STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

How Hansen rallied his base on election day in the District 4

by Melissa Corker, published on June 6, 2012 at 7:29 AM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 5
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 5
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

It wasn’t a victory speech that let Sacramento know Steve Hansen was the top vote-getter in the race for City Council District 4, it was a victory tweet – but what would you expect from a candidate whose campaign was propelled to success on a digital platform in a new-media world?

"We're done...for now. thank you," he tweeted.

Hansen finished the primary election Tuesday with 2,317 votes – 28.5 percent of the total.

He will have his work cut out for him in the runoff however, as he finished just 86 votes ahead of architect and political veteran Joe Yee who had 2,231 votes (27.5 percent).  Phyllis Newton, meanwhile, received 1,798 (22.19 percent) and Terry Schanz  finished with 1,213 votes (14.97 percent).  The top Land Park candidates  – Yee, Newton and Schanz –  together tallied 5,242 votes, or  2,925 more than Hansen, the one candidate from the central city. If Yee can bring in Newton's and Schanz's supporters, he will have the advantage in November. 

[Read the full break down on the county's election results page


A lot can happen between now and then, and it would be wrong to count Hansen out. While Newton was the most prolific fundraiser in the race - bringing in $150,000, Hansen came in second with $130,000, according to the Sacramento News & Revew. Hansen has on his side an enthusiastic core of young supporters and volunteers (think Obama 08) and a web savvy campaign. Both factors were evident on election night. 

On Tuesday his headquarters was a hive of activity, buzzing with the energy of nearly 70 volunteers who, in addition to making phone calls and going door to door, also utilized Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google Maps and texting.

Hansen and 10-yr-old Daisy Lewis share a high-five (Image by: Melissa Corker) Hansen’s volunteer corps was a kaleidoscope of people who represented a broad cross-section of Sacramento: from the student representative on the Sacramento City Unified School District board to the elderly funeral home director, the mid-30s law school graduate to the 10-year-old neighbor who helped by watching Hansen’s dog when he was out walking precincts.

All that new-media savvy appeared and volunteer enthusiasm paid off as election night poll results started pouring in and Hansen had earned a spot in the November runoff as one of the top two vote-getters in the District 4 race. 

Howard Papworth (Image by: Melissa Corker) Earlier in the day, 62-year-old funeral director Howard Papworth sat on a sofa in the front room of Hansen’s Midtown Victorian home-turned campaign headquarters, making phone calls to voters, keeping notes and updating lists of Hansen supporters.

Papworth said he first got involved in politics during the 1960 election for John F. Kennedy, and he feels a similar “vibe” from the Hansen campaign.

“City Council needs a Steve Hansen – very badly,” Papworth said. “He’ll bring fresh ideas, which is what we need.”

While Papworth made calls from the living room, other volunteers scattered around the house and out onto the front porch worked on smartphones or laptops, posting to Facebook or Tweeting about campaign activities, or pouring over maps of the district.

Thomas Dodson uploads a new Hansen video to Facebook (Image by: Melissa Corker) Thomas Dodson, 35, is a tall, slender, serious-looking young professional and a social media consultant by trade. Dodson sat in a comfy-looking antique rocking chair in Hansen’s crowded den, uploading the latest video message from Hansen to Facebook. Dodson said it would be the third video of the day – but not the last. 

“We are sharing the stories of what’s happening here,” Dodson said between Tweets and texts. “I want everyone to know what’s going on behind the scenes after they see him out on the street and knocking on doors.”

Roy Westfall heads to the precincts (Image by: Melissa Corker) At 6 p.m., campaign volunteer Roy Westfall, 36, hurried out the door on his way to polling places to do some poll checking. He took with him lists of known Hansen supporters to compare against public lists at the polls that indicate which voters have already stopped by their polling places.

The data compiled by Westfall and other volunteers was funneled to Hansen’s lead campaign coordinator and longtime ally, Jameson Parker. The fit 23-year-old (who could articulate campaign data like a Jeopardy champion) stood in front of a 4-foot-by-6-foot wall chart with his iPhone in hand to receive minute-by-minute updates from the poll checkers.

