STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Sacramento Natural Foods Co-op relocation plan raises questions

by Melissa Corker, published on July 5, 2012 at 7:36 AM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

Soon after we published an article about a community meeting held by the Sacramento Natural Foods Co-op to present preliminary designs for its new location to residents and and business owners who might be impacted by the move, questions started pouring in, and parking-related questions topped the list.

“Why are they building another huge street-fronted parking lot in the urban core,” Sacramento Press reader Tom Runge asked in a story comment. “This will do nothing but create more dead space for the area.”

The co-op’s plan to move from its Alhambra Boulevard at S Street location to a new, larger store four blocks away at 28th and R streets has largely received positive feedback, according to urban planner and co-op representative Wendy Hoyt, but she said it’s early in the process and there are still details to be ironed out.

“The design is still being worked on, so there may be some adjustments here and there before we take it to the city,” Hoyt said.

[Update: 10:05 a.m.] The co-op has also produced video on the proposed relocation program:

Sac Press commenters had a few follow-up questions and suggestions.

“Why not put the parking on the roof instead and make it more bike and pedestrian-friendly?” Runge asked.

Rooftop parking sometimes makes sense in very compact urban development, according to Bob Lindley, lead architect on the co-op project, but for this project it would not be feasible – both because of the added expense, and because it conflicts with other construction and design priorities from the co-op.

“Land value has to be very high to justify the added cost,” Lindley said in an email.

Lindley said co-op planners are working to include many sustainable design features for the new site, including natural daylight via skylights and and an atrium to help keep the store cool – features that would be impossible tucked under a parking slab.

Steve Maviglio, co-op board president, said in a follow-up comment that the co-op is exploring the use of the roof for solar panels and possibly community gardening so it is effectively utilized.

Other parking concerns from commenters related to a shift in available parking from current surface lots and street parking to the construction of a parking garage across the street at 29th and S streets.

Parking is at a premium in downtown and Midtown, and Sac Press reader George Raya said it is especially problematic for staffers at the Department of Human Assistance building at 1725 28th St.

Raya said DHA employees compete for parking with their clients and with state workers who work nearby. Any reduction to the available spaces would cause a real problem, he said.

“Fights have broken out over parking,” Raya said. “It’s really rough here.”

The planned parking structure should mitigate some of those problems, Hoyt said. It would provide replacement parking for the current surface DHA lot, she said, and double the amount of current parking for the co-op.

Another commenter suggested opening more locations would be a better “expansion” for the co-op because it would eliminate the need for people to drive their cars to the store.

Maviglio’s response to the reader acknowledged the desire to encourage more use of public transportation, but said that, for many who shop at the co-op, that isn’t an option.

“A good chunk of our business is from beyond the city limits and the suburbs where public transportation isn't available,” Maviglio said.

Despite the many questions surrounding the project, Hoyt said she is glad for all of them and looks forward to receiving more.

“This is exactly the healthy kind of dialogue one would hope for on a key project like SNFC,” Hoyt said. “We look forward to further discussions with the public.”

The co-op has not yet filed a building application with the city Community Development Department Planning Division, Hoyt said, but expects to move forward with that step in the next few months.

Melissa Corker is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Facebook and on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

July 5, 2012 | 9:11 AM
Thanks for your continuing focus on the Co-op's relocation. FYI, we held four meetings for our owners on the move, hosted Facebook discussions, had in-store Q&A, neighborhood meetings and produced this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTlb_n52Adk. As the developer pointed out, these comments are great to read as the project moves forward. The Co-op is excited about improving our ability to be the trusted source for natural foods in Sacramento and appreciates the support of our community.
3 0
REPLY
July 5, 2012 | 9:57 AM
Thanks. We'll add the video to the story.
3 0
REPLY
July 5, 2012 | 12:56 PM
I strongly support this move. It's long overdue. I only live 3 blocks from light-rail and would totally use it to shop @ the co-op IF it would run more frequently. I'm not going to wait 20-40 minutes in the hot sun for a train while my butter melts and my lettuce wilts. Anyway, I think all the complaints about the design are nitpicky and unrealistic.
4 1
REPLY
July 5, 2012 | 3:12 PM
While I agree that I'm excited, the nitpicky complaints might yield a better design. That's why the Co-op wanted to hear them. It also might expedite the process if neighbors are onboard from day one.

