STORYLINE City Services

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

City staffers are moving forward on the project to bring cars to K Street, saying Wednesday that the street will see its final days as a pedestrian mall in the fall.

Nader Kamal, a senior projects manager for the city, said the street may be ready for cars by November. People will be able to drive between Eighth and 12th streets once the project is complete.

Cars have been barred from K Street since the 1960s, when the city turned it into a pedestrian mall.

“It seemed to be the trend at that time,” city Transportation Department spokeswoman Linda Tucker said, referring to pedestrian malls.

Thursday, the Law and Legislation Committee — composed of four City Council members – will examine updates to an ordinance on pedestrian malls. The ordinance updates, which would allow cars on K Street, are technical changes. The updates will need to be approved later by the full City Council. The City Council decided last year to dedicate $2.7 million to prepare K Street for cars.

Kamal said construction on K is scheduled to begin in July. The construction work will include installing a new traffic signal at 11th and K streets, changing the existing traffic signals on the street and putting in stripes for two-way lanes.

City officials and the downtown business community have said that cars on K will help attract customers to shops on that street.

The increased traffic from cars “will create just a little more visibility on K Street,” said Denise Malvetti, a senior project manager for the city.

Vehicles will also make people feel safer on K Street because the cars will bring activity to the street, she said.

But Sacramento resident Linda Moss, 63, had a different view of cars on that street. “It’s pollution,” she said, while walking from K Street to a bus stop Wednesday.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

April 21, 2011 | 9:37 AM
K Street has no curbs, no gutters, and the light rail tracks are at the current raised level - I'd be very curious to see the plan for how they will deal with those challenges.
2 0
REPLY
April 24, 2011 | 9:16 PM
Look up a Dutch type of street called a "woonerf": generally a textured (brick-patterned) street where pedestrians, bikes, and cars all interact. They are relatively safe because the streets are designed to be difficult to drive at speeds much higher than pedestrian travel--patterned surfaces, narrow lanes, street furniture.
3 0
REPLY
April 21, 2011 | 10:08 AM
I wish it would be billed as a "complete streets" concept and not PR it as Cars are now back in to create "controversy". Sharing the road for all is the key to a more cohesive society.
1 0
REPLY
April 21, 2011 | 10:50 AM
Thank you for your comment, you are correct. This will be a right of way that will be shared by transit, autos, bicycles and pedestrians (with almost half reserved for pedestrians, 46%) an actual complete street. I have lived downtown for 9 years without a vehicle and am not particularly a fan of the car, however i am also not living with the illusion that cars will be disappearing anytime soon. This project is part of numerous collective efforts to revitalize K Street.
1 0
REPLY
April 21, 2011 | 10:54 AM
stupid, what a waste. this will not "revitalize" this will squander an opportunity to provide pleasant, pedestrian, patio, public space for new businesses and WASTE MONEY THE CITY DOES NOT HAVE.
5 2
REPLY
April 21, 2011 | 12:24 PM
I'd like to see you enjoy that pleasant dream with a sleeping hobo next to you. How long will you sit and enjoy this K st utopia you describe?
1 3
REPLY
edited on  April 23, 2011 | 8:12 AM
cars make hobos disappear? right
1 2
REPLY
April 24, 2011 | 8:37 PM
What kind of car do you drive Naga? How many can we fit in the back seat(s)?
2 1
REPLY
edited on  April 25, 2011 | 2:31 PM
oh, you're not trying to make sense
1 2
REPLY
edited on  April 21, 2011 | 12:12 PM
What is the benefit? So 20 more cars can park on the street? K street from 8th to 12th is a great place to stroll, eat some good food, and not worry about a bad driver. We want this city to be more pedestrian friendly, not less.
2 0
REPLY
April 21, 2011 | 9:02 PM
Actually, there will be NO new parking spaces on K Street. And people already drive down K Street pretty regularly--often enough that people avoid the center of the street anyhow.
4 1
REPLY
April 21, 2011 | 12:28 PM
Want to get more people in downtown? Create places for people to live in downtown.
4 0
REPLY
April 21, 2011 | 1:43 PM
You're right on, Brian. A population base brings incentive to change. Nothing will truly be different as long as K St. is a ghost town after 5pm.
0 0
REPLY
edited on  April 21, 2011 | 9:18 PM
That's also in the plan--about 350 units are planned for the 700-800 block. You are essentially correct, though--when the above photos were taken, downtown Sacramento was the most densely populated part of the city--the blocks that are now Capitol Mall was a mixed-use neighborhood much like Midtown.

