STORYLINE Food

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

SactoMofoed! New food truck alliance seeks collaboration with restaurants, city

by Jared Goyette, published on May 15, 2012 at 12:39 AM

Storyline: Food RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

A new food truck alliance launched in Sacramento last week, one that aims to fundamentally shift the relationship the trucks have with both restaurant owners and the city government.

The group, Norcal Food Trucks (@EatNorcalTrucks), was started as both an alternative and a companion to the organization that has represented the food trucks so far – SactoMofo.

While SactoMofo is run by food truck advocates, Norcal Food Trucks will be run by the truck owners, according to Chris Jarosz, the owner of the Wicked' Wich truck and one of the organizers behind Norcal.

“We want to start representing ourselves,” Jarosz said. “We want to start showing that we have respect for the community…. We want to show the restaurant community that ‘Hey, we want to sit across from the table from you and talk about what works best for everyone. We don’t want to just tell you that we have the right to do whatever we want.’ ”

The organization's’ Facebook page has only been live for a few days, but it already has several of Sacramento’s gourmet food trucks on board, including EL Matador, Mama Kim’son the Go, Heavenly Dog, Local Kine Shave Ice and Fuszion Eatz. Norcal has also opted to let in “trailers,” or trucks that pull their kitchen/cooking area behind them, such as The Pizza Company and Simply Southern.

Paul Somerhausen, one of the founders of SactoMofo, said he didn’t see Norcal as a compeitor and thought the group’s founding was a positive development for the local food truck scene.

“I don’t see it as an issue at all in the sense that the number of players in the local food truck scene has expanded significantly,” Somerhausen said, “and there is going to be people with various opinions and ultimately we all have the same goal, which is to change the ordinances and make Sacramento and more friendly community for mobile food vendors.”

Catherine Enfield, a former member of SactoMofo who runs the food blog Munchie Musings and the food truck site sacfoodtrucks.net, said she saw Norcal as the culmination of a process that began more than a year ago, when the food trucks first told City Council they intended to form an alliance. An organization never came together – until now.

“They want to represent themselves as truck owners, Enfield said. “The trucks are their businesses and their livelihoods, and they feel like trucks should be able to speak for themselves.”

Another factor that likely played a role: money.

While SactoMofo was started as a nonprofit organization, the group more recently became a for-profit company and began to charge trucks referral fees for events it organizes.

Norcal, on the other hand, has no plans to charge trucks referral fees, according to Jarosz.

“(SactoMofo) are starting to become a food truck event planner,” Enfield said, “but they are also trying to be advocates as well, but Norcal wants to be representatives of themselves.”

Part of Norcal’s plan to appease the city and restaurant owners is to pool the group’s funds to lease vacant, privately owned lots downtown, which will be used by several of the trucks at once on a rotating, weekly basis.

“The idea is to create more energy, to occupy some of these empty spaces and actually get people to come downtown because there is a lot more going on,” Jarosz said.

While Norcal will serve as an alternative to SactoMofo in some regards, Jarosz emphasized that he doesn't think the two groups will be rivals. 

Enfield said she thinks that the food trucks will still work closely with SactoMofo, as the advocacy group has established itself as a powerful local brand.

“SactoMofo has become such a big thing, and the name has become so trendy, when people think of food trucks, they’re thinking ‘Oh, well, I should talk to SactoMofo,’ ” Enfield said.

Jared Goyette is the editor of the Sacramento Press. Follow him on Twitter - @JaredGoyette

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

May 15, 2012 | 5:52 AM
This is a growing trend in the mobile food industry. Food truck owners across the country are forming organizations which imho is a necessity. The National Restaurant Association isn't supporting food truck owners, (even though they should) they need a single voice to defend themselves and to represent their interests.

Food truck event organizers provide a great service, but now that people have seen that it's a way to make money, there are many more out there looking to make money off the backs of the truck owners.
6 0
REPLY
edited on  May 15, 2012 | 10:03 PM
Hat's off to Chris Jaroz and NorCal Food Trucks! It's about time to separate the true needs of mobile food trucks from the SactMoFo group. It's about time someone stood up to SactoMoFo and said "no thanks", we don't need to be pimped out anymore, we'll take care of our own best interests. SactoMoFo passed from being an advocate to a promoter some time ago. Charging far more than nescessary to some and nothing at all to others for a spot at past events. They also told truck owners where to be without any concern for previous plans trucks had made. Up until now no one has taken the stand to do things their own way, too afraid they would be ostracized from the local mobil food scene, every food truck has followed SactoMoFo blindly paying whatever wildly crazy fees for events that SactoMoFo coordinated but wasn't even charged a penny for, and I only heard of 4 of 15 donated prizes awarded in the raffle the entire time Sactomofo3 ran. I believe they have an obligation to publish a list of winners that shows which prizes were awarded to whom. That should be no problem because they needed to keep that info for tax purposes. They made (in a rough average of SactoMofo3) $5k in cash alone!. Not bad for a day's work!
3 6
REPLY
March 26, 2013 | 11:29 AM
Actually, if gifts are "passed through" the sponsoring organization when given to the winner and there is no conversion, change, or addition, it's not a legal requirement for the sponsoring organization to keep a record of distribution. You should be careful giving legal advice if you are not an attorney...
0 0
REPLY
May 15, 2012 | 8:17 AM
in which jurisdiction do food trucks collect and pay sales tax? It seems that it should vary depending on the city in which they are selling their products. I don't know if Sacramento sent any tax collectors to the various MoFo festivals, but if not it seems that they should. Perhaps this is another reason that traditional restaurant owners are not on board with the food truck as it does seem to be unfair competition if in addition to the avoidance of property rents and taxes the food truck owners also fail to collect and submit their share of local sales taxes.
4 5
REPLY
May 15, 2012 | 8:20 AM
We've recommended that food truck operators form their own alliance in Sacramento for quite some time, and couldn't be happier to see it come to fruition. We've spent a great deal of time with several of these owner/operators since last August, and have written extensively about the street food market in Sacramento in our blog, stitchesndishes.com. We cover the street food scene around the entire state - we've attended hundreds of street food events, and developed relationships with organizers from San Diego to San Francisco. Of all the events in all of the cities in the entire state, we've directly received complaints from food truck operators about one - SactoMoFo.

