STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Budget cuts whittle park maintenance to one-man crews

by Melissa Corker, published on May 15, 2012 at 10:58 PM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

The next time you go to a city park, bring your pruning shears and garden gloves: Park maintenance in the city is about to be dealt a $119,000 budget blow – leaving the department with one-man maintenance crews and increasing the burden on volunteers to pick up the slack.

“I’m not happy to say this, but we have inadequate resources and inadequate staffing,” Director Jim Combs told the City Council Tuesday.

Even with a department budget reduced by more than 60 percent and staffing reduced by 50 percent over the past five years, Combs said everyone in the department has done their best to keep city services afloat.

But it’s a losing battle, Combs said.

The city’s park services maintains more than 210 parks totaling more than 2,000 acres and, according to Combs, park maintenance has gone from a staff of 150 five years ago to a current staff of 70 including janitors, community center staff and park maintenance crews.

The proposed city budget calls for the elimination of two more full-time positions – staff members Combs said the department just can’t spare.

Jonathan Rewers, chair of the city Parks Commission, told council members Tuesday that the commission voted 8-2 last week to recommend the council reject the proposed Parks Department budget.

Rewers said the commission instead proposes the council look for reductions in other areas of the budget, and encourages employee unions to reconsider concessions that would make the proposed budget reductions to the parks department unnecessary.

Rewers also said the commission would like to see a November ballot initiative asking voters to approve a tax to raise revenue specifically for park maintenance.

The City Council did not take any action on the parks department budget at Tuesday’s meeting, but members will discuss the Parks Commission recommendations May 22.

Melissa Corker is a staff reporter for the Sacramento Press. Follow her on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

JWS
Author thumbnail
May 16, 2012 | 8:59 AM
City parks belong to us, the people of Sacramento, and not to some independent and impersonal entity we call 'the city'. Therefore, we have a responsibility to take care of our parks. In the past we were financially able to hire enough people to do the work for us but times are tough so we are going to have start picking up the slack. This is nothing new. Even in wealthy cities like New York there was a time when park maintenance was so low that New Yorkers were forced to step up and step in to ensure that their great parks would survive into the future. Today we face comparably far fewer problems here in Sacramento. The question is are Sacramentans as good of citizens?
3 0
REPLY
May 16, 2012 | 12:20 PM
I know that Sacramentans are good citizens; I created and manage the Tahoe Park Neighborhood Association's Park Beautification Program, and we have had six park clean-up events in the last two years, with two more set for 2012. At each event, dozens of people come out to help make sure Tahoe Park remains and safe and clean place for families to come together.

If someone starts such a group, and advertises it properly, people will and do show up to make a difference.
5 0
REPLY
May 16, 2012 | 12:54 PM
That's great Issac but you are aware aren't you that Sacramentans have a reputation of being stingy? I'm not saying that the fine people who contribute on Sac Press are though. Most the people here are informed or at least interested in what's going beyond their front door.
0 0
REPLY
May 16, 2012 | 10:04 AM
The obvious question here is what is the cost if all park maintenance staff are laid off, and the services outsourced to a non-union private contractor?

it is truly bizarre that city council is so beholden to the public employee unions that they dont even bother to explore practical solutions before immediately agreeing to service reductions.
2 2
REPLY
May 16, 2012 | 12:49 PM
Or you can be a complainer and assume (wrongly) that your civic responsibility ends at begrudgingly paying your taxes and obeying the law, well other than the traffic ones anyway.
0 2
REPLY
May 16, 2012 | 4:03 PM
Mark, what in the world are you talking about?
1 1
REPLY
May 16, 2012 | 2:19 PM
Outsourcing park maintenace has to be on the table. To its credit, the city council approved outsourcing city golf course maintenance last fall for a projected annual $500,000 savings. Outsourcing basic park maintenance will save many times that amount. In William Land Park we have seen the park maintenance crew reduced from 19 full-time park workers in 2005 to just three workers today, all of whom are over 60 and nearing retirement. Despite monthly park clean-ups by 50 to 90 volunteers of the Land Park Volunteer Corps, we can barely hold back the tide of mounting neglect. Outsourcing has to be considered and very soon.

Raising taxes to fund park care before trying outsourcing maintenance is simply nuts. Why should city taxpayors pay higher taxes for services that could be provided less expensively by private contractors who will do the work while creating twice the number of current jobs, particularly for unemployed young people. Does McCarty seriously believe that 2/3rds of recession-slammed Sacramento voters will vote for such a tax hike?
3 0
REPLY
May 16, 2012 | 5:06 PM
Hi Craig, we have tried to outsource Park Maintenance in the park. The problem is when you use contractors, you don't get the response time you need to community concerns. With crews on dispatch to 311 and our supervisors, we can deal with issues as they come up in our park system - which they do everyday. Speaking for the maintenance of our Urban Forest, we did move more toward contracted maintenance, and were able to go from a 20 year pruning cycle to a more standard 7, but it was a hybrid syste, in which our staff supervised the contractors, as they are the experts - we do need people that know and care about our parks. It might just come to the voters, and they will decide....if we can't afford it, we will have to consider major changes.
0 0
REPLY
JAT
Author thumbnail
May 22, 2012 | 9:40 AM
Why weren't the contracts written to include emergency dispatch requirements? I would think you'd have more flexibility with private contractors, since you call all the shots, whereas with unions you call very few.
In any case, I know you have a tough job. Good luck.
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background