Although that is already starting to change--I walked home down K Street tonight, and things were pretty lively at 8 PM!
2 1
REPLY
April 28, 2011 | 3:15 PM
Yes. Living spaces. Isn't that what they "eyes on the street" which makes an area safer.
0 0
REPLY
April 21, 2011 | 12:49 PM
A complete and utter waste.
3 0
REPLY
April 21, 2011 | 8:45 PM
Informative article Kathleen!

It was my understanding the vehicular traffic would be one way only, From 8th to 12th Street to funnel people towards the Convention Center. From my perspective as a light rail driver, I have a hard time wrapping my head around 2 way train and car traffic. Can you verify if the plan was one way or two way traffic in terms of automobiles?

Thanks
2 0
REPLY
edited on  April 21, 2011 | 9:22 PM
Hi Joe,

Thanks for the kind words. Yes, the plan is for two-way traffic.

Cheers,

Kathleen
0 0
REPLY
April 21, 2011 | 9:17 PM
I was a skeptic about this plan but I'm actually starting to like it. For starters, this will not mean more parking spaces--they are unnecessary, since there are about 5,000 parking spaces in lots within a couple blocks of K Street, and adding parking along all four blocks would add less than a hundred spaces (assuming no spaces lost for disabled spaces, hydrants or other uses.) There will be three pull-outs to drop off, pick up, or for valet parking, but no street parking. The top speed will be 15 miles per hour--slow enough to be relatively safe to the nearby pedestrians, and bicyclists sharing the center lane. And part of the cost will improve Light Rail signaling--an approaching train will cause the lights in its path to turn green, clearing the street for the train.

Joe: Traffic will be two-way, not one-way. One-way was an option they considered in the initial report but decided against it.

Mr. Boyer also made an interesting point--this project will be, for all practical purposes, what is known as a "complete street"--a street where cars are permitted, but they are just one of several available transportation choices. If it works downtown on K Street, maybe we can expand the same concepts (wider sidewalks, more bike lanes, more fixed-rail transit, less parking) to other city streets!

Will this be the thing that saves K Street? Probably not, in and of itself. But if it can draw investment and businesses to K Street (and, considering that several businesses and developers are citing the return of cars to K Street as reasons why they are now starting projects there) it might be a catalyst. Don't worry, though--this project will not turn K Street into a copy of streets like J and L downtown, where the one-way flow of traffic is only useful to get motorists into and out of town, rather than a way to get around downtown.
6 1
REPLY
edited on  April 23, 2011 | 8:09 AM
that sounds good. it's still a waste of an existing carless, central, public space and waste of funds.
0 1
REPLY
April 24, 2011 | 10:12 AM
I'm with you Burg, plus you can pull up to Pizza Rock and get that min 30 sec pizza they got coming out of that super hot oven curbside.
0 0
REPLY
April 21, 2011 | 11:07 PM
I agree with this project in theory, But how automobiles and trains play together on K Street could be a different reality. As with anything, Automobiles will have a learning curve when it comes to sharing a traffic lane with a train. If we look at 12th Street from Ahern to J Street as an example, Motorists are still learning 25 years later.
1 0
REPLY
April 22, 2011 | 3:44 PM
It makes me wish they had elevated the whole rail through downtown, the way it is from 18th to 22nd streets.
1 0
REPLY
April 22, 2011 | 11:31 PM
If you will note the photos accompanying this article, both of them feature streetcars in the street along with cars (the one in the 1945 photo is on the extreme left, you can just see the end of the cab.) Admittedly, streetcars are a lot smaller than trains of LRVs. I'm not a big fan of elevated trains--they are a lot more expensive, and I don't think the expense or the added hassle of getting to stations is justified, nor do I think having a big view-blocking elevated LRV line along major streets to be an improvement over having a train go by every few minutes.
1 2
REPLY
April 26, 2011 | 2:15 PM
I'm glad that the 700 block is not going to be a part of this plan. I like the car-free aspect to K Street, and think this is a bad idea.
1 0
REPLY
April 26, 2011 | 11:45 PM
i will second bill burg on this, but i do so on faith that it cannot get worse. comedyspot brian is right on, if a later voice, to the chorus led perhaps by vrilakis. and brian, how about dougbiggie.com?
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background