STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Maloofs: 'No arena deal if mayor won't negotiate'

by Melissa Corker, published on April 13, 2012 at 11:08 AM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 3
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 3
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

Sacramento Kings owners and their attorneys told media Friday that not only was there never a solid deal with the city for a new arena, but – if the mayor isn’t willing to negotiate – there never will be one.

“The mayor said he’s not negotiating? Then he killed the deal on his own terms,” team owner George Maloof said at a press conference in New York. “It’s over.”

The morning press conference opened with Kings attorney Barry McNeil giving a detailed timeline of events in the “arena saga,” starting with the Maloofs’ initial proposal to move the Kings to Anaheim in 2010.

“We want to demonstrate to you that the Kings have exercised their best efforts over the past 12 months to get a new arena built,” McNeil said. “The Kings and the NBA have done all they can to create the best deal possible.”

McNeil said the agreement reached in Orlando between the city of Sacramento, arena operator AEG and the team owners was non-binding and all parties were aware that there were numerous issues to be worked out.

George Maloof said he sent the NBA – which was negotiating in the deal on the Maloofs’ behalf – an email listing at least 13 points of contention the team owners had with the proposed term sheet.

The list included concerns about pre-development costs and the city’s assumed revenue projections for the project.

“The terms of the deal that we were presented with (on Feb. 19) were insulting. It’s clear that we did not have a deal there,” Maloof said.

In an email response dated Feb. 29, NBA representatives told the Maloofs that several of the owners’ desired changes to the deal would be agreeable to the city, however, “They say they cannot put the provisions into the document for political reasons,” the email stated.

McNeil said that the term sheet posted by the city and voted on by the City Council March 6 did not include any revisions from the team owners – despite having received the detailed revisions from the NBA the day before.

“The City Council saw a term sheet that was inaccurate and largely irrelevant,” McNeil said. “They voted on a term sheet that they assumed we had agreed to.”

Economist Chris Thornberg, a partner at Beacon Economics, said he was hired by the Maloofs to review the city’s economic impact report on the new arena – and the results of the review were disappointing.

“The revenue projections and estimates for this agreement are highly overblown,” Thornberg said.

Thornberg questioned the basis for the financial assumptions in the report, largely because it relied on a “rosy” economic picture.

“This project would put the city right on the edge of fiscal disaster,” he said. “There is very little room for error.”

Mayor Kevin Johnson and NBA representatives were not at the press conference, however, in an open letter to the Maloof family Thursday, Johnson expressed his concerns about the Maloofs’ intentions.

“Any representation that a deal was not reached is simply not consistent with the perspective of every other party to the negotiation nor the actual statements of the family,” he said in the letter.

“Under no circumstances will the city make material adjustments to the current terms of the deal,” he said. “Put simply, we have done our part.”

Johnson agreed to meet with the Maloofs Friday in New York City, but in his letter Thursday he said there should be “no expectation” that the deal is subject to further negotiation.

When asked about the scene at the Kings game March 6 with team owners and Johnson on the court, shaking hands and celebrating after the City Council voted to move forward, George Maloof said it didn’t mean they had a solid deal.

“No, there were still negotiations to be done,” he said. “Everyone knew it.”

Read Johnson's letter here.

Melissa Corker is a staff reporter for the Sacramento Press. Follow her on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