The street food culture in Sacramento is only in its very early stages of development. There should be less focus on changing ordinances and more focus on developing that culture, in my opinion. I adamantly disagree with Paul Somerhausen's statement that the primary goal should be to "change ordinances and make Sacramento more friendly to food vendors." An organizer's goal should be to provide the best possible service - quality entertainment and quality food at a pleasant and safe venue. And, that's precisely what the food truck operators want - they're concerned about satisfied customers, not the opinions City Council may have about their events. We can't "make" a city want something, but we can certainly change its perception. We can grow a market where no market exists, with positive reinforcement, quality service and quality events - NOT bullying tactics and threatening posturing at City Council meetings.

Catherine Enfield is correct - food truck operators would like to speak for themselves. This is probably the primary complaint we've received from Sacramento. The owner/operators have expressed concern that an outside group with no experience in mobile foods has positioned itself to represent them to City Council and the public at large. Several have stated that they've felt bullied or cornered, and feared retaliation if they did not endorse the group. SactoMoFo attends meetings with City Council, speaking on behalf of the food truck operators, without the food truck operators' knowledge or consensus. I don't believe, though that, as Catherine Enfield states, "SactoMoFo has become such a big thing." It's "one" thing - and it's been the "only" thing - but it's not the authority on street food in Sacramento by any stretch of the imagination. It is, in fact a self-identified "advocacy" (read "activist") political influence organization. People want to put the politics aside and enjoy a great meal - that's all. That's really the bottom line. So, kudos to Chris Jarosz and the gang for establishing a great alliance.

The monthly "Good Street Food + Design" event begins next month in Sacramento (no fees), and will bring an entirely different perspective to street food events in the region. Even neighboring Nevada County is following in suit with its own mega-scale street food festival this June.

As Mobile Cuisine stated, event organizers are sprouting up across the country exponentially. Events provide a solution to food truck owners in areas like Sacramento, where it is difficult or impossible to vend at street locations. But, in so many cases, the event organizers lack experience and their events ultimately lack attendees - bottom line, they rarely look out for the best interest of the food truck operators.
3 3
REPLY
May 15, 2012 | 8:30 AM
“SactoMofo has become such a big thing, and the name has become so trendy, when people think of food trucks, they’re thinking ‘Oh, well, I should talk to SactoMofo,’ ” Enfield said.

Of course it was taken a little out of context. What I was saying around that quote was that SactoMoFo, to many residents, has become synonymous with Sac's mobile food movement when in reality they are only a piece of it. If people want to book trucks, they can do so directly with them or through contacts, like myself, who aren't adding fees.

As a founder who has since left SactoMoFo, I think they do an important part. One quote they left out is that SactoMoFo is an advocate for the consumers. They don't necessarily speak for the trucks. I think it is important that we consumers have someone representing what we want, which is more mobile food with less restrictions. After all, the parties involved are the local governments, the truck owners, and the consumer. That the restaurants continue to feel they should have a say in it is off base.
5 1
REPLY
May 15, 2012 | 9:29 AM
Catherine, I think the meaning of the quote we used is clear within the context of the article. Do you see a need for any correction? If so, just let me know. Of course, we don't use all the quotes (or else it would be nothing but quotes) and are many more sides of the story still left to tell. It's good that you brought out that point here though - the comments are, at the end of the day, part of the article and how it will be read.
3 0
REPLY
May 15, 2012 | 3:26 PM
Ms. Paula Guido-Lee: your comment regarding raffle prizes is extremely troubling. Because we took such great care to notify every winner, and delivered most of the prizes directly by hand on our own time after the event, we're very concerned about your allegation. If you have any proof whatsoever that SactoMoFo did not practice due diligence in handing out all the raffle prizes, please come forward with it. We are a small group of Sacramento residents that care about small local businesses, bringing good food to our region, and organizing great community events, and would never behave the way you characterize in your comment above. We pride ourselves in running a reputable and honest organization, and go to great lengths to make sure of just that. If you would like to talk with us directly, please contact us at info@sactomofo.com. Our doors are always open.
6 2
REPLY
May 15, 2012 | 10:14 PM
So, in practicing your "due diligence" in trying to award the prizes, what happens to those that are unawarded/unclaimed. Are they returned in good faith to the business that donated them? Like I said above I'd like to see a list of winners, what they won and if possible when they claimed their prize. Did anyone see the list of winners?
1 3
REPLY
May 16, 2012 | 11:59 AM
Paula, in the case of two award winners who did not respond to our phone messages and one who did not include a working phone number, we simply drew additional names for the prizes. Is there a particular prize you were asking about? I believe we taped the original drawing tickets on each prize and presented those with the prizes to show the winners that they had won. I don't think we returned anything to the donors, since everything was given away to either a first-draw or second-draw winner, but I can check on that. Feel free to email us at info@sactomofo.com about this or any other question.
3 0
REPLY
May 16, 2012 | 1:48 PM
I should also note that some prizes were given directly by the vendor that supplied them; we drew names, gave those to the business, and they contacted the winners directly.
2 0
REPLY
May 22, 2012 | 1:57 PM
Sounds like somebody didn't win a prize and is bad-mouthing a great organization and event because of it.
2 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background