STORYLINE The City

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

As a leader you have to stand for something.  There are times when ambiguousness, inaction and a soft voice are unacceptable – times when you can’t keep your head down hoping to emerge with no blood stains, scrapes or cuts.

Our city is telling employees to start paying all of the employee portions of retirement or face deep staffing cuts.  According to one news report, “62 firefighters and 34 police officers face losing their jobs.”  Now, Mayor Johnson and council members need to tell us what they stand for.  Each council member should make some detailed comments on the current proposed cuts to the fire and police departments.  As of Sunday, May 20th, none of our elected had a position paper or press release posted on their websites on this issue.  This is a big deal!  Council members need to tell us why they are locked into what appears to be an all-or-nothing proposition on pensions.

As this saga unfolds, here are some things to think about:


• The city manager wants firefighters to make 9.8% contributions to their retirement plans.  When they were hired, our city told   firefighters it would pay the employee’s portion of retirements: the city changed its mind.  Being amiable, firefighters conceded to pay 6% toward their retirement.  That equates to 3.5 million annually to help close the 15 million budget gap.
• Firefighters also conceded to defer a 5% contractual raise.  That equates to 3 million dollars to close this year’s budget gap.
• In October 2012, the city will gain 6-8 million dollars, and additional annual payments of 2-3 million dollars as a result of AB 678 which requires Medi-cal to pay for fire transportation costs.  That is 6-8 million dollars for this budget year and 2-3 million dollars annually to close the budget gap.
• Additionally, firefighters have offered solid solutions to help close the budget gap and avoid painful layoffs.  Just like the city is currently adjusting other fees (see agenda item #6 - May 8, 2012), firefighters are suggesting an increase of $100 per medical transport to generate approximately 4.4 million dollars annually.  Moreover, firefighters believe deployment of three additional ambulances will generate an additional 3 million dollars in annual revenue.


I am a public employee who ran for Sacramento City Council in 2010 and familiar with these issues.  I often say politics is the art of the possible.  So, if Mayor Johnson works on this issue with the same zeal he had for the down town arena, this is what is possible – and fair.

Right now the firefighters stated concessions and Medi-cal payments to the fire department, which are just around the corner, will provide 12.5-14.5 million dollars to close this year’s budget gap.  That is more than enough for now!  With the items previously identified as annual contributions, the fire department will contribute approximately 10-11million dollars to close the structural budget gap.  In the words of Vice President Joe Biden: that is a big “$#%@ing” deal!


So here is where things get tricky and ugly.  Why are these fire concessions not a good deal?  Why is it still a take-no-prisoners war?  Why, unlike previous years, are there no public workshops in the neighborhoods on the budget this year so citizens can vet the process?  The council needs to speak up on these issues.  Each council member should give us the respect to hold at least one town-hall style meeting on this matter.

The city manager is on a self-serving mission to MAKE EMPLOYEES PAY.  I think council members were originally one hundred percent supportive of this take-no-prisoners mission.  Since firefighters have placed solid concessions and solutions on the table, the city’s all-or-nothing pension mission will be seen as excessive if the public learns what is happening.  I believe this has come down to a strategy by city officials of running out the clock – keeping their heads down and getting unions to fold before citizens can see the city’s plan takes away more than is necessary.

Fairness demands the city only ask unions to give up what is necessary to close the budget gap related to employees –anything more will be used by the city on other programs and that is not fair.  For example, if fire fully concedes to the city now, after the budget is finalized the city will later gain money within the fire department under AB 678 (6-8 million dollars this year and 2-3 million dollars annually).  If the city knows this money is coming, it is unfair and unnecessary to fully follow through with the proposed cuts.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

May 22, 2012 | 2:22 PM
Henry:

None of them, not one deserves re-election on the city council or the mayor's office. If they would only fight for police, fire, infrastructure, and overall city well being the way they fought for that damned arena...
2 3
REPLY
May 22, 2012 | 8:48 PM
I think one of the newer ones understands that this is the citizens' council and the people should come first.
0 0
REPLY
May 22, 2012 | 2:50 PM
Oh goody it's Political season on Sac Press. I vote to stop contributing my tax payer money to pay for anybody's retirement. Firefighter or not.
2 2
REPLY
May 22, 2012 | 3:01 PM
Should that include your social security as well?
1 0
REPLY
May 22, 2012 | 3:37 PM
Young people paying for old people's retirement has always struck me as a very strange thing to do.
2 0
REPLY
May 22, 2012 | 8:44 PM
Sir, I just want a public discussion on whatever we do. Let put it to a commission or a vote and give workers a few years to transition.
0 0
REPLY
May 23, 2012 | 12:37 PM
APATHY and IGNORANCE is a terrible thing to waste! When it comes to public and police officer safety in the City of Sacramento, the is an over-abundance of both. If one is to believe the ELECTED and the APPOINTED don't see themselves as the ANOINTED UNTOUCHABLES, it's time to break out Cervantes' Man of La Mancha - Don Quixote!

I admire your passion Henry. I've lost mine. I'm reminded of Roosevelt turning to Churchill before the Congress realized Hitler was a threat to the entire world: “It is a terrible thing to look over your shoulder when you are trying to lead – and find no one there.”

What I have learned in my 18 years of a failed campaign for public and officer safety it this: No one person has all the knowledge and capabilities to be a leader without a team behind them. The Occupy people, while misguided in not knowing its roots, did practice a form of Collaborative Leadership: the ability of the whole to work together transcending the sum of the parts.

Like the Occupy Movement, there are times Margaret Mead's expression, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world." falls short when it comes to Sacramento "Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” "Live with tyranny... expect the worst at the hands of tyrants." David Jenest, circa May 23, 2012
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background