“I’m looking for what precincts we need to spend a little more attention on,” Parker, 27, said as yet another text update buzzed his iPhone. “Where there is a low turnout, we focus our volunteers even more.”

Jameson Parker at the data board (Image by: Melissa Corker) The hallmark of Hansen’s campaign was his reliance on innovative technology and social media to reach out to voters.

That technology included an Internet platform created this year (and beta-tested by the Hansen campaign) called rally.org, which Hansen said was designed to use social media for fundraising and allowed him to connect directly with donors.

There was more to Hansen’s strategy than just a digital approach, though.

He also applied boots-on-the-ground tactics, such as voter list checking at polling places and sign waving at busy Midtown and downtown intersections to keep the attention of likely voters.

By the time the polls closed at 8 p.m., Hansen and his team had put in more than 12 hours of nonstop election day activity.

Election party at Headhunters (Image by: Melissa Corker) He was joined for the election party at Headhunters video bar on K Street by more than 150 well-wishers and supporters, including Alkali Flat Neighborhood Association President Luis Sumpter, City Councilman Jay Schenirer, West Sacramento Mayor Christopher Cabaldon and a large contingent of LGBT community leaders.

Upbeat tempo music played over the sound system as poll results were broadcast on eight large flatscreen TVs above the bar. The crowd reacted with increased chatter as ballot returns put Hansen in second place behind Yee – and then applause broke out when Hansen pulled ahead and held a scant 1 percent lead.

As the clock struck 11 p.m., nearly 86 percent of precincts had reported, and Hansen was the frontrunner with 136 votes separating him and Yee. It was clear Hansen made the cut and would compete with Yee in the runoff election in November.

The only thing left to do was Tweet.


Final vote count from the District 4 race:
                                Votes    Percent
Steve Hansen          2,317    28.59
Joseph Yee              2,231    27.53
Phyllis A. Newton    1,798     22.19
Terry Schanz           1,213     14.97
Michael Rehm            207       2.55
Neil Davidson             161       1.99
David A. Turturici        159       1.96

Melissa Corker is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Facebook and on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

Editor's note: This article orginally stated that Steve Hansen is from Midtown. He is in fact from Alkali Flat. We regret the error.  (Thanks to Sacramento Press user "Zen" for pointing it out.)

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

June 6, 2012 | 8:12 AM
Steve really did pour his heart and soul into this race, and it's great to see that hard work pay off! Now, on to November!
7 2
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
June 6, 2012 | 8:25 AM
Congrats to Steve and everyone who worked on his campaign. Now that the Land Park vote is not split it will be even harder to overcome the political weight and family connections and developer and labor money that will be going into Yee's campaign, but it can be done. Unfortunately, I think the hardest work for Steve's campaign is still ahead.
8 2
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 9:39 AM
Social media savvy my bung. Steverino sent me about a phone book's worth of junk mail in less than a week. Stupefyingly incredible.
2 4
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 10:47 AM
Since I got a ton more junk mail from Yee and Newton than I did from Hansen I'm thinking maybe you just don't do enough to be on many mailing lists.
4 1
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
June 6, 2012 | 11:23 AM
What is a bung? Just because you got a few flyers in the snail mail (a phone book worth is a tad bit of an exaggeration) doesn't mean his campaign didn't use social media rather it probably means you don't use social media and therefore have no clue what was done.
1 1
REPLY
CCA
Author thumbnail
June 6, 2012 | 12:29 PM
jeffjeff has a point. i use social media and didn't hear one bit about steve hansen from it. however, social media is a great tool for reaching out to younger voters. i became aware of steve from the mailers and yard signs i saw all over midtown--and boy where they everywhere. the mailers i received from the hansen campaign were daily, several in fact in one day, and outnumbered the yee campaign's easily by 3 to 1. One thing to note, these mailers are really targeted to folks and living in midtown it's not unreasonable for me to receive more from the hansen folks than from yee's, althought that will now change.

