STORYLINE Community

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

City of Sacramento has plans to address central city parking pains

by Baryo Dee, published on June 3, 2012 at 8:41 PM

Storyline: Community RSS Feed

1 of 3
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 3
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

During peak hours, nearly 46,000 parking spaces remain empty in the Central City even on Second Saturday Art Walks according to a 2012 Nelson\Nygaard study.

Despite these vacancies, it’s not unusual to see frustrated drivers circling around, block by block for curbside parking in Midtown or downtown during Second Saturday .

To address this situation, the city of Sacramento is working with the Midtown Business Association (MBA), and state and private property owners to help decongest Sacramento’s on-street parking.

Howard Chan, parking manager for the city of Sacramento, said the city is working on increasing the number of off-street parking spaces available to the Central City.

“Our efforts now are turning toward private parking lots where we will talk to property owners similar to our discussions with the state and  the Eastern Garage to make their spaces available on nights and weekends to increase the supply again,” he said.

The city partnered with the state to open the East End Garage on 17th and L streets, charging a flat rate of $2 on evenings and weekends in June 2007. The garage houses nearly 600 parking spaces, yet it consistently falls below capacity during heavily congested nights and weekends, according to Chan.

As a response to vacant lots such as the East End Garage, Chan and others are working to update parking zoning codes and increase the visibility of less-utilized spaces.

Here is a breakdown of the current and proposed parking projects under way. 

Residential Parking Pilot Program: The residential parking pilot program will extend resident-only parking hours from 6 p.m. to 12 a.m. on Second Saturdays for three consecutive months. Chan is meeting with neighborhood associations affected by the pilot program for input. Depending on when those meeting take place, the pilot could be under way in July or August.

Parking Zone Update:  The city has drafted a proposal to change mandatory parking requirements for businesses and residential properties. Highlights include eliminating the parking requirement for commercial spaces less than 6,400 square feet, a tiered parking space standard dependent on neighborhood type, and alternative options to the parking requirement such as bike parking or an in-lieu-of fee. The proposed timeline for the adoption of the report and ordinance is September.

City management of private parking: The city is speaking with businesses to turn privately owned parking spaces into city-managed parking on nights and weekends. The timetable for this project depends on the individual agreements with the city and property owners.

Midtown/downtown parking map and iPhone application: The Midtown Business Association is developing a comprehensive map of city-managed, city-owned and private parking lots. The .pdf-format map will be available late this summer. The organization will update its free iPhone parking application called “Explore Midtown” during the same time.

East End Garage Marketing: The Midtown Business Association is working with the city to increase visibility of the East End Garage through increased signage. There will be signs in a one-block perimeter away from the garage with arrows pointing to the entrance.

Chan said that he acknowledges the challenge of encouraging people to use off-street parking in areas that currently have free residential parking after 6 p.m. He said their goal will be to place long-time parkers and employees into off-street parking lots so that on-street parking can turn over faster.

Elizabeth Studebaker, executive director of the MBA, also recognizes the challenge to decongest the streets.

“The difficult thing is that both sides are right,” she said. “I know that parking is congested for residents, and I know that parking is congested in the commercial district, so really, we have a set of tools at our disposal that we just need to make sure we are using as best as possible.”

Chan said that the city welcomes feedback from the public regarding its plans and particularly regarding its pilot program, since it can be implemented very soon.

“We’re trying to really facilitate a good solution, and that’s the nature of our outreach over the next month or two,” he said.






 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

edited on  June 4, 2012 | 7:46 AM
Gee, How about a centralized stacked garage in Midtown? As Mark said in an earlier post, "And we can thank (or curse) former councilman Jimmie Yee's task force and the city council for putting the kibosh on a central Midtown public parking garage some years ago."
4 1
REPLY
June 4, 2012 | 10:27 AM
You almost have to change people's perceptions in order for this to work. There are plenty of parking lots downtown to park in - my favorite is the one on L and 16th, it's $2 in the evening. I use that to park whether I'm walking one block or 6. I think visitors to midtown/downtown want to park in front of where they are going and not walk.I don't know how to change that. Maybe opening up more private, state, and city lots in the evenings for cheap would encourage less street parking.
6 0
REPLY
June 4, 2012 | 12:45 PM
It's understandable--in much of the region, it is standard practice to drive from store to store, using each store's parking lot. In fact, stores with their own parking lots even discourage parking once and then walking around the neighborhood! So it must seem pretty illogical for people who visit downtown and discover that there aren't parking lots in front of each store, and that it's far more difficult to re-park at every store than to just park your car in a paid lot and walk around. That habit comes with familiarity.

Opening up private lots is a bigger challenge--there are plenty of private lots that are chained off at 5 PM, but the owners of those lots don't want the insurance liability of what might happen if people can use them after hours. Opening up state lots is another interesting idea but it is less useful--most of the state parking structures are downtown in places that are several blocks from the places people want to visit. And, of course, if parking on the street in residential neighborhoods is free, what incentive do evening visitors have to use those lots at all?
5 1
REPLY
edited on  June 5, 2012 | 11:01 AM
Thanks for your comment. We on the RHI/HZA committee meetings were told about the liability issue. So I contacted three parking lot owners who have paid parking during the day. All said that their liability is 24/7 365 days a year-- no surface parking lots are "walled in" like an enclosed building with four walls around it. Even those with closed gates, signs prohibiting parking after a certain hour or high fences are still subject to unauthorized cars parking in their spaces or individuals crossing their lots who could fall or other mishap occur for which their liability clause would kick in.

