STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

City Council approves salary contract for new city manager

by Melissa Corker, published on August 10, 2011 at 1:25 AM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

Sacramento’s new city manager will get a 16 percent increase in salary over the previous city manager, making him the highest-paid in city history and the first to receive a labor contract.

John Shirey’s three-year contract, which includes a $258,000 base salary was approved by the City Council with a 7-2 vote Tuesday.

According to the staff report on the contract, Shirey’s annual salary is within the city’s current salary pay range of $187,357-$281,035 for the position.

The staff report also notes that Shirey’s benefit package is essentially the same as for city charter officers such as city attorney and city clerk, with two exceptions: Shirey will pay his own 7 percent contribution to PERS and, instead of the typical 4 percent contribution to a 401(a) plan, the city will contribute $15,000 to a deferred compensation plan.

These changes give the city a net savings of nearly $13,000 – approximately $10,000 for the PERS contribution and approximately $18,000 for the 4 percent contribution to a 401(a) plan.

The new contract includes a severance clause that provides for payment of six months’ salary and medical benefits if Shirey or the council terminates his employment before the contract expires.

A recent press release from Eye on Sacramento, a local political watchdog group, criticized the contract as “fundamentally wrong” for the 16 percent pay hike the contract includes.

“The (pay increase) for its city manager is immensely insensitive to city taxpayers and city employees who have seen their pay cut or jobs eliminated in the current recession,” the release states. “The council's extravagance with its top manager's pay cannot help but make future relations and negotiations with (the) city's unions more difficult and probably more costly to city taxpayers.”

Earlier this week, Local 522, the union representing 550 city firefighters, voted to defer a five percent payraise until 2013 and give six percent to their pensions, according to a labor leaders.

Jaymes Butler, municipal vice president for Local 522 and a captain in the department, told council members Tuesday that, when asked to “do their part” despite being the lowest paid in the region, “our (union members) stepped up to do it.”

Had they known what the city manager’s salary package would look like, Butler said, his union membership would likely not have voted for labor concessions as they did.

“The last time I checked,” Butler said, “none of these (city managers) save lives.”

Councilwoman Angelique Ashby said she’s looking forward to working with Shirey, though she is disappointed with the compensation package.

“It’s unfathomable to grant the largest compensation package in the history of Sacramento during one of the worst economic times in the history of Sacramento,” Ashby said. “It’s counterintuitive.”

Ashby said she could not support the contract “in the same week that firefighters step forward and help us initiate true pension reform for the first time” in the city of Sacramento.

“I just feel like there is no reason to make an exception to the standard of everyone working for the city to pull their weight and do more with less,” Ashby said.

Councilman Rob Fong supported the contract and welcomed Shirey to the position.

“The salary is within the range for the position,” Fong said, “so, yeah, he’s going to get more than we gave (the previous city manager). (Shirey) has an impressive wealth of experience. We are fortunate to have him.”

Mayor Kevin Johnson said he assumed the contract was supported by the majority of the council, but he reiterated concerns about the recruitment process that he expressed in a recent press conference.

Johnson said that the process could have been “more comprehensive,” and he was disappointed that there wasn’t any public input.

The recruitment process wasn't as transparent as it should have been, Johnson said, and he objected to granting a contract that makes Shirey the highest-paid city manager in the city’s history.

“This defies logic, in my opinion.” Johnson said.

With the new contract in place, Shirey will begin work as city manager Sept. 1.