April 13, 2012 | 11:39 AM
And from the Maloofs, we have the definition of chutzpah.
4 1
REPLY
edited on  April 13, 2012 | 11:42 AM
Maloof me once, shame on you; Maloof me twice, shame on KJ.
4 7
REPLY
edited on  April 13, 2012 | 1:33 PM
Actually, KJ is feeling stabbed in the back by the Maloofs, no doubt. I feel bad for the guy. And the press conference with NBA commissioner clearly shows the commissioner is with the mayor on this.
4 3
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 1:15 PM
That's what I meant.. KJ is the one with egg on his face. Strong Mayor indeed.
2 5
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
edited on  April 13, 2012 | 1:59 PM
Come on. I am not a big fan of KJ but I won't use every opportunity to bash the man. Your bias is showing a bit too much. The mayor isn't the one with egg on his face this time- sorry to disappoint you.
5 2
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 1:45 PM
Huh? As far as I am concerned, KJ has done the best he possibly could here.
4 0
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 3:42 PM
You've got to use incentives on idiots like the Maloofs or somebody else will (i.e. Anaheim). If KJ couldn't tell the Maloofs were going to bail and the majority of fans and citizens could - what does that say about him? Naive at best stupid at worst.

How do you tell if the Maloof's are lying? Their lips are moving.

Kings suck, KJ sucks. Maloofs suck. Sacramento deserves better.
3 2
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 11:43 AM
The latest is that the Maloofs are saying they would rather rehab the Power Balance Arena instead of building a new arena at the Railyards. It sounds like they are aware now that they will not be getting what they want --which is to move to Anaheim. So I see this as a cynical ploy to bide them some time until they have a better opportunity to move the team out of Sacramento. But If it keeps them here I'm all for it. It'll save the city from making a potentially huge financial mistake.

IMO the city should not put one dollar into fixing up the Maloof-owned PBA and there should be an agreement to keep the team here for the next 20-30 years.

5 0
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 12:14 PM
I have long contended that improvements to the existing Arco Arena would be the most cost effective soluition for our market. The Maloofs were dazzled by new arenas in other cities and for too long ignored this very practical solution.

But at this point it is probably too late in the game, the mayor and city council have burned political capital and will proceed with too much caution to allow a new ARCO / PBA deal to materialize.
5 3
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 12:44 PM
I also really don't see how the City and mayor have lost any political capital on this one. It's the Maloofs who have already lost this game. The end goal was always to keep the Kings in Sacramento. It was the Maloofs who earlier had said that the Power Balance Arena was beyond a makeover and if they didn't get a new arena they would move. They didn't expect the city to come up with a financing plan. They called the City's bluff and lost. The Maloofs don't want any deal with the City that keeps the Kings here for the next 30 years so they are talking now about just fixing up PBA. I can imagine what kind of 'make over' they have in mind. It's stalling. So they don't get to move the team this year- there's always next year after that. That's why I think the City should really push for some sort of agreement to keep the team here for at least the next 20 years. That might force the Maloofs to sell the team.

BTW My understanding is that Maloofs own the arena and most of the parking lot, but that the city owns the land where the unfinished baseball stadium site is directly north of the arena. IMO that land should be developed into a recreational park and if the Kings are staying at the PBA then the City should seek to expedite the construction of the DNA light-rail extension.
3 0
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 12:24 PM
It took how long to finally get some momentum on this new arena ? And these jokers squandered it just like that. Playing ball with these guys any longer will make us look like the opposite of a world class city!
3 3
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 12:48 PM
Was the goal a new downtown arena or keeping the Kings in Sacramento?
3 0
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 12:56 PM
For me at least this was about a new downtown arena, and for that I am disappointed at this point.
3 0
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 1:39 PM
It would seem that publicly the Maloofs are basing their opinion about forgoing the downtown arena solely on the analysis of one economist whom they hired.

So my question is, what is the history of Chris Thornberg when it comes to his relationship with the Maloofs? How long has been employed by them? Did he do any analysis on the potential Anaheim deal? Aside from giving a lay natural language analysis of why the deal is faulty did he give the Maloofs or the public his actual data-driven conclusion? Where are the numbers?

Is he really an expert in this particularly complicated area of economic analysis? His CV indicates that his primary real world experience comes from testifying about economic damages in litigation cases (https://beaconecon.com/Documents/ThornbergCV.pdf). Perhaps he is as biased toward a glass half empty view of things as much as he claims the arena proposal is overly rosy.
2 2
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 1:47 PM
I don't like KJ at all -- I've never hidden that opinion -- but the truth is, in this case, the Maloofs, the NBA and David Stern are the bad guys. KJ made way too generous a deal, the Maloofs said it wasn't generous enough, and Stern and the BoG essentially agreed with that opinion.

