STORYLINE Art

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

1 of 3
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 3
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

A few more changes are in the works for the Second Saturday Art Walk in an effort to reduce problems and increase the focus on art, city and business leaders said Wednesday.

The changes will take effect in April, when the event's crowds are expected to grow as warm weather returns to Sacramento. The city's Second Saturday safety team has come up with some modifications in the wake of a fatal shooting in September 2010.

The biggest change is a requirement that vendors, musicians with amplified sound and other street performers who are set up on public property – primarily sidewalks or closed streets – operate from 4 - 8 p.m. Live music is part of a growing music scene that has emerged on Second Saturdays.

City officials want street sales and music that have emerged during the art walk to end earlier to create a "buffer" between Second Saturday crowds and late-night revelers visiting bars and restaurants. The change is expected to make it easier to get minors home by the 10 p.m. curfew and allow art patrons time to enjoy art before crowds grow, said Vincene Jones, director of the city's Neighborhood Services Division.

"The thinking was – on everybody's part, even from the community's side – it will (keep) some of the kids from lingering and just kind of hanging around," she said. "There's not a lot you can stop unless you shut it down. We want it to continue, but we want it to be safe. And sane, so to speak."

City officials will provide an update on Second Saturday and nightlife issues at a meeting of the Neighborhood Advisory Group at 6:30 p.m. Monday at Hart Senior Center, 915 27th St.

The Second Saturday safety team, which has been meeting regularly for years, includes Sacramento Police, the city manager's office, code enforcement, neighborhood services, the Midtown Business Association, parking and transportation department staff. In making the changes, the group used suggestions made at a Sept. 25 forum by city residents, Jones said.

Midtown residents and business owners met with city leaders in September after a fatal shooting on Second Saturday. (Image by: Jon Mortimer)

The event traditionally ran from 6 - 10 p.m., but the hours were changed to 5 - 9:30 p.m. after the shooting

The earlier closing time doesn't apply to businesses with Second Saturday special event permits to serve or sell alcohol, MBA Executive Director Rob Kerth said.

The hours also don't apply to vendors set up on private property, such as parking lots.

The city is also requiring special one-day permits for music and vending this year. The permits will cost $25. Anyone using amplified sound must get a permit and permission from the nearest property owner.

Another change is that the city is now requiring vendors to sell only original, handcrafted items or products made in the region. Nothing that is mass-produced or imported may be sold. Appliances and secondhand goods that were sold by some last year won't be allowed, Jones said.

"We had a lot of people coming out with microwaves they wanted to sell. We don't want it to turn into that kind of flea market," she said. "We want it to be art-related."

Private property owners who allow vendors to sell on their property must get multi-vendor location permits.

Sidewalk vendors must have permission from the property owners and business owners that they set up in front of, Kerth said.

Vendors won't be able to set up on 20th Street between J and K streets, and that block will only be closed to traffic when needed for crowd control, he said.

No serious problems were reported during March's Second Saturday Art Walk last weekend. Police will continue to crack down on problems such as underage drinking, drinking on the street and minors out after curfew, said Sacramento Police Department spokesman Sgt. Norm Leong.

Minors may be cited for violating curfew, which is a misdemeanor, and released, and parents can be held accountable if children are out after curfew, unless the kids are with their parents.

"Parents should be aware that the city has a 10 p.m. curfew," he said. "Their children should be picked up well before 10 p.m."

Other changes may be added in upcoming months if warranted, Jones said.

The city's Special Events Ordinance Review Committee is also considering special events changes that may apply to Second Saturday. The ordinance isn't expected to be brought to the City Council until at least late 2011.

The earlier hours seems like a "smart idea" to help the city and police keep Second Saturday safe and family-friendly, then clear the streets before patrolling for problems with illegal drinking, vandalism, noise and other misbehavior, said Midtown Neighborhood Association Chair Matt Piner.

"I think it's a good idea as a start," he said. "You get bad apples in any crowd. The bigger the crowd, the more bad apples you're going to have."

 

Suzanne Hurt is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Twitter @SuzanneHurt. 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

March 16, 2011 | 7:10 PM
I think it's a mistake to think that once the street music stops, the crowds will automatically disperse. I think there will be more problems when the crowds have nothing to do to occupy their attention. Efforts should be made to have bands and other entertainment throughout the evening to give folks something to do other than drink and start fights. Spread the venues out so that not everyone crowds onto 20th Street. The R Street Corridor, K Street and Capitol Mall between 15th and 17th would be great locations for bands to play.
13 2
REPLY
edited on  March 16, 2011 | 9:04 PM
When the galleries closed at 9 last week there were large crowds loitering because the didn't know what to do. Spread the love around to Downtown, and East Sac and Land Park and stop focusing every ounce of enegy in Midtown. The neighborhoods just can't take the free for all street party attitude pervasive among 'leaders' in Midtown. Spread it out and re-focus it as an art-centered event.
13 2
REPLY
March 16, 2011 | 10:31 PM
So by "kids from lingering and just kind of hanging around" do they mean drunk 30 somethings on and near 20th st? Will their parents come and pick them up by 10?
8 0
REPLY
March 16, 2011 | 10:43 PM
Suzanne, thank you very much for reporting on this. I’m sure you have done a great job. The resulting changes are about 90% window dressing and 10% substance. Now we know why residents have not been able to find out over these past six months what changes were being planned to resolve Second Saturday and other weekend alcohol related problems--not only in general but specifically for heavily impacted residential neighborhoods.

