STORYLINE Dirty Pool: SCTA Style

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Dirty Pool: SCTA Style

by Henrietta Cisneros, published on June 2, 2011 at 12:54 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

By Henrietta Cisneros, freelance correspondent.
June 2, 2011
12:00 p.m., PST

Dirty Pool: SCTA Style

Members of the Sacramento City Teachers Association (SCTA) and a faction of teachers at Hiram Johnson high school are waging a new kind of warfare. Children at Hiram Johnson High School and throughout the Sacramento City Unified School District (SCUSD) are being misguided and manipulated by a group of teachers and union bullies as a means of ousting seasoned principal, Felisberto Cedros.

Conflict erupted on the Hiram Johnson campus between Cedros and a group of teachers shortly after he was appointed principal last year. Cedros implemented new policies at the school ranging from a dress code for teachers (teachers were wearing flip flops and shorts to work), no pets at school, no food or drink in the classrooms, to ensuring that best teaching practices were being utilized in each classroom. Cedros also initiated a summer long cleaning spree in which many teachers were told to remove their personal belongings from their classrooms. During the summer cleaning phase a school employee noted that she observed custodial staff remove six beds, old and outdated textbooks from the 1960’s, and open food items that had been expired for nearly three years. It was also suggested that many classrooms were infested with rat and dog feces.

Some teachers on the campus have resisted the changes almost from the beginning. Now, in a retaliatory effort, many of these teachers have resorted to drafting students on the campus to do their dirty work. That’s right; kids are being recruited and manipulated as a means of assisting SCTA in “dirty pool” tactics. This plan comes to fruition this evening at 6:30 p.m. at the SCUSD Board of Education meeting. Tonight, school aged children that have been taken advantage of and unduly influenced will be marched in front of the School Board in an effort to do away with a principal that has fought valiantly to eradicate an atmosphere of low standards and poor teaching on the campus. Why? Simply put, there are some teachers on the Johnson campus that want things to go back to the way it used to be. How did it used to be? Student expectations were low. Teacher standards were nearly unheard of. Teachers rested comfortably in their poor performances while the union approved former principal treaded quietly until he could retire.

It is apparent that Cedros and his administrative team have created a climate of new expectations at Johnson high school. Many teachers and students on the campus enjoy the new expectations and challenges. Some students have exclaimed that they feel “more prepared for the world after high school.” It is evident that the new leadership is making a difference.

Tonight’s board meeting will be important. Tonight can be a defining moment in the direction we want to take our schools. Do we want “old guard” union lackeys with a track record of failure and low expectations running our schools or do we want leaders with intestinal fortitude that are willing to do what it takes to get the job done? Our children are certainly worth the debate.
 

The public is encouraged to attend and speak at tonight’s school board meeting. The meeting starts at 6:30 p.m. at the Serna center located at 5735 47th Avenue, Sacramento, C.A. 95820.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

June 2, 2011 | 1:45 PM
Wow, you are obviously a shill for the bully Cedros who is currently principal at Johnson. Cedros has systematically "disappeared" almost 400 students. The students are those whose test scores or lack of class credits would make the school's statistics look bad. After all it's a "priority school". But the priority is test scores not students or education. Now that students are speaking up even at the risk of being kicked out of school or not graduating, you are attacking them for standing up for their fellow students and their teachers. This article is shameful as it doesn't even pretend to be actual journalism. it's completely one-sided and resorts to name calling. Two can play at that game. The Sacramento Press has no integrity and neither does this "freelance correspondent".
5 8
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 2:12 PM
Not true at all. Those students that you say "disappeared" were sent to alternative schools to focus on credit recovery. Also, HJ is a transient school. Students enroll and disenroll all the time.

Please know your facts. Your rumors and misinformation are hurting kids.

