STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Where do City Council District 4 candidates stand on election day?

by Melissa Corker, published on June 5, 2012 at 12:36 AM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 8
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 8
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

On election day in Sacramento, candidates in the running for City Council seats are staying focused on the polls and counting votes. After months of campaigning, interviews, candidate forums and meet-and-greets, where do the candidates for District 4 stand now as voters start lining up to the polls?

David Turturici – The estate planning attorney from South Land Park said early in the race that he was running because he opposed – vehemently – Mayor Kevin Johnson’s arena plan. When the arena deal flatlined, Turturici’s campaign lost its basis, and Turturici lost steam. He didn’t lose his humor about it, however. When asked if he was going to suspend his campaign in May after blowing off a candidate forum, Turturici responded with tongue firmly in cheek.

“No, no,” he said. “I’m going to win. You'll see. I predict I will get 52 percent on June 5. There won’t even be a runoff.”

Michael Rehm – Local attorney Rehm’s low-key campaign included a live Internet show called “The Candidate at Eight,” where he sat in front of his webcam every weeknight at 8 p.m. to answer questions from District 4 residents. The first few shows gave him a chance to talk about raising revenue in the city by allowing naming rights on local buildings and pursuing the health industry to diversify the local economy.

Although a novel concept, the Internet show didn’t really take off – and neither did Rehm’s campaign. As the race wore on, Rehm said his shoestring budget and full-time criminal defense practice prevented him from “going all-out” to compete for the District 4 seat, and he doesn’t expect to be a top vote-getter in the primary.

Neil Davidson – Computer programmer Davidson said he joined the District 4 race after hearing Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum speak about the future of America. It “scared” him into “stepping up to the plate” to get involved in government, he said in January. It may not have been enough to fuel his fire to the finish line, however: Davidson’s quiet campaign peaked after four campaign forums and a few media interviews.

Davidson said he’s OK with that because, for him, the experience has been worth it.

“The best part has been that the things I wanted to talk about – medium-sized entertainment venues and Safe Ground – actually made it into print,” he said. “None of the other candidates really talked about those things, and now they are. I think that’s awesome.”

Terry Schanz – Self-described “hometown boy” Schanz has been hitting some high notes with his campaign for City Council, including endorsements from Sacramento Central Labor Council, Sacramento City Teachers Association and Sacramento County Young Democrats, and a smattering of bright orange yard signs throughout District 4. What Schanz doesn’t seem to have, however, is momentum to match his competitors who have a combination of money, experience and strong media presence.

If lawn signs and Internet buzz are any indications, he has failed to generate the same level of grassroots enthusiasm as the other candidates.

That said, Schanz’s campaign has been a direct-to-the-voters effort with walking neighborhoods and knocking on doors, but will that be enough to prevail?

Phyllis Newton – Newton has set the bar in the District 4 race for collecting endorsements and raising money: She’s backed by influential organizations like the Sacramento Metro Chamber and Sacramento Firefighters Local 522, she got The Sacramento Bee’s endorsement, and her campaign spending reached nearly $120,000 – not including more than $50,000 in independent expenditures made by supporters.

And, of course, there’s that ginormous billboard at the corner of 20th and J streets.

The attorney-turned-nonprofit organization director from Land Park has outpaced her opponents in many ways, but she’s ruffled some feathers along the way, especially in Midtown and central city neighborhoods where her message met resistance when the conversation turned to Second Saturday Art Walk and parking issues.

Steve Hansen – Social media powerhouse Hansen knows his way around Facebook and the Twittersphere: In one recent email blast, he told contacts that his team is “using new media to create a virtual ‘war room’ ” on election night.

Within hours of announcing his candidacy, Midtown resident Hansen made himself available via nearly every digital network, building an Internet presence that he and his campaign team backed up with almost-daily neighborhood walks and meet-and-greets with potential voters.

That kind of connectivity has helped Hansen get his name out in a big way, – but will all that digital media savvy translate outside of the Midtown and central city neighborhoods where Hansen’s fellow young professionals and hip urbanites call home?

As the only Midtown candidate in a wide field, Hansen will need to capture at least some support from the historically powerful Land Park voting block.

Joe Yee – Yee is the veteran of the group: His resume includes 19 years on the city planning commission and a stint as an interim council member back in 2000.

His experience has proven valuable on the campaign trail. When the Sacramento Old City Association asked about long-term efforts to preserve parts of the central city, Yee addressed their underlying concern: keeping the historic character of older neighborhoods intact. When the Land Park Community Association asked where to put a bridge over the Sacramento River, Yee said that points north of Sutterville Road suited him fine, which is exactly what concerned members of the audience wanted to hear.

