STORYLINE Kings

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Kings to stay in Sacramento – for now

by Suzanne Hurt, published on May 2, 2011 at 9:32 AM

Storyline: Kings RSS Feed

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

The owners of the Sacramento Kings have decided to keep the team here for at least the next season, they announced Monday morning.

The team's owners, led by the Maloof family had a deadline of 2 p.m. Monday to file a request to move the team.

In an announcement emailed shortly after 9 a.m. Monday, the Maloofs said fan support and Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson's push to get a new arena built were instrumental in the decision.

"The fans’ spirit and energy, specifically our season ticket holders, has been remarkable and we are truly thankful for their loyalty," they said in the prepared statement. "We also are greatly appreciative of the support from our corporate sponsors as well as other local businesses that have come forward in recent weeks."

National Basketball Association officials have indicated they will support the team moving next year if a new arena cannot be built to replace Power Balance Pavilion.

"However, if an arena plan cannot be finalized in a timely fashion, the NBA’s relocation committee has assured Maloof Sports and Entertainment that it will support an application to move the franchise to another market starting in 2012-13,” the statement said.

The team's owners have no plans to hold a press conference, said a Kings spokesman.

Johnson said Friday local officials hoped a regionally coordinated effort to build a new arena would make enough of a difference that the National Basketball Association and the Maloofs would not move the team to Anaheim for at least a year, giving the region a chance to move forward with the city's arena effort.

Johnson has scheduled a press conference for 11 a.m. at City Hall, 915 I St.

The decision to keep the team in the state capital came after an NBA fact-finding visit here in the last two weeks.

Last week, billionaire Henry Samueli, whose company manages Anaheim's Honda Center, upped the ante when he offered to personally invest more than $70 million for improvements at Anaheim's Honda Center and provide a personal loan of at least $75 million to the Maloofs.

The Sacramento Press will report on the mayor’s press conference later today.
 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

May 2, 2011 | 10:35 AM
Is this supposed to be good news? They've said it themselves, "if an arena plan cannot be finalized in a timely fashion, the NBA’s relocation committee has assured Maloof Sports and Entertainment that it will support an application to move the franchise to another market".

Really hard to see how this isn't just our fair city being held hostage for another year; the ransom being a new arena complex we probably don't need.

One would think that the city would be looking for ways to fill any void left by the kings leaving; not by begging them to stay -- but by instead capitalizing on what makes Sacramento a destination. In my mind, an NBA team has never been one of those things.
4 10
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 11:17 AM
It's about selling a product, and the product has sucked since at least 2006 -- the year an arena deal made it to a ballot. Since then, the quality of the product has decreased in inverse proportion to the volume of the indignation of Joe and Blow and the Kings Media at the complete indifference of the majority of Sactonians to demoralizing crapshow.

The Purple Stain won EVEN FEWER games this season than the season before -- which had been The Worst Season In Franchise History.

After all the embarrassingly cornball histrionics and the stultifying phumphering and plodding bureaucracy and false alarms and raised hopes and dashed expectations and vacillations from ecstasy to panic and back again . . . the Kings are indeed staying in Sac. Look for them to open the 2011-2012 campaign by losing the first 10 in a row. Don't think it's not gonna happen, either.
2 6
REPLY
edited on  May 2, 2011 | 11:32 AM
Keep in mind that the last tax initiatives for an area, Propositions Q and R, were also an open ended 15 year sales tax hike "for general governmental purposes" (wording of Measure R). And in real political terms, that's as good as saying "permanent". Especially as half of which would have gone to the rest of the county and only half to the stadium (Measure Q).

If we REALLY want a stadium, let's have a small sales tax hike that ENTIRELY goes to the stadium and that "sunsets" after a few short years.
4 1
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 11:47 AM
No tax needed Curmudgeon.

The city needs to do it like it has done many other large projects that cost millions like the current airport expansion (Billion plus) , $751 million “Capitol Improvement Program” in 1987, both the Hyatt and Sheraton, and the convention center expansion in 1992. None of these projects went to a vote of the people.

All these were done by raising bonds and backing it with public money. The bonds were paid off with funded user fees (where ticket buyer pay a few extra dollars each visit), hotel, car rental, parking, and concessions.
6 0
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 12:20 PM
Hunnicutt: Even better.
4 0
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 2:13 PM
Just fact-checking, last season and this season both had more wins than the one before that. Not that the team was great, but you got the facts a little mixed up.
1 0
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 12:33 PM
Let’s not look like sac bee commenters so fast. Let’s look at the bigger picture. A new arena and entertainment complex makes us look that much more attractive for a solid bid for the 2022 Winter games in Tahoe (perhaps why a Nevada based equity firm want to build an arena in Sac). Olympic bids are now more regional than ever.
Example: Vancouver games. What the public spent: "C$580 million was the taxpayer-supported budget to construct or renovate venues throughout Vancouver and Whistler."
How the region benefited: "$2.5 billion of Gross Domestic Product, and as well created 45,000 jobs and contributed an additional $463 million to the tourism industry while venue construction by VANOC and 3rd parties added $1.22 billion to the economy." There are some reports that round this out to be near $10 billion boon to the economy as it stands today and counting.
I think we could do a better job and looking at how this arena will actually benefit us in the future, being shortsighted does us no good. Some might say why Sac and Tahoe for the Olympics? I say why SLC?

