STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Nonprofit group takes over rose garden, events at McKinley Park

by Melissa Corker, published on March 28, 2012 at 5:00 PM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 4
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 4
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

As the overhaul of the McKinley Park Rose garden nears its May completion date, a neighborhood group is preparing to take control of the garden and events in the park – along with the profit and benefits that go with it.

To date, the city has spent nearly $300,000 on refurbishing and upgrading the popular East Sacramento rose garden, including irrigation system improvements, new walkways and benches and a new entry sign.

The City Council unanimously voted in favor of a five-year license agreement Tuesday between the city of Sacramento and local nonprofit organization Friends of East Sacramento for maintenance and control of the McKinley Park Rose Garden.

The group will also assume responsibility for marketing and managing all events at the garden, such as weddings and family gatherings – and they will be entitled to all revenue from those events.

City Councilwoman Sandy Sheedy said the agreement represented a complete surrender of the city’s interest in the garden – something Sheedy said she did not think was wise.

“I think there is something wrong when we do a renovation of this magnitude and then hand it over to someone else to take care of,” Sheedy said. “We are giving away everything – the next thing is we’ll be giving away the entire Parks Department and I don’t want to see that happen.”

Jim Combs, Parks and Recreation Department director, told council members Tuesday that this is a good opportunity for the city to work with a local neighborhood association to accomplish something the city hasn’t been able to do.

“We’ve suffered a loss of over 80 percent of our maintenance program in the past few years,” Combs said, “and to be frank with you, we’re not doing a good job of maintaining that rose garden.”

Combs reassured the council that the agreement states that proceeds from events would have to be funneled back into the maintenance and operation of the garden to "maximize use" of the space.

Lisa Schmidt, a member of the Friends of East Sacramento, said Wednesday they are just a group of neighbors trying to help.

“Our point here is not to make this a profit center,” Schmidt said. “We’re trying to make it an ‘equal-equal’ – we just want to break even so the garden is maintained.”

In January, City Councilman Steve Cohn and Mayor Kevin Johnson announced that the Friends of East Sacramento had raised more than $45,000 to keep the Clunie Community Center open despite city budget constraints.

The Clunie Center is located in McKinley Park near the 85 year-old rose garden.

The length of the new lease agreement will be for an initial term of five years, with three opportunities to extend the term for additional five-year periods – up to a total of 20 years.

City Councilman Rob Fong said he felt a 20-year agreement with the nonprofit group was too lengthy.

“As it reads now, they can just give us notice if they don’t want to continue, but otherwise it’s a one-way agreement,” Fong said. “We don’t have any ability to agree to or deny any extensions. That feels like a 20-year contract, not five years.”

Cecily Hastings, co-founder of the Friends of East Sacramento, said Wednesday that reducing the term length of the agreement could be a deal-breaker for the donors the group has lined up to invest in the garden.

“They want to have (a term of) at least 10 years to protect their investment,” Hastings said. “Without that, they could walk away and we’d have nothing.”

The City Council ultimately voted to approve the original lease agreement with the exception that renewal terms are not automatic but must be mutually agreed on by the nonprofit organization and the City Council.

The garden has been a popular place for weddings over the years and was closed for eight months during reconstruction.

The rose garden is slated to reopen in early May, according to Cohn.

Melissa Corker is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

March 28, 2012 | 6:26 PM
The city paid for the renovation of the garden. Now the non-profit is taking it over and getting all the benefit of rentals in exchange for maintenance. Are they donors or investors? I don't like the thought of the city giving away control of parks and community centers. I glad there is only a 5 year agreement. Hopefully the economy will improve and the city will be able to regain control in the future.
I don't like the fact that we're contemplating going into debt to fund the arena and we can't keep the parks open. Our priorities are all wrong.
0 3
REPLY
March 30, 2012 | 6:46 AM
Are you aware that Central Park in New York City is run by a nonprofit conservancy?
http://www.city-journal.org/2011/21_3_ny-parks.html
This is a trend in cities all over the country as budgets have decimated park maintenance.
0 0
REPLY
March 28, 2012 | 6:31 PM
Sacramento is becoming less like Bedford Falls and more like Pottersville. I don't like it.
2 2
REPLY
March 29, 2012 | 8:20 AM
What about everyday access to the Rose Garden? Will the group control and or restrict everyday access? Who will handle trespassers or vandals? The private group or the city?
0 0
REPLY
March 29, 2012 | 11:01 AM
The rose garden remains a city-owned property and the terms of the lease agreement state that the garden will remain accessible to the public except for when the garden has been rented out. This has been the case before the city and the Friends of East Sac went into this new agreement - it is not a new circumstance.

Trespassers and vandals are not specifically addressed in the agreement, but it is likely they will be handled as they have always been: by police on a case-by-case basis. Damage caused by vandals will likely be handled by the group maintaining the garden, as has been the case before. When the city is in charge of maintenance, they are in charge of repairing damage. Now, the Friends of East Sac will take on that responsibility at the rose garden.
2 0
REPLY
March 29, 2012 | 8:34 AM
I'm confused by "nonprofit" in the headline and keeping the profits in the lead. Can you please clarify that?
0 0
REPLY
March 29, 2012 | 10:43 AM
There are rental fees charged for use of the rose garden for events, weddings, etc. The group would control those fees (income/revenue) - but that does not mean the group is no longer "nonprofit." The profits would all be returned to the operation and maintenance of the rose garden, per the lease agreement. The profits would not go into the group's own coffers.
0 0
REPLY
March 29, 2012 | 8:36 AM
Also, how much money are we talking about? How many events have been held in the Rose Garden in years past? What kind events were held before? How did the city manage or approve events? What kind of events will and won't be allowed? Questions, I got questions.
0 1
REPLY
March 29, 2012 | 11:09 AM
According to Jim Combs, director of Parks and Rec Dept, rose garden event rentals have been about $5,000 to $7,000 annually (the amount has declined along with use of the garden, thanks to it's disrepair in recent years). That number, according to Friends of East Sacramento, is far below the annual maintenance and operation costs. They do not appear to be in a position to make a profit on the deal.

The agreement does talk about what will happen if the revenue from event rental exceeds the operating and maintenance costs: the money must directly benefit McKinley Park and its related facilities.

Events at the rose garden have typically been weddings, family gatherings and photo sessions. The city rented out blocks of time for specific use of the garden, typically 2 to 3 hours at a time, and generally on weekends.

The agreement does not specify which events will or will not be allowed, only that the leasing group cannot discriminate in it's rental decisions. This has been the case when the city controlled the garden, and there is no reason to believe the parameters for renting the garden would change, other than, perhaps, pricing.
1 0
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
March 29, 2012 | 8:54 AM
I am ok with this. I mean get a grip on reality here. No one/group is going to become rich by renting out a rose garden. It is perhaps much better for a local group that's really interested in maintaining the garden to do so rather than some disinterested city employees. And the fact is, private citizens have been helping to maintain the garden for years. Now time will tell if this non-profit can do it without egos getting in the way. Gardeners are a pretty opinionated lot.
3 0
REPLY
edited on  March 29, 2012 | 1:53 PM
This is simply a transfer of responsibility for upkeep directly to the community and access to park users is highly unlikely to change.

The volunteer efforts of Cecily and her team need to be given full credit for their hard work: Because of people like her, important low cost recreational opportunities will remain accessible to the public during recessionary times, when they need them most. Skeptics should go to the park and literally smell the roses.
3 0
REPLY
JWS
Author thumbnail
March 29, 2012 | 10:05 PM
Well said.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background