STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Feds crack down on medical marijuana dispensaries

by Melissa Corker, published on October 12, 2011 at 11:28 PM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 3
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 3
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

Local medical marijuana dispensaries recently came under fire as the federal government began cracking down on illegal marijuana growing and dispensing operations across the nation.

But wait – medical marijuana is legal in California, right? Yes and no.

In the wake of a June 2011 memo sent to state attorney generals from the Department of Justice warning of the federal government’s intention to shut down illegal marijuana operations, there have been numerous raids on dispensaries in California.

Some local operators have received warning letters that they may be next.

“Joanne,” a dispensary operator in Sacramento who wants to remain anonymous, said Wednesday that local operators have always known the federal government might intervene.

“There’s never been a promise that it wouldn’t happen,” Joanne said. “Everyone is on high alert now.”

Under federal law, the production, distribution and use of marijuana for any purpose is illegal.

Exceptions have been made, however.

In 1978, President Jimmy Carter signed the Compassionate Investigational New Drug Study program allowing a select handful of patients to use marijuana for medical purposes.

The program was closed to new applicants in 1992, largely due to a huge increase in applications from AIDS patients. After the program was closed, 13 patients already in the program were allowed to continue. Of those, four currently remain on the program.

In California, a statewide voter initiative – Proposition 215, known as the Compassionate Use Act – was passed in 1996 by 56 percent of the voters, allowing medical access to marijuana for seriously ill patients.

As of 2011, 16 states have medical marijuana laws on the books that recognize a medicinal value for marijuana. California is one of them.

Despite state laws popping up across the nation, the federal law has remained unchanged – marijuana use for any purpose is still illegal.

In 2007, as Barack Obama was campaigning for president of the United States, he stated his support of legalization of marijuana for medical purposes. However, until it was legalized, Obama said, he wouldn’t use federal resources to enforce the federal law.

A memo from the Department of Justice followed in October 2009, reiterating that the DOJ wouldn’t focus federal resources on prosecuting “individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws” for the medical marijuana use.

Although the memo did not “legalize” marijuana, it opened the floodgates for dispensary operators to open shop in states that had laws on the books allowing medical marijuana use.

Max Del Real, a lobbyist for the Sacramento Alliance of County Collectives (SACC), a medical cannabis trade association, said in a July interview that there were approximately 45 to 65 medical marijuana dispensaries operating in Sacramento county at that time – but that number was just an estimate since none of those operations were permitted through county administration.

According to a city staff report, when the city enacted its medical marijuana ordinance in November 2010, there were already 39 registered medical marijuana dispensaries operating in the city.

A new influx of dispensaries – including some large-scale, industrial marijuana cultivation centers with revenue projections in the millions of dollars – quickly caught the attention of the DOJ.

In an attempt to curtail this potential profiteering, U.S. Attorney General James M. Cole released the June memo stating that the DOJ would use federal resources to prosecute illegal marijuana cultivation, distribution and use – including marijuana for medicinal purpose.

“The Ogden (Memo) was never intended to shield such activities from federal enforcement action and prosecution, even where those activities purport to comply with state law,” Cole stated.

Hence, the DOJ was essentially saying that state laws regarding the legalization of medicinal marijuana are irrelevant when it comes to the prosecution of marijuana growers, sellers and distributors.

Ryan Landers, director for the American Alliance for Medical Cannabis, said he disagrees with the DOJ’s stance on medical marijuana, calling the recent enforcement actions of the Department of Justice “heavy-handed” and unnecessary.

“The genie’s out of the bottle, and the Feds are trying to shove it back in,” Landers said. “We could achieve the same thing through regulation instead of direct attack.”

Despite the recent focus on prosecuting dispensaries by the federal government, Sgt. Andrew Pettit, Sacramento Police Department spokesman, said that the department isn’t “cracking down” on dispensaries.

“We don’t have a narcotics team,” Pettit said. “Our concern with (dispensary operators) is only that they follow the regulations.”