Melissa Corker is a Staff Reporter for The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Twitter @MelisaCorker.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

August 10, 2011 | 4:17 AM
What is wrong with our government??? Schools are being shut down, police officers/firemen laid off and you give this creep more $$. You mean in all this whole state there is no other qualified person to take on the office of city manager for the same pay. This guy better prove his weight in gold... sort of doubt it, just another figure head.
6 1
REPLY
August 10, 2011 | 4:18 AM
What is wrong with our government??? Schools are being shut down, police officers/firemen laid off and you give this creep more $$. You mean in all this whole state there is no other qualified person to take on the office of city manager for the same pay. This guy better prove his weight in gold... sort of doubt it, just another figure head.
4 1
REPLY
August 10, 2011 | 9:36 AM
Sacramento residents must take a long and hard look at the council members that supported this contract. Some of them are up for re-election in 2012.
4 1
REPLY
August 10, 2011 | 9:50 AM
Hiring a new City Manager with a salary of $258,000, an increase of 16%, is nothing but a slap in the face to the many City employees who have been let go because consolidation and “a lack of funds.” It’s not very hard to understand that when there are layoffs, it isn’t fair to increase executives’ salaries. It looks bad, it’s wrong, and it’s sad.
6 0
REPLY
August 10, 2011 | 10:17 AM
Utterly disgusting. Try to explain to all the city employees who were let go and will be let go that there are no funds to pay them yet there are funds to pay this ridiculous salary to this new manager. Try and explain this to the families who will lose their homes because they have been laid off. This is so wrong and so sad.
3 0
REPLY
August 10, 2011 | 11:21 AM
Would be helpfull if we know who the two were on a 7-2 vote so we don't vote them out.
4 0
REPLY
August 10, 2011 | 12:31 PM
MyQuest: Thank you for the question.
Councilwoman Ashby and Mayor Johnson were the two 'no' votes. They based their vote on a contradiction between increasing the salary of an executive at a time when other valuable city employees are seeing their salary decreased.
4 0
REPLY
August 10, 2011 | 11:41 AM
The paragraph about the $13k "net savings" is unclear and also transposes two numbers from the staff report.

[The City would normally have paid about 18k to PERS (instead, he will pay his own contribution) and would normally have paid about10k to a 401a (instead they will pay 15k in deferred compensation). So the "net savings" are 18k+10k-15k=13k (approx figures).]
2 0
REPLY
August 10, 2011 | 12:29 PM
One thing worth noting is that Shirey actually has experience as a city manager, as well as experience as assistant chief administrative officer of Los Angeles County (chief administrator is a county's equivalent of a city manager) and running a statewide organization that focuses specifically on addressing the problems of cities. So, unlike the last two full-time City Managers, he actually has experience doing this job already. The actual difference in total compensation for this new city manager is not enough to re-hire one police officer.

And the potential benefits of an experienced, competent city manager are much larger than that amount. Will he be worth the extra $15K a year? We'll see--and if the Council decides he is not, they do have the option to fire him with a two-thirds vote. That's the nice thing about a council/manager system: the city manager is an employee, not an elected official, whose performance is based on their professional competence and ability to turn the will of the Mayor and Council into action, not their skill as a politician.
3 4
REPLY
August 10, 2011 | 9:44 PM
Actually, Mr. Burg, several police officers could be hired when you figure the cost of this new contract over its term, as well as the unprecedented golden parachute clause included.

And the down side of a city manager is that he's not accountable to us -- you know, the voters. A Mayor with the power to run a city is. That's why most major cities in America dumped the bureaucratic and expensive city manager concept and have elected officials that are accountable to voters.
3 1
REPLY
August 10, 2011 | 10:56 PM
"Accountable" in this context means "can be influenced by special interests."

Figuring the cost of his contract over its term vs. one year's salary is an apples-and-oranges comparison. Meanwhile, having the city run by someone who actually has experience running cities could produce far more fiscal benefit and savings than having it run by, say, a former building inspector with no experience in city management, or an elected official with no required experience in running anything. Which is why Sacramento did away with its "strong mayor" charter a century ago.
1 4
REPLY
August 10, 2011 | 7:44 PM
FYI: it would cost city taxpayers $129,000 to fire our new city manager under the severance provision of the three-year employment agreement the council approved last night.
2 1
REPLY
August 11, 2011 | 12:12 AM
Actually, it would cost more as it would also include Cobra health insurance premiums.

Meanwhile. when you take into account the difference in the pension contributions, the increase in salary costs over the old position is more like 10.5% rather than 16%.
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background