Now we know our fears that there would be a big fat ZERO in results for the adversely impacted residential neighborhoods have been confirmed. It is now obvious from these paltry results that the basic rule the safety team had to follow was that nothing could be adopted that would lessen alcohol dispensaries’ profits—no matter what cost to the city PD and surrounding neighborhoods. Therefore, the drunken party scene must be maintained because that is the real money maker and gives Midtown a great reputation as a place to party.

With this governing rule, note that there was not one neighborhood representative on the “Safety Team.” Note also that none of the really effective suggestions made at the forum after the fatal shooting which were intended to alleviate parking and other adverse effects of inebriates in residential neighborhoods were adopted —oh, correction: “The biggest change is a requirement that vendors, musicians with amplified sound and other street performers who are set up on public property – primarily sidewalks or closed streets – operate from 4 - 8 p.m.! FANTASTIC! Cease operations one entire half hour sooner!

That long, entire half hour –“will (keep) some of the kids from lingering and just kind of hanging around” said Jones. Her quote: ”The thinking was – on everybody's part, even from the community's side," she said. "There's not a lot you can stop unless you shut it down. We want it to continue, but we want it to be safe.” That is nonsense and a total distortion of what neighborhood folks suggested at the Senior Center meeting. They came up with a lot that can be done but the committee would have to dismiss when its results had to please the alcohol profiteers.

First, Vincene, scratch the word “community.” That is an inappropriate generalization. The Midtown “community” consists of various business AND residents AND residents were not present in those meetings, so only half of the “community” was there!

Second, at the forum after the fatal shooting, among the many oral and written suggestions was that the Art Walk should go back to hours similar to the very successful 1990’s “art walks” (shut down by the city then)—perhaps as early as noon and ending at 6 or 7. Those suggestions pointed out that these earlier hours would enable more people, including public transit users such as seniors, disabled and youth to shop at Midtown retailers, eat at luncheon places and stay for dinner at Midtown’s dinner houses. This could also reduce visitor-parking problems for the neighborhoods.

So what else had to be changed or omitted to fit their square peg into the round hole created? “Problems” had to be redefined to “SERIOUS.” Leong did not define serious so I guess that means shootings are serious but DUI’s, mere fights, robberies, car break-ins and neighborhood noise and vandalism are not.

Readers may not have noticed but there was no mention either of the city taxpayer subsidized parking at the East End Garage where SS patrons could park FREE for 90 minutes. This benefit is not even on MBA’s website!!

Nor was there any reference to what benefits resident taxpayers get for their nearly $45,000 per year contribution to MBA’s PBID which is heavily dominated by the alcohol interests. Conveniently left out also were PD costs for SS and other weekends to maintain order for the drinkers and any studies that show related revenues to the city exceed city costs.

I’m sure that involved city staff did the best they could within the defined confines, but the results were pitiful and will make no changes in the affected neighborhoods.
11 1
REPLY
March 17, 2011 | 10:26 AM
Dale. A little clarification? Where did you get the $45,000 in resident contribution to the MBA PBID? Individual resident properties are exempt from the PBID. Income producing properties greater than 4 units pay into the PBID. I am curious to how you got that figure.
0 5
REPLY
edited on  March 17, 2011 | 10:08 PM
Mr. Leon is on the Midtown Business Assn Board of Directors.
5 0
REPLY
edited on  March 17, 2011 | 1:31 PM
T Leon: From the staff report that was presented to city council as to what its contribution would be from city properties within the PBID. Check out that report. I didn't say residential property owners, I wrote "taxpayers." You will find that within the PBID city owned Marshall Park, some curious reason the city pays state's portion for Sutter's Fort ($27,000 alone) and the RT properties leased are included for a total (phone call from someone who corrected me) that taxpayers actually contribute 47k each year. This does not include the 90 minute free parking that the city allows Midtown business customers in the East End Garage.
10 2
REPLY
March 17, 2011 | 1:33 PM
From the original Staff Report , Item 26 on the Consent Agenda of the June 5, 2007 City Council Meeting

Park-(Marshall) $11,434.50
2 Parcels that make up Sutter's Fort State Park @ 13,904.35 ea = $27,808.70
City Property that RT leases $ 6,476.50
City Utility Parcel $ 823.28