Wishful thinking, perhaps, but we could use more of it.
5 1
REPLY
edited on  May 2, 2011 | 1:29 PM
Suzanne, I love how you have been all over this keeping us all informed. You have truly been the minute to minute, second to second, hyper-vigilante source of Information who has kept the most not news friendly observer like me up to date on THIS BIG MESS. I concur with those who think it is a band aid on an ever present oozing sore of the king's horrific record of losses vs wins. And, although the city will have to dig deep to keep them,THEY NEED TO STEP UP AND PROVE THEY ARE WORTH THE LOVE AND SACRIFICE OF THE MOST LOYAL FAN BASE IN THE NBA AND RELUCTANT TAX PAYERS that will struggle to find them a new home!

Last but not least, everyone should congratulate the fervor and tenacious effort of MAYOR KEVIN JOHNSON for making it clear that not only are we a viable NBA city, but, there are fans most willing to fight for their team. We need to remember the thousands of jobs they just saved keeping them here.
1 0
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 2:17 PM
Makes sense to me, but good luck wresting "Sacramento Kings" away from the thing in the minds of those many, and likely most, Sacramentans who see Kings fans, and sports-fandom in general, as the braying, face-painting bastion of Sarah Palin Nation -- the distilled essence of the
dreaded "mainstream". I don't think the prevalence of this virulent "NIMBY" attitude so many Sacramentans have toward the idea of "those people" in their downtown has ever been fully grasped by the Maloofs or anyone in their camp, much less the legions of Rosevillians and Rocklinites who constitute the majority of the Kings' customer base.

This "disconnect" should have been the crux of the discussion all along. If there had never been a pro sports team to begin with, and the arena had been billed as "Urban Revitalization"-this or "Jobs Growth Creation"-that -- or better still "Green"-something -- they'd be having RV shows there as we speak.
1 2
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 3:25 PM
huh? I'm pretty sure I am a Kings fan and many, many people I know are Kings fans and not one Kings fan I know is some rabid Palin supporter.

I'm not sure if just saying that we're all from Rocklin - which I am not, but who cares - makes that so either.

What's the deal? Comparing stereotypes that don't even match seems to make for a bad starting place for this discussion.
0 0
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 8:20 PM
wow thanks for the generalization spew jeff F.
0 1
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 4:30 PM
Well you must at least drive a gas-guzzling SUV, eat fast food, or listen to Toby Keith or the Black-Eyed Peas, right?
2 1
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 4:45 PM
Sports nuts drive their Humvees to the Kings game rockin' the Limbaugh like this: "dum-dee-dum-dee-dum".

Patrons of the arts pedal their fixies to see Ira Glass at the Mondavi blastin' the Neutral Milk Hotel like this: "der-dee-der-dee-der".

Thanks, folks. Please make sure to tip your waitresses.
3 0
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 5:27 PM
I mean well, and I do commit of the listed offenses above, by my NIMBY friends give me a pass
1 0
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 8:24 PM
I think it is the Roseville Roklin mentality that will not support an ESC in sac. They didn't support Rt because it would bring homeless people and "people of Culture" into their Wimbelton White neighbor hoods. Isn't that your logic scale? Sorry but the majority of kings fans are liberal or at least the most involved are.
0 1
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 4:52 PM
I stay home and hide under the bed during 2nd Saturday.
0 0
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 5:34 PM
This is the worse of all available options!! The last thing we need is the Maloofs with their hand out while the area puts together an arena plan. Either let the team move, or sell the team to Brulte... but how ever it is done, get rid of the Maloofs.
1 0
REPLY
May 4, 2011 | 10:30 AM
- - "The owners of the Sacramento Kings HAVE DECIDED to keep the team here for at least the next season"
- - "Fan support and Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson's push to get a new arena built were instrumental in the decision"

BS!!

They are staying in Sacramento for another year because THE NBA TOLD THEM they would be!

We know damn well had the NBA committee approved the move, The Magoofs would have the loading vans at the Arco Arena next weekend, and then heading down south.

This PR release is simply an attempt at some damage control, knowing that they will now need to reley on the fans they had used as a scapegoat for their own financial downfalls.
Now, they are having their hands held by the NBA, and I love it!
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background