KJ, a man I don't like, is probably the biggest victim here. And I'm thankful of that, because Thornberg's evaluation of Think Big's report is absolutely spot on. I'm glad to see cooler heads prevailing -- even if the Maloofs did have to shop around for that opinion. That was an interesting tactic -- blame Think Big. Brilliant.

The old alliance is now completely obliterated. Think Big will not be reforming now.

So, do they move this summer, or next? Going to PBP with 1,700 other die-hard fans will be a little weird. I think there's a strong chance a relocation is approved within a month of the end of the season. I know I wouldn't touch a season ticket for next year. Why would I do that?
3 5
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 2:01 PM
Oddly, I think Stern is a loser here more than anyone. First, this is very embarrassing on a way he planned to celebrate with the new owners of the Hornets. Second, he is the champion of small market teams like Portland, Sac and SLC. Third, he is the champion of public/private financing deals like this one. Fourth, his team negotiated on behalf of the Maloofs and the terms obviously weren't right for them (!?).

Tough day for the commish. Fallout still to come.
3 0
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 2:23 PM
Huh? Mr. Stern's press conference clearly indicated he was not happy with the Maloofs.
1 0
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 3:20 PM
Agreed, I think you might be misunderstanding my statement. During the negotiations in Orlando, the NBA was negotiating on behalf of the Maloofs and Stern is having a bad day because the outcome apparently no longer satisfies the Maloofs.
1 0
REPLY
April 14, 2012 | 12:29 AM
I think it's worse for the Maloofs than for Stern - he seems like a good guy to have in your corner, not to have distrusting you on some level. And I doubt they will find anybody else now willing to do business on anything short of an ironclad contract.

My concern is that they will somehow characterize this whole fiasco as being the City's fault and make some kind of legal claim that the City has hurt the franchise's value in an attempt to get out of their current debt.
1 0
REPLY
April 14, 2012 | 2:51 AM
Mike, Because you're the kind of citizen that cares about his community. When you see trash laying around, discarded by some less than caring individual....you pick it up and throw in the trash.

On another note, Are you still thinking about putting your name on the ballot for Charter Commission?

2 0
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
April 13, 2012 | 3:04 PM
Either that or he is a good actor. Maybe Stern and the Maloofs are both playing us. So sorry Sacramento that the Maloofs won't play nice but what can we do about it? I suspect that Mike M might be right and this was all a play.
1 0
REPLY
April 13, 2012 | 3:24 PM
I highly doubt that. It is unlikely that the Kings will be able to move without the NBA's blessing. Stern didn't have to say what he did, but he was clear in his praise of the city and outlined that the city did its part to the satisfaction of the NBA.

Of course, he can't make the Maloofs put up money.
2 0
REPLY
edited on  April 13, 2012 | 4:53 PM
Well it looks like we may be coming to the end. Not all Sacramentans can take pride in the effort to keep the team/jobs here. The STOP people are the worst parasites. And to the self-important and comfortable bommers who never understood why others would care about something as silly as basketball I say you should realize that the world does not revolve around you anymore.
2 6
REPLY
edited on  April 14, 2012 | 2:44 AM
Demanding a public vote equates to parasitic activity? Not really a student of parasitology or even possessing a rudimentary or even elementary understanding of it, are you?

You should probably refrain from using words and biological relationships you obviously don't understand or comprehend.

Sacramento was definitely being "set-up" to be the host organism....for a parasite....that has already infected other small market cities.

A public vote on the spending of over a quarter billion dollars, by the residents affected by this action, will definitely show whose priorities are in line with the majority.

While I'm not afraid of one, I suspect that you, like everyone who tried in earnest to avoid one, are!
4 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background