The City's share of the 2007 PBID Assessment was $46,542.98

The approximate total assessment of all properties within the PBID was $575,000.00
6 0
REPLY
edited on  March 17, 2011 | 2:17 PM
Thanks for the breakdown. That amount is obviously enough taxpayer contribution that the non "safety committee" should have respected and addressed the residential neighborhood's many verifed complaints. The committee only had to do two things that would have solved most of the problems residential neighborhoods face and reduce city PD costs. In addition, both actions would have really made every weekend safer with very little or no loss of revenue to the powerful, self-focused, uncaring alcohol dispensaries. Those are:
1. Change the hours back to closely match the original SS hours which helped ALL Midtown businesses and did not adversely impact residential neighborhoods AND
2. Provide 90 minutes free paring in the private lots like the city does at the East End Garage so the drinkers could park closer to their favorite watering holes.
7 0
REPLY
edited on  March 17, 2011 | 9:45 PM
And don't forget...Midtown Business Assn is getiting in the ballpark of $600k in Community Development Block Grant funds for streelights in their PBID - Property Based Improvement District -which takes in close to $600k per year in assessment fees, while residential property owners who pay property tax and other city fees get zero and large swaths of residential areas stay dark. MBA is contribuitng about 20% of the funds for this project while property owners outside the PBID get screwed again. As if the increase in crime and property damage wasn't enough now we stay dark and dangerous while the MBA PBID gets lit with funds meant for "community development" not business association development. MBA has taken in (and spent) almost $600k per year in fees from property owners for the past four years. What does anyone have to show for it: More violent and property crime , ongoing property damage, more graffiti, Second Saturday ruined and pepetually filthy streets strewn with litter. Thanks MBA and the City of Sacramento for ruining the best thing you had going and making Midtown neighborhoods practically unliveable. You wonder why business is suffering? You can not have thriving commericial districts if the surrounding neighborhoods are in freefall and no one feels safe being here. Yet, MBA continues to spend money on 'branding' while forgetting the basics - no one will come here if they don't feel safe. Light the streets with the cash you already collect from PBID property owners, clean the streets and pay for security rather than trying to do everything on the cheap. I was dumb enough to sink my life savings into a property in Midtown. I regret that decision daily. Thanks MBA for destroying my investment in a community I used to love and once believed in.
8 0
REPLY
edited on  March 17, 2011 | 9:40 PM
So very sorry to hear of your disappointment. I hope you will email your comment to our councilman. If not, I would like your permission to do so. It is very telling and you are not alone. He says that there is more information to be presented at the NAG Monday evening, so hope you will be there to hear it. I plan to be.
3 0
REPLY
edited on  March 17, 2011 | 10:05 PM
I am tired of trying to keep Midtown a nice place to live. No one in a position to effect change gives a hoot about what happens to residents but feel free to pass my sentiments along to the Councilmember.
5 0
REPLY
March 18, 2011 | 11:56 AM
Tom Runge and LisaB23: I totally agree about allowing more entertainment and spreading it out. This month's Second Saturday was actually my first since I've just moved back to Sacramento. While I was away, I heard such great things about it. So I tagged along that weekend and when my friends and I had finished going through the art galleries around 9:00 p.m., we did end up wandering and eventually just going home right after. It's very much possible, we just didn't know where to go also. Is there a map or site with information of suggested routes and what not through the event?
1 0
REPLY
March 18, 2011 | 9:16 PM
Residents have worked hard since the 1970's to restore the historic houses only to have city officials and MBA misuse an art walk as an excuse to throw a wild party to fee the alcohol businesses on J Street. The biggest irony is that Second Saturday is destroying not revitalizing Midtown. To add insult to injury, the resident tax payers are forced to pay taxes to support this out of control street party.
It is too bad we do not have the city and business leadership to match the demands of our city.
7 1
REPLY
March 20, 2011 | 8:05 AM
that's right. "the city and bu$iness leadership" match the demands of the alcohol industry for $ome reason.
5 1
REPLY
March 21, 2011 | 1:53 PM
There is a meeting tonight on this: The NAG will meet Monday, March 21st at the Ethel MacLeod Hart Senior Center located at 915 27th Street.

6:45 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: SECOND SATURDAY and MIDTOWN NIGHTLIFE ISSUES UPDATE

Midtown Nightlife Issues

A. Public Safety

1. Youth & Gang Workshops

2. Neighborhood Watch

3. CERT

4. Lavender Angels

B. Parking

C. Entertainment Permits

D. Communication

E. Next Steps/Follow Up

The City of Sacramento’s Neighborhood Services Division, Police Department, Parking Division, Code Enforcement Division and the Midtown Business Association

SECOND SATURDAY

A. Time Change

B. Permit Requirements

1. Vendor Permits

2. Amplified Sound

3. Permitting on City and Private Property

C. Parking

1. Residential Parking/Enforcement

2. Parking on the Grid

D. Public Safety

1. Street Closures

2. Security Measures

E. Notification



0 0
REPLY
March 21, 2011 | 2:07 PM
http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/47700/Mondays_NAG_to_Take_Another_Look_at_Second_Saturday_and_NIghtlife_Issues#comment-47739
0 0
REPLY
March 22, 2011 | 1:05 PM
Great detail and coverage on this timely topic. Good job Suzanne!
0 0
REPLY
March 24, 2011 | 6:22 PM
Well, there is a great new place to start going on 2nd Saturdays! It's Old City Art Gallery...off the grid on Franklin just South of Broadway across the street from Hideaway bar and grill...Great little spot with Tangent gallery just 4 blocks down the street, Gunthers, Coffee Garden and Pangaea Cafe...awesome early night life...So there IS something to do after 9 and before 10 :D
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background