6 5
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 3:00 PM
klenox

To clarify, this author is in no way affiliated or employed by The Sacramento Press. We allow anyone to post on our site, within our guidelines. If you have any questions or concerns please contact support@sacramentopress.com.
4 3
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 3:02 PM
Yes, if it were a sacpress journalist I'm sure it would be a very thoughtful and balanced piece...
4 2
REPLY
edited on  June 2, 2011 | 1:56 PM
This is a disturbing article...you say, "do we want leaders with intestinal fortitude that are willing to do what it takes to get the job done?" Just what does it take, Ms. Cisneros? I think it's pretty obvious what it takes, it takes getting rid of the riff-raff and that's exactly what Mr. Cedros seems to be doing. He's not fixing the school, he's just eliminating the problem students. It's fake, it's phony, and it's shameful.

The above commenter is right, hundreds of low-achieving kids have been moved out of the school. HJ has struggled for years, especially since the closure of Sac High because HJ must educate St. HOPE's rejects. St. HOPE kicks hundreds of low-acheiving kids out every year and most of them wind up at Johnson. St. HOPE gets praised for their high test scores despite the way in which they have achieved them. It looks like Cedros and the district for that matter, are taking a page from the St. HOPE playbook. If you can't beat them, join them. Kick the underperformers out and test scores go up - that's one sure way to get the feds off your back. This is disgusting and the neediest students lose. It's all smoke and mirrors to create the illusion of success.
6 5
REPLY
edited on  June 3, 2011 | 9:04 AM
"He's not fixing the school, he's just eliminating the problem students."

Like that is a bad thing?

"Neediest" students? Or most delinquent and criminal?

God forbid we ever admit some of these "students" are just criminal thugs who poison the learning environment for everyone else.
4 1
REPLY
June 3, 2011 | 9:21 AM
I see where you're coming from, I do. With kids in the inner city public schools, I know what a problem the district is facing when it comes to the quality of students in our schools. My point is that just shuffling them off somewhere isn't going to fix the problem, it just skirts it. I see public education as an investment in our society - when we write-off a huge chunk of the students, we're not addressing anything. We all have to still live within this society and I'd rather try to fix this festering problem rather than ignore it. I think the best way to address this is to hold parents and students accountable. I'm not sure how to do this other than changing the way people view school. It's not a replacement for parenting, it's not daycare, it's education which should be supplemented by parents. Schools are finally telling parents that they have a major role in the education of their own children. For too long, schools have inserted themselves between parent and child and it's fostered a hands-off approach for the parents and I think that's why society feels comfortable blaming teachers and schools for the failure of many students- it's much easier than looking in the mirror.
2 1
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 2:08 PM
Go Cedros!

Those teachers that are getting those kids to do their dirty work ought to be ashamed of themselves. How pathetic!

What a refreshing article! I am delighted that we are finally witnessing balance to the pendulum between schools and SCTA. The days of SCTA and union bullying are coming to an end.



7 7
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 3:03 PM
I have seen many positive changes at Hiram Johnson since Principal Cedros came on board. Please continue the hard work so that all students can get a great education at Hiram Johnson...
5 3
REPLY
June 6, 2011 | 12:51 AM
You are either one of the teachers who Cedros is nice to or you are a resident who has no idea what is going on in Johnson. Did you go to the board meeting? I doubt it.
1 2
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 3:05 PM
TP:

Thank you for your input. Can you attend tonight's meeting?
3 3
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 3:22 PM
Note to all readers:

My name is Henrietta Cisneros and I do not work for the Sacramento Press nor was I paid to write this article by the Sacramento Press.

I do not represent any of the parties mentioned within the article.

Thank you,

Henrietta Cisneros.
3 4
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 3:40 PM
Thank you for the clarification.
3 0
REPLY
June 6, 2011 | 12:52 AM
My name is Henrietta Cisneros and I have no idea what I am talking about.
0 2
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 3:42 PM
The "problem" is that the whole school board is bought and paid for by the SCTA.
8 3
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 4:49 PM
Certainly seems that way.
5 2
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 4:25 PM
My kid was sent to HJ as a gate school. I felt that he was sent there to improve the scores of the school. That school had a bunch of gang banger types hanging around, and there was a shooting nearly right in front of it. when he graduated we had that open borders lobbyist Ginger Rutland telling the assembly how wonderful all the immigrants were and how they contributed and overcame all these hardships...blah, blah, blah. This school had some good teachers and some that were turds. But you can see that the school is being manipulated by different factions to make them show well for whatever proponent is managing at the time. Seems that's all we do now when things go to hell at school. We move students in or out, and then move management in or out. No really significant changes occur from reshuffling deck chairs.
4 2
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 5:03 PM
Well it doesn't take a genus to see this is a spin piece, full of bias and lacking in facts. Some people just seem to get a kick out of attacking teachers. For example, PocketGopher seems to think that just because the voters agreed with the teachers union regarding who were the best candidates for school board that there was some quid pro quo established. If that were true would hundreds of teachers have been given pink slips while private consultants were given checks for hundreds of thousands of dollars? Instead of my opinion or that of this attack piece, listen to what the parents, teachers, students and administrators say about Hiram Johnson and make up your own minds. I think tonights meeting should be edifying for all who care enough to listen.
6 6
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 5:23 PM
Mr. Barnett:

Your pro-union stances are well chronicled throughout the pages of the Sacramento Bee and the Sacramento Press as is your title of second vice president of SCTA. Can we all just come to a conclusion that your takes in regard to this matter are "spin" and "full of bias?" The fact that SCTA is overlooking the mistreatment of children to advance an SCTA agenda is nausiating and dispicable. You should resign immediately!
5 5
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 7:17 PM
I know nothing about this school or the situation being discussed. But the article is so obviously biased that it actually undercuts its own intended message - it sounds more like a commercial or campaign message than journalism. If the meeting was being billed as a battle between evil goblins and a hero in shining armor on a white stallion, it still wouldn't have been any more blatantly one-sided. I have no idea if this guy is the world's greatest or worst principal, but an article like this isn't doing him any favors.
5 3
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 8:12 PM
Sometimes that is a nice feature, transparency through writing style.
1 0
REPLY
June 3, 2011 | 4:54 PM
We have made several efforts to contact the author of this story by phone and email to ask if she has any affiliation with the issue and/or the school. We always strive for transparency and if turns out she is affiliated somehow, it will be disclosed within the article in accordance with our guidelines.
0 0
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 8:28 PM
The parents and School Board tried to run Mr. Clark out of town too. Maybe this isn't so bad?
1 0
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 10:12 PM
I am a teacher and a proud member of the teachers union, and I clearly use my name so people will know who I am. If my request that people listen to the testimony and make up their own minds is too radical for you, I don't know if I can tone it down. By the way, does anyone know where this writer got her information....she just seems to have some super source, could it be a relative?

Frankly I am disappointed by the Press pretending that since they didn't pay for the article, they aren't responsible for a modicum of professional ethics. A better approach would have been to ask one of the 30 + speakers who clearly described the destructive environment at Hiram Johnson. The students were eloquent and persuasive in their argument to change the administration at Hiram Johnson. Furthermore, I certainly think the Press could have at least identified if the writer had a personal involvement in this situation.

I felt bad for the students when one teacher, in a crude attempt to defend the Principal expressed her disbelief that students could write intelligent comments, using adult vocabulary. She was certainly proven wrong as student speaker after student speaker presented ideas and concerns passionately and in an intelligent manner..
4 3
REPLY
June 2, 2011 | 10:39 PM
Aside from a small number of paid writers, SacPress is essentially a community news blog/forum. If an article is tagged as offensive or spam, it gets close attention - but otherwise, there isn't much cause to vet content or authors. They host the content but they don't produce the majority of it - so I'm not sure what professional ethics they seem to be lacking in your estimation.
1 0
REPLY
June 3, 2011 | 12:07 AM
Thanks Tony.

This is an open forum.

You and anyone else can respond and contribute as well. I believe stakeholders are actually pretty good at telling stories. We do require transparency and we apply very high standards to featured articles and our professional content.
1 0
REPLY
June 3, 2011 | 10:30 AM
JoeBarnett

I think it's great that you use your real name and also great that you've chimed into the conversation. We would love for you to write a response piece if you feel the other side should be represented in an article.

You mentioned that the author should have contacted the speakers at the forum in an effort to represent all sides. We welcome and encourage all sides of every story be told and the great thing about our comment forum is that it's somewhat of a continuation of the story. It seems as if most (if not all) sides of the story have spoken up and been represented in this thread.
1 0
REPLY
June 3, 2011 | 10:45 AM
"It seems as if most (if not all) sides of the story have spoken up and been represented in this thread."

