STORYLINE Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

1 of 3
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 3
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

A controversy is growing over a medical marijuana dispensary that wants to do business in East Sacramento.

There's mixed reaction, but not everyone is happy a medical pot shop may be operating out of a storefront and attached house at 3257 Folsom Blvd. There's disagreement over whether the dispensary has opened shop yet.

Questions arose after representatives of the dispensary and the landlord notified some neighbors the building's lease had been taken over by the dispensary and the storefront's windows were tinted black in late December, then retinted darker in January. The space has been vacant since a charitable thrift store, This 'n' That Thrift & Gift, left in early September.

Half a dozen nearby business and property owners expressed concerns about the dispensary's legality, operations and impact on neighboring businesses. At least three have voiced their concerns to the city, which is in the process of legalizing and regulating such dispensaries following a City Council vote in November.

"I just don't think it's an appropriate venue for what we're trying to do in this corridor," said Peggy Orr, who took over ownership of The Pink House, a shoe and accessory shop, at 1462 33rd St. in September. "I'm not making a judgment on medical marijuana. I'm just saying I don't think it enhances the neighborhood."

But others said they don't think the dispensary will harm business in the area.

"Anybody's welcome to open any business they like, as far as I'm concerned," said D. Neath, who moved Archival Framing to 3223 Folsom Blvd. three weeks ago. "I just went through the death of a friend from cancer. And that (marijuana) was the only way she could eat."

Sacramento's new city ordinance, which took effect Jan. 7, only allows the 39 existing medical marijuana dispensaries to apply for permits. The 39 dispensaries had all been registered as operating within the city by August 2009.

However, the city told about six of those to move because they were operating in residential areas, rather than areas zoned for commercial or industrial use. The dispensaries had to move by Oct. 26, said city Revenue Division Manager Brad Wasson.

All dispensaries now have to go through an extensive, two-phase application process. The first phase includes getting a special use planning permit from the city Planning Commission, which helps ensure locations are appropriate. Those decisions can be called up by City Council members. The second phase involves getting a special operating permit from the city Finance Department's revenue division, he said.

The deadline to apply for the first phase is Feb. 7. Only one of the 39 dispensaries has applied so far, Wasson said.

Some neighbors said the dispensary didn’t meet the city's deadline for dispensaries to move and violates a criteria that dispensaries not be located within 300 feet of residential areas. Two said the black windows make the business look like an adult store.

A political fundraising group – reportedly Republican – recently leased a small office space next door.

None of the business or property owners saw any activity at the site until late December or early January, said Paul Jorjorian, who owns buildings across the street from the dispensary.

Some people believe the dispensary has not opened. The only activity has come from contractors renovating the building, said one person.

Jorjorian and some of his tenants said they are concerned that people might congregate outside the business and cause problems. Parents may not allow their children to go to the businesses, which include a skateboard shop, he said.

The dispensary is called THC, or "The Healing Center," said Justin Karapetyan, who identified himself and Ted Smith as owners.

The dispensary, which has about 350 customers, will sell two types of medical marijuana: one that relaxes and increases appetite, and one that energizes. The shop will also sell small starter plants, edibles such as brownies and cookies, plus cannabis massage oil, lotions and lip balms. They will offer counseling and classes, Karapetyan said.

No one will smoke marijuana on site, he said.

"There is no medicating on premises. That is a stigma we're tyring to get away from," he said. "I would not want somebody opening up a shop and having a smokeout there. Or drive from the premises and, god forbid, get into an accident."

Karapetyan initially said THC had occupied the space for six months, or since mid-July. He later said the dispensary moved into the space in mid-September and began selling marijuana by appointment Oct. 1.

The dispensary that signed the lease for the 4,800-square-foot space had previously registered with the city as a mobile dispensary called CC 101, which was based in Paradise and whose owner was listed as Theodore Smith. The dispensary operated within Sacramento and had initially tried to register to dispense from a private home, but the city wouldn't allow that, Wasson said.

THC hasn't turned in an application to the city yet. However, the owner sent a letter stating that it began operating at the location Oct. 1. The owner or owners now have to prove that they were operating there before Oct. 26, Wasson said.

"I'm not saying they were, I'm not saying they weren't," he said. "I haven't gotten an application to look at." 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

