STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

City plans to cut recreation program for people with disabilities

by Melissa Corker, published on May 6, 2012 at 8:53 PM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 3
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 3
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

With her dark brown hair bobbing at her shoulders as she walked, 22-year-old Brittnay Willeford stepped up to the podium at Tuesday’s City Council meeting, pushed her heavy-rimmed glasses up a bit, and began to read to the council a letter her grandmother needed to help her write.

Despite a reading level that barely tops fourth grade, Willeford came to City Council to talk about some of the things she enjoys most: bowling, skiing and racing down the zipline at Camp Grizzly Beach – activities she will miss out on if the city follows through with plans to cut funding to Access Leisure, a program offered through the Parks and Recreation department that provides sports, camping, social and fitness activities for children, teens and adults with disabilities.

“The camps that are put on by Access Leisure are the most important to me,” Willeford read from her letter during the meeting Tuesday. “All of my friends are there. It is important for me to have a place in the world where I feel like I fit in.”

In this year's budget, Access Lesiure recieved $146,000 from the city to fund social and fitness programs for teens and young adults with intellectual disabilities, programs which serve more than 3,000 people every year, according to Program Director Philip Sinclair. Those funds are scheduled to be eliminated from the city budget starting July 1, according to Program Supervisor Annie Desalerno.

Jenny Yarrow, Access Leisure program coordinator, said the budget reductions would “annihilate” the teen and young adult services.

“The entire department will be eliminated,” Yarrow said. “There aren’t any other opportunities for the people we serve like this. It’s really a shame.”

Willeford and her mother, Lori Bottega, were among the 30 people who spoke at Tuesday’s council meeting about the recreation programs for disabled people in Sacramento that are in danger of elimination with the proposed city budget.

“It’s an organization that sponsors 88 events a year on a meager budget,” concerned resident Patrick McCarthy told council members Tuesday. “We ask you to consider maintaining that budgetary item for time immemorial.”

McCarthy said he is a member of an organization that sponsors athletic events for disabled people with Access Leisure through the year – and he is the father of a developmentally disabled adult son who participates in Access Leisure activities.

The majority of public speakers at the meeting were people who rely on Access Leisure programs on a daily and weekly basis. Many shared personal experiences and pleaded with council members to keep the program active.

“I don’t know why you want to close Access Leisure,” Maria Facio, 33, said Tuesday. "It is my family. I love it. I need it to be open.”

Bottega told council members that Access Leisure has been a “life-saver ” for her daughter.

“She’s made lifelong friends through the program,” Bottega said. “There’s nowhere we can go without her knowing someone. She’ll be devastated if the program is ended.”

Yarrow said Access Leisure partners with many local businesses, such as charter bus companies, movie theaters and bowling alleys, to provide a variety of outings and events for participants.

“We’re not the only ones that lose with the cuts,” Yarrow said. “Those other businesses benefit from us too, and they’ll lose too.”

City Manager John Shirey introduced the proposed budget to council Tuesday. The council will take a closer look at the Parks and Recreation portion of the budget May 15.

Melissa Corker is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

ric
Author thumbnail
May 7, 2012 | 2:54 AM
Keep up the good work Brittany - you are a hero to many of us in Sacramento. Thank you.
2 0
REPLY
May 7, 2012 | 8:46 PM
Every time a city staffer is laid off or a program's funds are cut...remember it is solely due to the intransigence of the police and fire unions..
1 2
REPLY
May 8, 2012 | 9:00 AM
Great story, Melissa...unfortunate as the subject matter is. We have a program similar to this in Placer County that we're struggling to keep funded as well, but we aren't able to hit anywhere close to that number served! Individuals with intellectual disabilities deserve the chance to do what everyone else does, they just need help to do it. Sad to see this program go
2 0
REPLY
JAT
Author thumbnail
May 8, 2012 | 3:57 PM
Tough love time. This is a luxury that should be paid for by the recipients and their families, not the taxpayer. Same goes for school sports and public soccer, etc. You want to play, you need to pay. The taxpayers can't shoulder all the fluff anymore. Yes, it's fluff, not necessary, and those who enjoy should foot the bill.
0 0
REPLY
May 9, 2012 | 8:36 PM
Actually those who enjoy do pay from $3.00 for dances to $450.00 for camp. This is a recreational and teaching program that providers an immeasureable to benefit to the disabled community for little cost to the city. These disabled youth and adults, which includes the Wounded Warriors who are soldiers disabled while honorably serving their country, would be left with little outside stimulation and much less able to fit into the mainstream population. It is essential that this program continue.
0 0
REPLY
JAT
Author thumbnail
May 10, 2012 | 8:01 AM
If it's an immeasurable benefit to so many people, those people can manage to pay more. $3.00 for a dance is ridiculously low, as is $450 for camp. Charge higher rates to make it self-supporting. If the recipients value it enough, they will invest.
0 1
REPLY
P W
Author thumbnail
May 10, 2012 | 11:40 AM
JAT, have you read the classic novel about a guy named Scrooge? Fellow Brit wrote it. I suggest you go back home to jolly old England. Your selfishness is not needed here. (Sound familiar?)
0 0
REPLY
May 10, 2012 | 8:15 PM
We enjoy many luxuries here in Sacramento: Police, firefighters, roads, garbage collection, libraries, museums, parks, pools--to name but a very, very few. In some places in South America (not too far away) people of our (relative) means would not have these luxuries. If we wanted police, we would have to hire them and pay for them out of our own pockets. Which of course is why you can always tell when you are in a rich neighborhood in some countries. That's the neighborhood with the police. So perhaps JAT you're right. We should be paying more for these luxuries. How much are you prepared to pay for your private security?
1 0
REPLY
May 17, 2012 | 9:00 AM
I'd be interested to know if all of the other Parks and Rec programs are being cut by $146,000, or at least by the same percentage as Access Leisure. If not then this cut would be considered unconstitutional.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background