Pettit said the department has specific protocols to follow when an operator is in violation of any local ordinance, and police officers will turn those cases over to the District Attorney.

Joanne said that it’s the “opportunists” that break the rules, doing harm to the industry and harm to the patients.

“There some bad apples out there, yes,” Joanne said. “But it isn’t the industry as a whole. The few that break the rules make the rest of us look bad.”

Still, Joanne said the DOJ raids are not necessarily a bad thing.

“It’s going to be a good thing when the dust clears,” Joanne said. “It will make the industry better, and the grey areas a little less grey.”

Calls for comment to the Department of Justice and the state Attorney General’s Office were not returned by press time.

MEDICAL MARIJUANA TIMELINE
1978 – Federal court rules in favor of a glaucoma patient’s use of medical marijuana in Randall v. U.S.

1978 – President Jimmy Carter signs the Compassionate Investigational New Drug Study program

1992 – President George H. W. Bush closes the CIND program to new applicants. Only four individuals remain in the program.

1996 – California voters pass the Compassionate Use Act (Proposition 215), legalizing the use of marijuana for medical purposes.

2001 – U.S. Supreme Court rules that state and federal laws do not need to conform with each other.

2007 – Presidential candidate Barack Obama states support of medical marijuana legalization, and assures voters he will not use any federal resources to enforce the current federal law.

2008 – The California legislature passes Senate Bill 420 (SB420), instituting a statewide medical marijuana ID card program.

2008 – Attorney General Jerry Brown clarifies state medical marijuana guidelines, requiring dispensaries to become collective nonprofit organizations.

May 2009 – The city of Sacramento enacts an ordinance to allow dispensary operators to apply for special operating permits within the city.

October 2009 – The Ogden Memo is released from the Department of Justice reiterating that federal resources will not be used to enforce current federal laws against medical marijuana users.

June 2011 – The Cole Memo is released from the Department of Justice stating that federal resources will be used to enforce current federal laws prohibiting marijuana production, distribution and use.

Melissa Corker is a Staff Reporter for The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

October 12, 2011 | 11:37 PM
This two part plan is the only action the citizens of the US need to take to end federal marijuana prohibition:
1) EVERYONE that sees these links sign up at both sites and weigh in on the debate
- http://pvox.co/CdiFqY
- http://wh.gov/gDQ
2) Propagate those two links and ensure that everyone that sees them go to both those sites.

Too many people are blaming the President for enforcing the federal marijuana prohibitio­n. Contact Congress (the LEGISLATIVE branch [that's the important one when it comes to law]) via the first link. Contact Obama (the EXECUTIVE branch [until Obama vetos a passed H.R. 2306 it's on Congress - but tell Obama anyway]) via the second link. It really is THAT easy. Participate in democracy!
1 2
REPLY
October 13, 2011 | 9:11 AM
See the open letter from 30million who use the miracle plant, www.the420times.com
Make your voice and your votes count against these actions.
3 2
REPLY
October 13, 2011 | 11:47 AM
Love the timeline! I think everyone is a little fuzzy on the way this issue has progressed so it's nice to see it outlined chronologically.

I agree with Joanne's statement about the bad apples. I think that there is definitely a legitimate need for medicinal marijuana and am still unsure where I stand on the issue of complete legalization but, while I'm not going to judge, I also have many friends and acquaintances who fit this description. I have seen many people essentially Google an ailment, stroll into a dispensary, and come out within the hour, arms overflowing with a ridiculous amount of "medicine." All you need is to memorize a laundry list of symptoms and find a "doctor" (also bad apple) who is looking to make a quick buck.

Anxiety, anorexia, glaucoma, back pain, insomnia, STRESS so on and so on, where does it stop really? It's almost comical how easy it is to obtain a card and I'm just sick of a lot of these dispensaries claiming that they are concerned about the wellness of their patients when more than half of their customers are just experiencing symptoms that the entire world experiences on a daily basis

Before anyone attacks my comment, note that I am NOT saying dispensaries shouldn't be open. I have seen first-hand how medicinal marijuana can be used effectively and improve the quality of someone's life....more than someone, a lot of people.