January 21, 2011 | 10:53 AM
What political fundraising group leased next door to the dispensary? It's especially interesting that a Republican political group is leasing next door: how do they personally feel about the dispensary, were they aware of the dispensary being located there before signing the lease?
1 1
REPLY
January 24, 2011 | 4:54 PM
The political group have had a lease for a few years now and I hardle doubt they knew anything before hand. Most businesses didn't.
1 0
REPLY
January 21, 2011 | 11:51 AM
Wait a minute! The thrift shop was still doing business there in September! A business associate inspected the bldg with the property owner for a possible yoga studio in November.
I live down the street and this bldg is not the required 300ft from homes.
We were upset enough in the neighborhood when the thrift store moved. They were there close to 10 years, was a wonderful neighbor. The day after they moved the property owner took down all the information that told their customers where they moved. I guess that should have told us what the property owner thought about the community.
1 1
REPLY
January 21, 2011 | 10:08 PM
Really didn't expect the property owner (runbikeswim) to appreciate my comment. Except that their name is still on the awning this community issue and article is NOT about the thrift store.
Let's stay on point. I do live within blocks of this property and have children that ride past everyday to school, go to the diners, visit the merchants. Not against medical marijuana - but it is scary to see all this security going in just doors from my home. When the abortion clinic was on the other corner you couldn't walk near that area without being accosted. When the half-way house was near Good Eats it brought nothing but problems. We will be forced to wait and see if the city enforces their new codes.
1 1
REPLY
edited on  January 21, 2011 | 11:55 AM
Not against medical marijuana at all but how many dispensaries do we really need? As long as California is keeping up the canard that these facilities are only serving the legitimate medical needs of the population, isn't it reasonable that we limit the number of storefronts selling the stuff. I mean how many dispensaries are there already in midtown. If we are honest about it, we'll admit that these places are primarily outlets for recreation drug use much like bars serving the drug alcohol. And I don't even have a problem with recreational use but do we really need one on every residential neighborhood corner? Just asking...
6 1
REPLY
January 21, 2011 | 11:58 AM
"A political fundraising group – reportedly Republican – recently leased a small office space next door."

Oh no, not those bloody republicans!

5 2
REPLY
January 25, 2011 | 12:03 PM
We are everywhere--and we are coming for you. Muhuahahahaha....

(twirls handlebar moustache)
1 0
REPLY
January 21, 2011 | 12:00 PM
I understand why the property owners and merchants are reluctant to have this type of business next to retailers and restaurants. These businesses have their share of crime - just look at the steel doors , cameras, security people and measures they have to install to do business. God only knows how many problems they have that they don't report.
My question is...don't the homes owners 10 feet away get to say anything? Just how is the city protecting our rights?
4 2
REPLY
January 21, 2011 | 3:43 PM
This state has gone to pot. Smart people are leaving as soon as they can sell their houses. My niece just graduated from college and took a job in Arizona. She is the first in four generations of our family to move out of California. It is sad that California is no longer the GOLDEN STATE!
1 4
REPLY
January 21, 2011 | 5:35 PM
With out a doubt the dispensary is a huge topic of contreversy. The truth of the matter is that in that same Folsom Blvd there is a bar that is open from 6 am and I dont see any uproar being said about having a bar open during day hours in a neighborhood place. I feel like this article was very one sided and did not reach enough public. CBS 13 did an interview and I must say there is a lot of business people who welcome this dispensary. in fact, doing some research myself... a lot of people around the neighborhood are happy that at least it is a legal dispensary. I dont think everyone has to agree with it BUT i think there should be more of a focus of what is THE BIG NEWS.
2 0
REPLY
January 24, 2011 | 6:04 PM
We in the neighborhood are not pleased with the bar. It is a source of problems with their patrons congregating outside and in front. They can be quite noisy and some neighbor claim that their patrons urinate on their property. Our fear is that the dispensary will attract a similar kind of client.
0 0
REPLY
January 21, 2011 | 10:22 PM
I guess it is kinda like publicity. Sacto Press article and channel 3 and 13 all give a great view of our store name at our prior location. We are alive and well - doing business in our new digs at 2590 21st Street, 95818. 2 blks south off Broadway. Tuesday - Saturday 10am-6pm, Sunday 12noon-4pm.
1 0
REPLY
edited on  January 22, 2011 | 1:50 PM
Currently the existing dispensary's are overconcentrated in the Central City which creates problems. I am curious to see how city policy makers handle this one. They just passed a new oridnance which hasn't fully kicked in yet. While I remain optomistic Midtown and Downtown will get some releif from overconcentrated 'services' of this kind, sadly we too often have seen Midtown sacrified for the safety and well being of the surrounding neighborhoods of East Sac, Elmhurst and Land Park and this will probably be more of the same. I wish good luck and success to the neighbors fighting this. Don't be surprised if your Councilmember steps in. He won't do it for us in Midtown re: a whole host of issues including this one but he likely will for East Sac.
1 1
REPLY
January 24, 2011 | 4:53 PM
This business is lying to get their permit to go through. They did not start doing business there until about 2 weeks ago. The surrounding businesses have been in place for some time and spend a lot of money for the location and unfortunately the property owner did not care about any of our opinions. Hopefully these people will be shut down and forced to move
0 0
REPLY
February 16, 2011 | 10:39 AM
Thank you to the merchants, property owners and neighbors in East Sac. Just received confirmation that the Healing Center is not within ordinances to conduct business in East Sac. They have moved out, new lease sign is up and we can only hope that a business that will benefit the community will move into this great East Sac location soon. The system works - but only when people take notice, get involved and make their voice heard.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background