STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

AB678 moves ahead, federal funds for fire dept more likely

by Melissa Corker, published on June 23, 2011 at 6:28 PM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 3
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 3
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

The State Senate Health Committee unanimously passed Assembly Bill 678 (AB678) Wednesday, bringing the possibility of millions of federal dollars for California fire departments closer to reality.

Currently, fire departments that provide ambulance transportation for Medi-Cal patients are not reimbursed for the cost of the service from the federal Medicare program. These costs are instead absorbed into the fire departments’ general fund.

AB678 would allow fire departments to tap into a federal program that provides a 50 percent match of those unreimbursed expenses, bringing in much-needed revenue in an economy that has forced fire department brownouts and reduced services.

“First responders are bound by law and by duty to answer every call,” said the bill’s author, Assemblyman Richard Pan (D-Natomas). “Currently, they are paid less than cost by Medi-Cal for care to patients they cover.”

Medi-Cal transports in the state went up 19 percent between 2006 and 2009, Pan said. In some fire departments, Medi-Cal transports can be up to one-third of their total service.

Pan said the Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District and California Professional Firefighters have worked together to identify the federal funding, which could total $90 million in the first year, and $50 million in each subsequent year for fire departments throughout the state.

“The (federal fund-matching) program doesn’t cover the full cost of the service,” Pan said, “but it draws down the cost, and every bit helps.”

At the June 7 Sacramento City Council meeting, council members decided that any funds collected through AB678 for Sacramento would be reinvested in the Fire Department.

The additional funds would be used to reinstate fire stations that have been put on brownouts, and/or to add staff for advanced life support medic units.

Each fire department is responsible for submitting its own reimbursement requests, so the amount of federal funds directed to individual departments will depend on the cost of services each one provides.

Pan said the bill has “tremendous bipartisan support,” and he is “cautiously optimistic” that the bill will soon become law.

AB678 will move to the Senate Appropriations Committee and then to the Senate floor for a vote before it is sent to the governor. The date for the hearing in appropriations has not yet been scheduled.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

June 24, 2011 | 9:00 AM
Living on a busy corner downtown, I see fire department trucks being used as ambulances at LEAST once a day. And that's just when I'm home. I would guess that the majority of calls to the fire department are medical, not to put out fires. I'd love to know more about that, as I watched two firefighters load a collapsed indigent into an ambulance while FOUR other firefighters looked on.

There's got to be a more efficient way to handle this other than just getting the feds to pay for more of it.

Ideas, anyone?
2 0
REPLY
June 24, 2011 | 9:47 AM
The best way to handle it would be to get do gooders with cell phones to stop calling for "indigents". The fire department is for life threatening emergencies. When you can look into your crystal ball and take on the liabilities of the dispatchers, then maybe things will change. Until then, every call is to save a life. If you or a family member or friend was in trouble, wouldn't you want more than enough sent to help rather than wait for more to come later?
0 1
REPLY
June 24, 2011 | 10:32 AM
According to a recent report by city staff, over two-thirds of all emergency calls to the Fire Department are for medical emergencies; just 4% are fire calls. Under city existing policy, a fire rig, with four firefighters on board, is dispatched on every medical emergency call along with a two-person ambulance unit.
4 0
REPLY
June 26, 2011 | 9:56 PM
The question of how to dispatch available fire department personnel is a good one - especially given the recent rotating brownouts Sac Fire is under. How many firefighters are "enough?' How many are "too many?"

Is there any way for the dept to know in advance what they are going to come upon when they arrive at the scene? On the one hand, knowing that they are only going to pick up a single indigent with heart palpitations may be reason to send just two responders, whereas knowing that they are coming to a 3-story Victorian apartment house, fully ablaze, with two families trapped inside may necessitate a greater response.

If policy is as Mr. Powell says, and there is no 'as-needed' flexibility i dispatch, then a closer look at policy may be in order.

However, the need for efficiency must be balanced with quality and, when it comes to emergency response, striking that balance may not be as easy as it looks from this side of the siren.

0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background