Yee may have political chops, but that may not be ienough in a race where he’ll have to make up for for his lack of a strong web presence among a field of technology-adept competitors.

District 4 is one of two open seats in the primary without an incumbent in the race and a wide field of candidates eyeing the seat. With so many strong candidates, It appears likely the primary election will result in a runoff of the top two vote-getters in November – but the big question is, which two will it be? We should find out Tuesday night.

Melissa Corker is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

June 5, 2012 | 8:26 AM
I predict that Hansen and Newton will be the top 2 and will face off again in November.
1 1
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 4:37 PM
I agree.
0 1
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 9:42 AM
All in all, Newton brings the best background, experience and broad base of support to serve District 4.
2 5
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
June 6, 2012 | 9:06 AM
Haha. I assume from your screen name that you live in the Pocket Area and are a Republican. If that's true how the heck would know what's good for D.4? If I had any doubts your endorsement would make certain I didn't vote for Newton. Luckily people in my district are a smart bunch and didn't fall for her 'neighborhood voice' bull.
1 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 10:44 AM
I'm not in District 4 but, just as an outsider political junkie, for me the most interesting run-off would be between Yee and Hansen.
2 2
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 12:46 PM
Joe Yee's ideas are dated as the pictures on his website. Vote "NO" on anyone endorsed by Sandy Sheedy.
2 4
REPLY
edited on  June 5, 2012 | 2:54 PM
I don't know; I listened to his interview on Sacramento Current and he seemed quite thoughtful. But I am just speaking as an outsider here--for me a Yee vs. Hansen runoff would be the most fun to watch, is all.

I should note that our difference of opinion may stem from the fact that you're a Republican and I am a Democrat,
1 1
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
edited on  June 6, 2012 | 9:07 AM
Evak wins the prediction prize! And on Yee I can agree with my Pocket Area GOPer friend.
1 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 12:07 PM
Did I miss something? I live on Freeport Blvd near Broadway. The District 4 candidates were not on my ballot. I checked several times. I also voted at the Sierra 2 Center in Curtis Park, which was very strange. What's going on?
0 1
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 12:26 PM
You're in District 5. Your council member is Jay Schenirer.
0 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 12:29 PM
HelloBubba, By your description, you are right on the border of D4 and D5.... If your actual address puts you in D5, you would not have had any City Council candidates on your ballot.
0 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 12:59 PM
That's strange because the last council member I saw on the ballot was Rob Fong when I voted at the polls off Muir Way. I've also voted at St Paul's Episcopal Church downtown, and California Middle School in Land Park.... all in District 4.
0 1
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 2:37 PM
Hey Bubba, the city went through a major redistricting exercise last year. (remember the city council decision regarding what district the UC Med Center should reside). Land Park shifted considerably northward. Your new district, number 5, includes much of the south area that used to encompass district 4. The same thing happened with Supervisory districts. Jimmie Yee was my council member and supervisor for decades. Not any more as I am in Serna's supervisory district. Hope that helps. You didn't move, the district lines did.
0 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 2:40 PM
Predicting Hansen-Newton runoff, and supporting Hansen. Newton's endorsements make me nervous, as her financial backers are the same groups that have made millions off suburban sprawl and overdeveloped office towers.

Steve Hansen, from Day One, has made himself available to all constituents, regardless of the thickness of their wallet, and I hope his grassroots tactics take him to the finish line.
3 1
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 2:56 PM
If that's the case, you're absolutely right to support Hansen. This is the exact reason I am supporting Rewers over Johnson.
3 1
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 3:19 PM
dss89 - have you looked at Hansen's list of contributors? Mostly all OUTSIDE of Sacramento, how is that local & grassroots?
3 4
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 3:32 PM
Excuse me--you're supporting KJ, a guy only 31% of his donors are even eligible to vote in the mayor's race. The rest (69% of contributors, including Rupert Murdoch) are not able to vote in Sacramento: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/06/03/4534102/mayor-kevin-johnson-raises-big.html#storylink=misearch

And you are saying that Hansen is out of touch?
3 3
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
June 6, 2012 | 9:13 AM
Hum. In most cases I would agree that outside money is not as good as inside money. But not in Sacramento. There is just too small of a group of moneyed people here and the relationships are a bit too tight to not have cronyism. That has been Sacramento's problem for decades.
1 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 4:06 PM
@PocketGOP, at which list are you looking? And by grassroots, I mean this:

---While visiting Land Park this afternoon, a voter saw Steve, pulled over and said, "Steve! We voted for you. Thank you for personally walking through our neighborhood and stopping by our home."
Good stuff...---

Who, in your highly esteemed opinon, would make the best candidate? It's easy to go negative, much more difficult to use logic and defend your own position.
4 2
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 4:18 PM
dss89, see my comment above. Newton is the best choice for D4. All the candidates walked precincts and your definition of "grassroots" could fit any of them.
1 4
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
edited on  June 6, 2012 | 9:18 AM
How would a Pocket (Area) GOPer know what's good for D4? Really come on. You only support her because her philosophical views align more closely with yours and has nothing to do with her good grasp of the issues concerning a large chunk of the district.
1 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 4:12 PM
I hope Stave Hansen wins. Newton will not be good for Midtown.
3 1
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 4:40 PM
Phyllis Newton is a savvy and capable woman. As a midtown resident I would welcome her if she becomes our Council member. Our district is lucky to have some many good candidates running in this election.
2 4
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 4:46 PM
You mean the same Steve Hansen that has raised almost all of his money from out of state Pharmaceuticals? The same Steve Hansen that has lied about not being pro-mayor or arena (I believe at the Land Park Community Association, he said it would be really nice to see cirque du soleil and ice capades that he really wasn't into sports. The same Steve Hansen that's only really lived in downtown 2 years and has a really fishy loans type deal with Steve Maviglio's - the mayor's mouth piece? Wow, you people really do deserve what you get in the end.
3 4
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 5:08 PM
all of this is unsubstantiated drivel.
2 1
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 5:12 PM
also, a quick Google search reveals that "Joseph Demarco" donated to the Yes on 8 campaign. Were I to libelously label you an anti-gay bigot who hates civil rights, would it accurately represent you as a person?

Or maybe it was just something I heard. Think before you write.
http://www.sfgate.com/webdb/prop8/
2 2
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 5:27 PM
i didn't give money to yes on 8, i myself am gay. if your so good at using google, check out his fppc papers. enjoy.
3 3
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
edited on  June 6, 2012 | 11:32 AM
Of course there's no way of knowing that you are NOT the guy dss89 googled and you are lying about that now. But that is beside the point. So let's take a look at the issues you raised. Considering that Steve works for one of the largest biotech companies its not hard to imagine why he would get support from people he knows within the pharmaceutical industry. But since a city councilman has very little chance of voting on matters that concern pharmaceutical companies I don't see how that should matter. I would personally rather have someone who is involved in a future growth industry than a boring 'local boy' who just happens to be well-connected. I want change not the same old thing. As for being for or against the arena deal. Since I changed my mind on that one as the details came out to me this shows an open mind rather than one that is already made up before all the fact are presented. And so what Steve has only lived "downtown" for only 2 years (to sub-urbanites and SacBee all of the grid is downtown)? That's 2 years longer than any of the other candidates. All the others live in the suburbs south of central city. I don't know anything about 'fishy loans' and you probably don't either but I do know that Yee and not Hansen is supported by big local developers and labor groups and most likely the mayor though I don't believe he officially supported any candidate. So you can twist any 'facts' to suit your bias or just make things up.
2 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 4:49 PM
@PocketGOPer, i understand that you admire her. I'm sure she is a great woman. But what, besides her ability to spend money on adverts and secure developers' financial backing qualifies her to represent these neighborhoods? How many big-ticket developers live in Midtown or Land Park? If you're worried about outside influence (you've conveniently left out any evidence of Hansen's outside backers), then you should be worried that developers from outside the district are spending to influence a race in which they have no personal stake. Professional, sure.

If you are voting solely on experience in Sacramento, then Joe Yee should be your guy. If you're voting on social issues, it's Schanz. If you're voting for accurate representation of the folks that ACTUALLY live, work, and play in the district, it's obviously Hansen.
4 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 5:24 PM
Here's my take...Netwton and Yee in a close Nov runnoff race. Bill Camp supported Terry Schantz to co-op the LGBT/midtown vote and blow Hansen out. After today, he'll shift his support alongside Building Trades and other labor for Joe Yee...then it becomes a classic business vs labor dog and cat fight to Nov.
1 2
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 5:34 PM
You do realize the joe yee was labors pick in the beginning - that's why he has some labor support and Bill Camp at central committee spoke against Terry and for Joe Yee?
0 0
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
June 6, 2012 | 3:32 AM
Not a very good prognosticator are ya? That's OK neither am I.
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background