If you are interested in butter not melting and walking in the central city then having a plan for shade trees next to sidewalks and such are nitpicky, but needed considerations.
1 2
REPLY
edited on  July 5, 2012 | 7:15 PM
The RT Gold Line runs every 15 minutes until about 7:30 PM, and the 29th Street light rail station (the one closest to both the current Co-Op location and the proposed one) is underneath the Capitol City Freeway and thus in shade pretty much all the time. Get one of those insulated reusable cooler bags to hold your butter and lettuce if you're worried about wilting.

I'd agree that the rooftop parking idea is pretty unrealistic--it adds considerably to the cost of a building, and the neighborhood is mostly 1-3 story residential and industrial, not the highest-density of land uses. Design, that's in the eye of the beholder--and the person beholding the checkbook.
0 2
REPLY
July 8, 2012 | 10:02 AM
And I'm not against community input. Nor do I consider ALL the suggestions/complaints to be nitpicky or unrealistic. I'm a member of the co-op and shop their almost exclusively and it's pretty much in my neighborhood so I think I know a little about the realities of the parking situation. George is worried about his parking space. And there's no doubt that there's going to be conflict here re. county employee parking. That's not the co-op's problem. That's the county's problem. They need to find replacement parking nearby for their employees.

Thanks for the shade tips guys. I guess I was thinking more about me melting and wilting in 100+ degree temps waiting for LR at the stop near my home. As for LR running every 15 minutes-- yup that what it says it does alright. The reality however is something different. I'll never stop complaining about LR until they get their act together.
1 1
REPLY
July 10, 2012 | 10:22 AM
Oh, boo hoo. What a horrible thing, waiting a half hour to get a car-free ride. Jeez, Americans have become a bunch of whining softies.

Get a clue, dude, we cannot just keep having everything perfectly our way, it's just not sustainable.
0 1
REPLY
edited on  July 5, 2012 | 1:13 PM
While I commend the Co-op for their outreach, one important stakeholder group has been left out - the County employees who use the 160 spaces in the current parking lot. During the work-week we patronize local businesses. Some of us even shop and have lunch at the Co-op. To date, the 300 employees who work across the street from the current parking lot have never been invited to any of the community meetings. Please a least inform us when future community meetings are to be held. We are part of the neighborhood.
1 1
REPLY
July 5, 2012 | 2:29 PM
One of the first moves the developers made was to meet with the representatives of employees at the County facility to get their consent. Also, our meetings on the issue have been open to all. That said, I'm sure we'll work with the developer to ensure that workers there are kept to date on the progress we're making at the new site, as we appreciate your patronage.
1 0
REPLY
July 8, 2012 | 7:01 PM
What the county needs to deal with is why so few of their employees use mass transit. Not only is there a light rail stop within a block, but also a number of bus lines on 29th and 30th. If these folks are getting free parking (well free except that taxpayers are picking up the costs) they are getting something few other urban workers get.
1 0
REPLY
July 5, 2012 | 3:15 PM
I've heard that the Co-op and the developers met with managers representing the Department of Human Assistance. However, no information has trickled-down to the employees.
1 1
REPLY
edited on  July 8, 2012 | 4:33 PM
Why are they building another huge street-fronted parking lot in the urban core???

Because only people with cars make shopping trips with sufficient quantity for a grocery store with selection larger than a "hole in the wall" to function. That's why.

Welcome to the Real World.

So far only Mark (hat tip) makes any real world observations about using the rails to shop--and he is promptly told to shut up, go queue up, and be a New Soviet Trolleycar Man, while his milk sours and his produce wilts. But GUM (pronounced "Goom") won't work for the Co-Op either.

During commute hours on the rail, Mark can be New Standing Room Only Jostling and Dropping Shopping Bags And Losing Their Contents Man, and during non-commute hours Mark can be New Crime Victim Man. Not delightful choices for Mark.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background