Good point.
1 0
REPLY
June 3, 2011 | 12:08 AM
I am a student from Hiram Johnson High School. I just want to say that if any of you above had attended our board meeting tonight, you would understand that it was not about Cedros making these tremendous changes but how he attempted to make these changes. You did not see my fellow classmates cry out for what they believed in. You did not see McClatchy high stand by our side as well. What excuse it there to pull out 14 teachers (some of whom have been teaching for decades) without any warning at all? Teachers who are loved, not even hated! I am appalled at every "adult" standing up for this tyrant because you're smothering every young adult's voice.The fact that students stepped out of their comfort zone to announce their plea to the board in order to keep their beloved teachers is courageous and should not be viewed as retaliation.
4 2
REPLY
June 6, 2011 | 1:00 AM
Quan - Don't you let this ignorant Henrietta Cisneros get you down. She obviously can not understand what you and your fellow students have been through and since she refuses to gain a better understanding of your pain, her opinion is meaningless.

Please stay strong and do all that you can to get through the dictators rule. His day will come and it will be over. I hope you get to see him pack up his office.
2 2
REPLY
June 3, 2011 | 8:57 AM
"I am appalled at every "adult" standing up for this tyrant because you're smothering every young adult's voice."

Quan, you are substantially closer to being and adult than you are a child. Diversity of opinion is something you had better get used to. Get over it.
1 5
REPLY
June 3, 2011 | 12:07 PM
This is funny as you show no respect for diversity of opinion in your own article. You imply that the principal is right in all things and that the opponents are all simply disgruntled, lazy, or preferring of the status quo. There's no allowance in your piece for conflicting opinions based in good faith disagreements over the circumstances and the best way to handle them. Get over it indeed.
1 2
REPLY
June 6, 2011 | 12:47 AM
The fact that you just told a student of the school who has first hand account of what is going on in that school "Diversity of opinion is something you had better get used to. Get over it." tells me all I need to know about you. I was perfectly happy to just read over a few of these comments until I came to yours regarding what Quan had to say. I have many friends who work at Johnson and I have heard of the many horrible things Cedros has said. You either are full of complete poop or you have no idea what in the world you are talking about. I am not even going to bother giving you any examples, your mind is made up and you can not see or hear the truth.

Did you even go to the board meeting? Did you hear the honesty in the voices of all those students? Do you actually think some teachers got together and had those students memorize everything they said? Did the drama teacher show them how to cry?

You say you do not represent any parties mentioned in the article? Okay, so you are just some concerned adult looking from the outside? How in the world did you for an opinion on this matter?
1 2
REPLY
August 4, 2011 | 5:25 PM
What an ignorant response to a student. This has nothing to do with age or being an adult -- it has to do with power relations, and a student does not have any power when it comes to a principal and/or a School Board. The board may have a student rep but what are they really able to do, other than report out when asked. Ms. Cisneros, your article is clearly biased towards the administration, not to report the truth. Bad
0 0
REPLY
June 3, 2011 | 12:35 PM
The article certainly reflected my opinion, however, I don't think I have made any declaration stating that I did not respect differing viewpoints. Ms. Kirk stated in her post: "It seems as if most (if not all) sides of the story have spoken up and been represented in this thread." I concur with her observation. When another poster (Quan) states that people "standing up" for Cedros is smothering "every young adult's voice" it deserves to be addressed. Good day.

2 2
REPLY
June 3, 2011 | 5:20 PM
well you said the students are "...being misguided and manipulated..." without allowing for the possibility that they were simply stating their own opinions, just as you were.
2 0
REPLY
June 6, 2011 | 12:57 AM
"We have made several efforts to contact the author of this story by phone and email to ask if she has any affiliation with the issue and/or the school." Casey Kirk - Staff of Sacramento Press

Henrietta Cisneros is obviously full of poop.
2 2
REPLY
August 4, 2011 | 5:27 PM
Can someone else rewrite this article so we can get an unbiased version with the truth?
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background