now my question is do i vote for the corporate lobbyist or the architect?
3 4
REPLY
edited on  June 7, 2012 | 7:48 AM
It's funny because my experience was just the opposite. I received way more mailers from Yee and Newton than Hansen. So maybe it's just random. Since you have one posting on SacPress I wonder just how social media savvy you really are. OK so you have a FB account. So does my 70-yr old dad. But I suspect you were never a supporter of Hansen from your question 'do i vote for the corporate lobbyist or the architect?' Since it sounds like your candidate didn't win and now you are offering us your sour grapes in return I suggest you educate yourself on the issues and make an informed decision. That is something your candidate should have done and we did which is why she (or he) lost.
1 4
REPLY
CCA
Author thumbnail
June 7, 2012 | 3:52 PM
dear mark,
you're projecting quite a bit about my feelings that it boggles me as to why? how does asking the question make for sour grapes, exactly? don't get upset because i'm not jumping up and down for a candidate....i rarely do, they're politicians after all.
3 1
REPLY
June 9, 2012 | 7:48 AM
I'm not upset at all. Nor am I projecting CCA. Although I am assuming things which always gets me into trouble. I don't have a problem admitting the truth about myself. You see this as a race between politicians and I see this race in a broader context - of creating a unified central city. For me it's less about a particular candidate and more about the neighborhoods -which for decades were represented by people who didn't live in their environment. While we all share some common ground- there are issues and ways of thinking that are unique to the central neighborhoods.
1 1
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 10:01 AM
Congratulations Steve! A well-deserved win. As JWS said November is going to probably be a tougher campaign. But I believe we can prevail. The problem the central neighborhoods have had up until this election is that we all were separated and attached to larger and better-connected suburbs so that a candidate from Midtown, Southside, Alkali Flats or Downtown hardly had a chance in his or her district. This means we do not have a long history of 'direct political power' and have had to rely on grassroots neighborhood organizing. This can be an advantage if we can come together. I'm not saying that the needs and interests of Land Park residents should be ignored. On the contrary. Rather I'm saying that the needs of the central neighborhoods (especially outside of the more politically active Midtown) have been ignored for too long and that needs to change. And that change begins with voting in someone who lives in the central city.
3 1
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 12:22 PM
Can this article be anymore pro-Hansen? You only discuss what Steve wants you to discuss. You miss the big picture - Steve raised the most money and sent out he most mailers. (Newton had a lot, but most were from PACs)
4 4
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 1:46 PM
From what I can see he raised the second most - but I added that to the article. This piece is a ground-level look at his campaign on election night, which I think was warranted because he was running his campaign in a different manner than the other candidates. I'd like to follow-up on the mailer question. I've heard a few people complain about the amount of mailers they got in the days before the election.
6 0
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 1:49 PM
The article is a journalistic piece illustrating how the top vote-getter rallied his base. Should she have written an article counting the reasons why Newton lost?
4 1
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 2:53 PM
@dss89 - That article would be good to have, but our politics reporter is out at the moment . What do you think we should work on when she gets back tomorrow? The Newton piece is a good idea, but I'm afraid it might be too after the fact, though I could be wrong. Any recommendations are welcome.
1 0
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 4:43 PM
Jared, I think this would have been a stronger article if it took a more comparative approach, discussing technological tools other campaigns used and perhaps how they used them differently (even if not as effectively), as well as putting in the context of more traditional tactics (e.g., mail) -- and the campaign resources (yes, I mean money) associated with all of them. Just an opinion.
2 3
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 5:41 PM
Thanks Alan, I agree. Ideally, that information would have been woven into the article, so that it still had that "ground level" dispatch feel, but with more data and analysis behind it. We would of had to have thought of the idea sooner though, so the writer had more time with the piece. Now that there are fewer candidates, it will be easier for us to do more in-depth reporting on each one. You'll start to see a difference as the next election draws closer and our coverage picks up.
1 0
REPLY
Zen
Author thumbnail
June 6, 2012 | 12:59 PM
Since when is Steve Hansen from Midtown? Doesn't he live in Alkali Flat or did he move?
3 2
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 2:55 PM
Fixed. That was my mistake - not the writer's. I will add a note at the bottom noting the correction.
1 0
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 5:05 PM
Haha - Zen is the resident geographic monitor of SacPress. Good i. To me as long as our next council representative is from any of central city neighborhoods and not the suburbs I'll be happy. We need at least one member on the council from the original City of Sacramento.
3 1
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 7:59 AM
That's all grid to me.
3 1
REPLY
June 12, 2012 | 9:37 AM
OK, NOW we're just getting overly picky, aren't we?
0 1
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 5:37 PM
love the article. and love the comments. keep them coming. all of them!
2 0
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 9:19 PM
I think the real 'unreported' story of the District 4 race is how Steve Hansen's campaign, with an army of volunteers, overcame hundreds of thousands of dollars spent by PAC's supporting the other candidates. When all the expenditures are finally counted it will show that while Phyllis Newton spent $180,000, one of the several PAC's that supported her candidacy spent well over $100,000!!
5 2
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 9:27 PM
That's about $100 a vote!
2 0
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 8:08 AM
You're kidding right? How much money did Steve raise? And how much of it was from outside Sacramento?
3 2
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 12:37 PM
You can look all of that up on the City of Sacramento's website, under the City Clerk's department. I checked it out, saw a few outside-of-Sacramento contributions but mostly it was a lot of my friends and neighbors.
1 4
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 7:26 PM
Your friends and neighbors include the Personal Insurance Federation, AT&T, the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, Big Pharma, More pharma,the American Chemistry Council (aka oil, supports underground gas storage), more pharma, Townsend Public Affairs (the mayors guys), Republican political consultant, 3 police PACs, and Hollywood executives?
3 0
REPLY
June 9, 2012 | 7:57 AM
Jon who would you like to see as the next representative of D4?
0 0
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 9:35 AM
If you go to the City of Sacramento's website, you will see that Hansen did raise a lot of money from outside of Sacramento. If you add up the Land Park vote, it will be very difficult for Hansen to win in Nov.
2 3
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 12:37 PM
I suppose if you define Midtown/Downtown as "outside of Sacramento" you could make that case...it seems like some folks do.
3 2
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 10:19 AM
Candidate Hansen's volunteer staffer & home descriptions (plus pics!) added nothing to this piece, Melissa.
1 0
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 10:21 AM
And no Oreo glamour-shot!?!
1 1
REPLY
edited on  June 7, 2012 | 11:08 AM
I expect that whether Hansen wins in November or not depends on two things: 1) Whether the Obama campaign is able to energize its base in sufficient numbers and 2) How much distance he can put between himself and Johnson.

