STORYLINE In and Around Sacramento

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Sac Bee Blasts Boycotters Lawsuit Against Sacramento Natural Foods Coop

by Steven Maviglio, published on July 8, 2011 at 9:38 AM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

In a strongly worded editorial, the Sacramento Bee blasted attempts by a political group to sue the Sacramento Natural Food Coop and its Board of Directors, saying the move is "unnecessarily dividing a flourishing local institution." http://www.sacbee.com/2011/07/08/3755093/co-op-shouldnt-be-in-the-boycott.html

"Co-op members ought to be able to make their own shopping decisions. If some feel strongly about the Palestinian cause, then they can opt not to buy matzo, or even bath salts sourced from Israeli waters," says the Bee. "Besides, there are more proper – and far more effective – forums for presenting views on the Mideast than the aisles of a grocery store. Not everything has to be about politics. Sometimes, food should just be food."

The newspaper also supported the Board's decision in rejecting a vote on the boycott, which its Bylaws require it to do if a proposal is in conflict with the Cooperative principles, its articles of incorporation, and state and federal law.

"Co-op leaders make a persuasive case that a ban on Israeli products could lead to a never-ending cycle of boycotts and litmus tests over any number of issues.Should the co-op shun products made in China, which jails dissidents and has an abysmal human rights record? Should it ban products from rural parts of California that voted for Proposition 8, the ban on same-sex marriage? Should it ban products from Arizona, since it passed an immigration law that is widely viewed as hostile to Latinos? Where does it stop?"

The Bee also effectively countered the argument by boycotters that since the Co-op already is political since it carries sustainable products and products that are not tested on animals.

"...Those causes are right in line with the mission of an organic food store that aspires to offer healthy products and to be environmentally conscious. They are of a different order entirely from an issue like the Mideast conflict."

According to an article in the Sacramento Press last week, two local leaders of BDS, a national organization that has targeted co-ops across the United States to promote its political agenda, has sued the Co-op. The Co-op says it may need to expend "tens of thousands of dollars" to counter the lawsuit, funds its leaders say should be devoted to helping local farmers and providing owners with dividends for their patronage.

Disclosure: Steven Maviglio is President of the Board of Directors of the Sacramento Natural Foods Cooperative, long-time political activist for progressive causes, and an organic gardener.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

July 8, 2011 | 11:12 AM
It's outrageous that these people are now suing the Coop. Clearly, they don't care about the store and its mission. Let's make sure their candidates for the Board of Directors are NOT elected and the incumbents are returned to make sure the Coop stays strong.
6 1
REPLY
July 8, 2011 | 11:51 AM
Sow the wind; reap the whirlwind. With the Sacramento Coop and it extremist membership, its never been just about the food. When you purport to be "environmentally conscious", you have crossed the line into politics. The entire environmental "movement" is nothing more than gutter politics loosely covered with a tissue-thin moral wrapper. I welcome the Coop spending its members money on utterly pointless political exercises. Perhaps its membership will think again when its "environmentally conscious" brethren file the next politically motivated lawsuit or boycott.
3 6
REPLY
July 8, 2011 | 2:17 PM
"Extremist membership"? Our coop is proud to have owners who have varying political points of view.That's what makes our Coop strong and why politics have no place at the Co-op.

It is a shame, however, that Ms. Coulter, who barely shops at the Co-op at all, is forcing the Co-op to waste its funds on a meritless lawsuit rather than on sustainable agriculture.
2 3
REPLY
July 8, 2011 | 6:18 PM
Have you ever been in the Co-op...much less a member? I have never read a more misinformed, indeed plain dumb comment.
1 2
REPLY
July 11, 2011 | 9:56 AM
Clearly Ms. Coulter and her group are the most pathetic kind of activists, who attack and attempt to extort small grocer stores for their warped political purposes. Kudos to Sac Co-op for fighting the good fight on this one.

While Sankwaimento's point may be a bit extreme, there is also a kernel of truth in what he says nontheless. It is interesting that everywhere I have lived always has a local co-op facing some kind of division and turmoil. I am okay with that BTW... if a group of people want to have democratized their grocery shopping and can deal with the wackos that will constantly get involved, more power to them.
1 0
REPLY
July 8, 2011 | 4:10 PM
I'm not a member and don't shop at the Coop - but I've been reading these stories for a while. if nothing else, with two opposing groups claiming to be acting in accordance with the organization's own by-laws, while in direct conflict with each other, there's probably cause to re-write at least some of the rules.

In related news, every US product should be removed from the shelves as we just executed a Mexican national in violation of international law. Happy shopping.
1 5
REPLY
July 8, 2011 | 4:22 PM
Tony: the "group" who is suing the Co-op and who thinks the bylaws isn't being followed consists of a handful of political activists with a political agenda.

On the other side, is the Coop Board (unanimously), the Coop Policy Committee (unanimously), the Coop's attorney, the Coop's General Manager, the past five presidents of the Coop, and David Thompson, one of the leaders in the American cooperative movement.
5 1
REPLY
edited on  July 9, 2011 | 10:10 AM
Environmentally conscious people wouldn't sell so many products made with palm oil. Oil palm plantations are destroying the last of the rainforests, leading to increased greenhouse gas emissions and animal extinction.

The Co-op board is well aware of this issue and the store still carries a large number of products contributing to the loss of rainforests.
1 2
REPLY
July 11, 2011 | 4:46 AM
A bit late, but some thoughts on the suit:

http://www.divestthis.com/2011/07/so-sue-me.html
0 0
REPLY
July 29, 2011 | 1:29 PM
While I agree the ultimate responsibility lies with the consumer as to which products they choose to purchase or boycott, it seems to me the elephant in the room is the Sacramento Co-op's By Laws. Why simply didn't the Board TRUST its owners to vote on the referendum as legally required? I'd lay money the majority of owners would not support Ms. Coulter and her initiative.
Terri Fann
0 0
REPLY
July 31, 2011 | 11:56 AM
The Bylaws say that any initiative needs to follow the procedures in the Election Code. The code only allow votes on measures are comply with the Cooperative Principles (open membership, no discrimination), our Articles of Incorporation, and California law. This measure fails on all counts.

The bottom line here is that this measure has NOTHING to do with food or our mission.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background