! I've been a critic, and still am - that SACOG & RT find it acceptable to take 13 years to build 12 miles of track. Connect the airport - not so much for residents, but for people flying into town - they can ride into D/T, M/T and East Sac... then ride out without ever needing a car. That alone is worthwhile - add in the thousands of people who'd rather ride out to the airport (and/or connect via Capitol Corridor from Roseville or Auburn) instead of paying the cab fare, or parking at the airport. This leg of the RT makes more sense than any... speed it up while contractors need work!
2 0
REPLY
July 27, 2012 | 8:29 PM
We could have an express bus running every half-hour between Sacramento Valley Station and the airport next month--which would fill that gap quite effectively until the rest of the Green Line is completed--and yes, it is going to take a decade or two for that part.
1 1
REPLY
July 28, 2012 | 3:56 PM
Could such a bus run a dedicated lane. Is there enough room on I-5 for a bus-only shoulder lane?
0 0
REPLY
July 28, 2012 | 9:31 PM
Considering that the airport just raised its parking prices to pay the tab for the new terminal, you have to wonder if the delay in extending light rail to the airport is really just an excuse for them to continue collecting the excessive parking rates they charge for another 13 years.
2 1
REPLY
July 29, 2012 | 9:39 AM
Mark: That would add to cost and complexity of such a system--eventually you'd just be installing a BRT line, which costs about as much as light rail. There might be room on I-5 for a bus-only shoulder lane, but it is unlikely that giving up even a shoulder (in an area that gets congested frequently and needs maintenance) would be all that easy, especially since the bus would still have to enter and exit using the same on and off ramps as the rest of traffic, then merge to a bus-only lane.
0 0
REPLY
July 28, 2012 | 7:18 AM
Getting a bus from the Sac Int'l to the Amtrak station until rail lines are built seems like a no brainer. What is the hesitation? Every city has transit from their airport to different parts of the city. Why hasn't this happened yet? When traveling to other cities I see how far behind we really are.

And I reiterate previous commenters, 13 years to build SacRT to the airport???
2 1
REPLY
July 29, 2012 | 9:44 AM
Yes, 13 years. This isn't an easy project, as it requires building a bridge crossing over the American River, building a new light rail line through two already established neighborhoods, and finally (and possibly most controversially) through greenfield that still tends to flood when the weather gets squirrelly. Also, refer to bweber4's comment below--we already have a bus to the airport, it's just not a very visible or frequent bus.
0 0
REPLY
July 28, 2012 | 5:35 PM
once a hour yolo bus 42 does go between dt and the airport! you people are idjits
3 0
REPLY
July 29, 2012 | 9:42 AM
It seems some aren't aware of Yolobus 42 to the airport (the idjits in question) but there are problems with the current bus--it doesn't run often enough or late enough (a 24 hour airport requires a 24 hour shuttle) and its stops are just kind of randomly placed around downtown at places that aren't that ideal for sitting around with luggage. A Sac Valley/Airport dedicated shuttle bus line would run from an already-established transit hub that is staffed 24 hours and has a lot more places to sit and wait with luggage.
0 0
REPLY
July 30, 2012 | 10:41 AM
That's GREAT news that Township 9 is progressing! I had heard the opposite. I am very excited now!
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background