The reason being that Hansen will need the progressive vote and he will need to reassure people that he's not not Johnson's "back-up candidate" in order to win. After all, if you look at the Sac Bee map of where Johnson didn't do too well, you will notice that Hansen's district is quite yellow.
3 1
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 2:26 PM
Don't just look at the candidate look and see you is backing the candidate. One of the PAC's that backed Phyllis Newton was funded entirely by developer interests. If you check the campaign contribution lists you'll see those same names on Mayor Johnson's donor lists (Friedman & Heller). Point being, Steve Hansen is not the candidate of the supported by Mayor Johnson's backers, who also funded the Strong Mayor Initiative.
3 3
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 4:53 PM
That's odd, because Hansen benefactor Schenirer is telling anyone who will listen that Steve will be the Mayor's fifth vote on the council
3 1
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 5:06 PM
@Tom: If that's the case, how the teachers vote may decide this. There are a lot of public school teachers in that area and KJ is pro-charter as is his wife, Michelle. And while I realize that the City doesn't have direct control over the charters, it does have zoning authority. And it's hard to establish a school without a building.
0 0
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 7:26 PM
Good to see the candidate put forward by the fire union came in a distant third... I wonder if they (noting what happened in San Jose and San Diego) realized they milked 9/11 far longer than was ever honorable and maybe the electorate is beginning to understand just how far the fire and police unions are pushing Sacramento toward bankruptcy... But of course they don't notice the unkempt parks and lack of other city services because with their overtime pay they can afford to iive in upscale communities in El Dorado and Placer counties...
3 1
REPLY
June 8, 2012 | 11:36 AM
Great comment. But really all three candidates failed to propose any transformative changes to really address the budget challenges. Pension restructuring, outsourcing, re-alignment of city fire and paramedic services etc.

It appears the new candidated are just as willing to cater to the same old special interests while consistently ignoring the elephant in the room as was Rob Fong.

Wake me up when there is interest in real change like we saw this week in San Jose and San Diego.
2 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background