Your point about "parking on the street in residential neighborhoods is free, what incentive do evening visitors have to use those lots at all?" is especially key. On SS I've seen young women in high heels and cocktail dresses park as far north of J as 21s & E then walk down to J or K clubs/bars as late as 9:00 p.m.
3 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 12:29 PM
I suppose they perceive it as a difference between someone incidentally using their lot without their permission and actively utilizing their lot with permission, which may change the issue of liability.
0 0
REPLY
June 4, 2012 | 5:11 PM
Once we lived here for a year, we learned that even on really busy times like Second Saturday, you could always find parking if you were willing to walk all of two to four blocks to your destination. And quite often the parking we find is free. (Although over the years the free bit has become a 50/50 as the City takes more and more spots off the "free menu" so to speak.) But the point is, if you are willing to invest in tennis shoes, you should have no real issues finding parking even on the busiest of days.
3 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 8:34 AM
Amen.
1 0
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 10:25 AM
Besides the exception of second Saturdays (which I suspect will eventually go away because it's turned into a big bore), there are ongoing daily parking issues that need to be re-thought for other Saturdays.

One problem we have in midtown is the excessive and illogical use of parking meters. If I want to drive to 21st street and have breakfast at Lucky Cafe on a Saturday, then walk around and do some shopping, I have to pay a meter on a completely empty street to do so. It just grates on my nerves to have to feed a meter on a completely empty street to be able to stay in the area to shop. So guess what, I don't do it. Instead I will go to the Corner Stone at Headhunter's which does not have meters on it's street. Too bad for the Lucky Cafe. Sacramento needs to make parking free on Saturdays if it is serious about making midtown/downtown work. It's just stupid to discourage customers that way.

And what if I want to try out a new restaurant like The Porch. And it turns into a leisurely meal. I have to worry about the meter. Did I put enough time in it? Do I have to interrupt my dessert to add more time? Screw it, I'll just go someplace else instead.
3 1
REPLY
June 5, 2012 | 12:35 PM
You could always park at a private lot, or the East End Garage, pay a flat fee, then take your time wandering around. It might require walking more than one block, but you might find more places you want to spend time or money. There is a pay lot directly in back of The Porch, one directly across the street from Lucky Cafe, and Lucky Cafe is one block from Headhunters so it sounds like you're basing your unwillingness to go to Lucky Cafe on the one-block distance from parking spot to restaurant front door. Most of the Midtown private lots cost about $2-5, which isn't going to break the bank, and you don't have to worry about running back to feed the meter.

And if you're going to visit The Porch for dinner, you don't have to worry about street meters because you don't have to pay after 6 PM.
4 0
REPLY
June 4, 2012 | 5:48 PM
I agree Evak. "But the point is, if you are willing to invest in tennis shoes..."
Invest in longer life, rose-smelling, slow down, look around--walk.
2 0
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 10:36 AM
Let us not forget that money talks and therefore it influences policy. The City gets a ton of money from the meters and parking tickets and some of big private parking lot operators here have interesting and not-so-well-publicized connections. I believe that Howard Chan, the parking manager for the city of Sacramento, may not be the best qualified person to tackle the problem because I question his ability act objectively and worry that he may be inclined towards favoritism based on relationships and connections rather than what is good for the residents and small business in the central city.

I agree with those saying that people just need to get used to walking a few blocks. But I also agree with Steve31 that we need to seriously change the City's failed parking policy and do something about the City's 'high-tech' parking meter fiasco.
1 2
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 1:00 PM
Tell us more about these "interesting and not-so-well-publicized connections."
2 1
REPLY
edited on  June 7, 2012 | 8:20 AM
Do I dare open up that can of worms? I'll let some investigative reporter look into uncorroborated suggestions so I won't look think some crank or worse. I'm not saying Mr. Chan is a bad man. I am saying often times the people around us influence our decisions and some of those people have an interest in motivating us to do something for them. Often that 'something' is for financial gain. Without outside pressure or countering influences the person has a hard time seeing other people's points of view and making decisions that are right for the situation and for the consumer who is not going to gain financially.
1 1
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 12:39 PM
Please, please open up that can of worms. Enough with the cheesy innuendo and passive-aggressive allegations! FACTS OR GTFO.
0 1
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 5:55 PM
There are a lot of options the city could employ to manage parking to both reduce congestion and promote downtown businesses. But the options could be very limited if the city privatize the city own parking lots to fund an arena.
1 0
REPLY
June 6, 2012 | 9:45 PM
Fortunately, the arena plan is dead and buried. Tell us about some of these options, though!
0 0
REPLY
June 7, 2012 | 9:01 PM
Looks like I spoke too soon...the Mayor is assigning two of his best guys (who previously focused on Strong Mayor I, II and III) to the Arena "Plan B" boondoggle-to-be, and firing Chris Lehane!
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background