STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Capitol Vigil For Wisconsin Workers and Human Rights

by Marion Millin, published on February 23, 2011 at 3:08 AM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 6
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 6
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

The sun was still shining on the State Capitol at 5:30 p.m. Monday, at the start of the Sacramento Central Labor Council's Candlelight Vigil for Wisconsin Workers. The crowd grew to an estimated 2,000 people, in solidarity with labor and human rights movements in Wisconsin and beyond.

The supply of signs for "We Stand With Wisconsin Workers" and flameless vigil candles didn't meet the demand. There were handmade signs, such as: "Labor Rights. Human Rights. Women's Rights. We Are One" and "Serf's Unite." 

"We Are One," "It's About Freedom" and other signs from dozens of labor organizations, represented nurses, state workers, educators, fire fighters, law enforcement and skilled trade unions. 

The opening invocation called for justice and for all people to have their basic needs met. It expressed gratitude for "so many who stood up to engage evil: the evil of corporate greed and malice; the evil of government union busting; the evil of protecting the rich at the expense of the poor."

The first speaker was Art Pulaski of the California Labor Federation. "The protests that we see in Wisconsin today are much bigger than one legislative bill or one state. It isn't just about Wisconsin. It isn't just about public sector workers. It isn't even just about union members.

"This is about an assault on the working class values of America. This is a fight for democracy. This is a fight that all working Americans cannot afford to lose."

The speeches and songs in solidarity continued. The best sound quality was in the center front. The crowd that spilled toward the back and onto the grassy sides had some difficulty hearing the speakers. 

A man in a luxurious overcoat worthy of a corporate robber baron, passed through the crowd quickly and commented, "They should have gone non-union for the sound system."

The enthusiasm of the people was not deterred by the cold temperature or the cold-blooded attitude that non-union labor is superior to union labor.

Bill Camp, Executive Secretary of the Sacramento Central Labor Council, gave a shout out to several legislators that he said were "in the house." Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom Tweeted in: "Standing in solidarity w my brothers & sisters across this country."

One of the speakers challenged the legislators who have expressed support, to commit for the long term and write legislation in support of the Wisconsin workers. 

The message, loud and clear from the feeble sound speakers and the strong show of solidarity, matched the invocation at the start of the vigil:

"As we applaud those in Egypt, Iran, Tunisia and Libya, who cried out against government oppression - oppression that seeks to deny their rights - let us also applaud those in Wisconsin and through out this land who seek to do the same."

 

More actions are planned for the week. MoveOn.org announced a call for "emergency rallies in front of every statehouse Saturday, Feb. 26 at noon, to stand together to save the American Dream." 

USuncut is a group based on UKuncut to organize those "ready to help make corporate tax dodgers pay their fair share" also planning events for Feb. 26

Channel 1000 video: Solidarity for Wisconsin workers: candlelight vigil 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

February 23, 2011 | 5:20 AM
"This is about an assault on the working class values of America. This is a fight for democracy"

------------------------------

Really? I can't think of anything more democratic than letting workers vote each year to keep their union representation, and letting workers exercise their free will to decide whether to shell out $500-$1000 in annual union dues.

In fact, it is the current system (in WI and CA) that forces workers to join a corrupt labor union to work certain jobs that is undemocratic and an "assault on working class values"
5 5
REPLY
February 24, 2011 | 5:19 PM
The party of "choice"? Right....
2 1
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 9:21 AM
Workers striking against capitalist pigs is one thing...but striking against taxpayers they serve is another.
5 2
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 10:31 AM
Who is "striking against taxpayers"? These taxpayers are mobilizing to preserve their rights for collective bargaining, which a reported 11 states are attempting to strip away.
4 4
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 11:32 AM
GOOD. Government employees should not have collective bargaining. They aren't working for a large private corporation. They are ostensibly working for the public.
4 4
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 11:54 AM
Are your arguments supported by a complete lack of knowledge of history?
1 5
REPLY
February 24, 2011 | 5:21 PM
Teachers do not pay taxes. The public pays their taxes, because they pay their salary.
4 1
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 9:25 AM
This is the most Orwellian press release I have ever read. It has so many falsehoods and rich ironies in it that one hardly knows where to begin. Life is too short to even try.
4 3
REPLY
edited on  February 23, 2011 | 10:32 AM
This is the most passive/aggressive non-Comment I have ever read. It has so many falsehoods and rich ironies in it that one hardly knows where to begin. Life is too short to even try.
3 5
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 11:34 AM
"Serf's Unite." A rich irony indeed. We the taxpaying serfs, are paying for the knights and manor officials of the public sector.
4 3
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 11:41 AM
(I found the "Serfs Unite" photo ironic for other reasons).

Employees in the public and private sector and those that support them are taxpayers, aren't they?
1 4
REPLY
edited on  February 23, 2011 | 12:13 PM
The difference is, the public sector employees expect the rest of the taxpayers to pay for the entirety of their health care and pensions.

They likewise back union bosses who demand that, in order to work, a person must belong to their organization, adhere to their rules, and pay them for the privilege of working — with much of the money they’re forced to pay going toward electing the very politicians who are enslaving future generations of working men and women by promising benefits packages that are economically unsustainable, and that can never be honored (but that won’t come due until they are long out of office).

You support union bosses who demand conformity, and who frown on individualism among their rank and file. You support rewarding mediocrity at the same rate as excellence; you support wealthy union bosses over private sector workers; you support crooked politicians over reformers; you support the haves over the have nots. What does this say?
5 5
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 12:51 PM
I was there, and thought the whole thing an exercise in confusion. What's going on in Wisconsin is not the same as is not happening here. Showing solidarity with other unions is fine, but what did the whole thing accomplish?
4 1
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 1:30 PM
That's a good question AG. The show of solidarity was beyond "with other unions." It elevated and connected the issues:

"This is about an assault on the working class values of America. This is a fight for democracy. This is a fight that all working Americans cannot afford to lose."
1 3
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 10:09 PM
I still don't get how this is a "fight for democracy"?

Isn't it the epitome of democracy for workers to decide if they want to join an organization, as opposed to making it a condition of employment. You may wish to re-read the definition of democracy.
2 1
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 10:17 PM
On a side note, I am working in China this week. It always amuses me that unions are very willing to do the easy work of "showing solidarity" with other public employee unions when it just involves chanting slogans and waving signs for the TV cameras.

If the reall heros of the American labor movement were here today, they would be asking why you aren't protesting work conditions in Asia, Africa and the many other places where workers are actually suffering.

I always look to the day when a few solidarity types actually try to do something for workers rights in countries where it might actually make a difference, instead of pretend fights for "working class values" and "democracy". There are some folks over here that could use your help.
2 0
REPLY
February 23, 2011 | 10:32 PM
and why do you assume that people can't and aren't doing both?
1 4
REPLY
February 24, 2011 | 12:08 PM
Marion
I would love for you to prove me wrong. Show me some data on dollars spent by any of our public unions on international organizing in restrictive countries. Lets see the names of organizations and individuals funded by these unions that have actually stood up for workers in places that it really matters.

There may be union heros out there. But they certainly cannot be found on the steps of the capitals in Sacramento or Madison WI.

3 1
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background