This whole issue just really fascinates me and I have a feeling it will continue for years to come, back and forth.





7 0
REPLY
October 16, 2011 | 12:56 AM
"I'm just sick of a lot of these dispensaries claiming that they are concerned about the wellness of their patients when more than half of their customers are just experiencing symptoms that the entire world experiences on a daily basis" WELL SAID!! I could not agree more.

I too think it is more about money than it is medicine. Heck, most medicine / treatment now a days is focused on profit and money and not the cure. Heck, when was the last time someone found a cure for a disease?? Disease.... is big business, heck the focus/ money is in the medicine and how to keep folks wanting and needing more and not the cure....

I love your comment and I love the passion you brought with it!!! I have had lots and lots of stress and pain but no amount of marijuana will or could cure it. In fact in might just make me sleep through it verses finding a way out of the maze of pain. Thank you!!
0 0
REPLY
October 14, 2011 | 5:49 AM
The timeline is just a bit incomplete. Sir William Brooke O'Shaughnessy brought "Indian Hemp" [aka "Gunja"] to Western medicine in the early 19th century. It was a major portion of 19th century medication. It was included in the United States Pharmacopoeia through Edition XI, c.1935.

As to how Cannabis came to be missing from U.S.P. Edn. XII-- You need to understand Anslinger. It wasn't "science" by a LONG stretch. It was the unconstitutional [Leary] "Marihuana Tax Act", which was replaced with the even worse Controlled Substances Act on Nixon's insane watch [read the tape transcripts]. "Schedule I Cannabis" is a damned lie that needs to be repudiated, NOT enforced.

Richard P Steeb, San Jose California
2 0
REPLY
October 14, 2011 | 7:19 AM
prohibiting anything that is in demand will never work it will only create a black market and the violence that goes along with it, we need to legalize and regulate. and i love how the dea is worrying about pot when there are tons of heroin comming into the country everyday from afganistan. The only reason this is happening is because pot is the only illegal drug used by enough ppl to justify our unnecessary amount of police and prisions. the war on Drugs has failed every year worst than the last and every year it is giving more funding, that is not the american capitalistic way if a company fails it is shut down not givin more money.
0 2
REPLY
October 14, 2011 | 9:38 AM
"prohibiting anything that is in demand will never work it will only create a black market and the violence that goes along with it, we need to legalize and regulate"
ANYTHING that is in demand?
3 0
REPLY
October 14, 2011 | 7:22 PM
im refering to drugs clearly things like anthrax should not be made legal and regulated. if not legalize at least decrimminalize all drugs, portugal has done this and what has happend is a 40% decline in drug use among teens and adults, less crime, and less spread of HIV because of readily available clean needles.
1 0
REPLY
November 19, 2011 | 7:55 AM
its time. you will see a huge decline in demand for drugs when the tax dollars generated by drug sales are used wisely. Drug users will also become part of the solution as they will fund rehab for those who come to their senses thus reducing their numbers and their liability to the rest of the human race.

Drugs and chemical lobotomy are at the epicenter of the demise of the human race. We have the solutions but are running out of time.
0 0
REPLY
October 18, 2011 | 6:24 AM
fyi, the plural of 'attorney general' is 'attorneys general' not 'attorney generals'

and they say pot makes you dumber..
0 0
REPLY
October 18, 2011 | 8:27 AM
Boy, do I have egg on my face! Good catch, apw76. Our stellar copy editor was out of the country when I wrote this article – he'd have caught my error for sure!
0 0
REPLY
November 19, 2011 | 8:09 AM
An added note we should also zone a portion off of our crippled city much like Amsterdam has done to regulate and control prostitution,drugs and drug users as well, leaving the rest of Sacramento a safer place. Yesterday a stoned driver flung his door out on sixteenth street omitting his canicloud in my face. and nearly taking me out in heavy traffic. A zoned area would solve so many of our problems.
Perhaps the ever declining K street Mall? One big "red light" district? Discuss.



0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background