STORYLINE Arena

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Arena task force meets next week

by Suzanne Hurt, published on November 10, 2010 at 6:10 PM

Storyline: Arena RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

Mayor Kevin Johnson is reassembling his arena task force next week to consider next steps in the effort to get a new arena built in Sacramento.

Mayoral Special Assistant R.E. Graswich and other staff from the mayor's office expect to meet Nov. 18 with at least 10 members of the original Sacramento First Task Force. Details for the private meeting at City Hall were still being finalized Wednesday.

Graswich will update the task force on the status of a proposal from their chosen developer, Sacramento Convergence Holding LLC, led by Gerry Kamilos and David Taylor. The developers’ exclusive negotiating period with the city ended late last month after they were unable to produce a viable plan on schedule.

The discussions will consider whether the city made mistakes with the Convergence team, what those mistakes might have been and what a logical next step might be, Graswich said.

"We want to have a frank discussion about where we're at," he said.

City staffers have also said they will propose a way to move forward with the process to the City Council. But that might not happen until January.

None of the seven teams behind competing arena proposals will be there. Five teams, including Convergence, have expressed interest in still being considered.

Some teams are in the process of finalizing updates. Most are essentially the same plans they originally submitted.

Task force members may be especially interested in updates to two proposals they identified as runners-up to the Convergence proposal, Graswich said. One would be from Thomas Enterprises, which owned the former Union Pacific railyards until last month and also proposed building an arena on the adjacent city land. The other was a plan by Ali Mackani and a group called CORE to build the arena where Westfield Downtown Plaza is now located.

Thomas Enterprises' proposal is "problematic" because of the company's financial problems – it lost ownership of the 203-acre Railyards development site after defaulting on loans for the property, Graswich said.

"It just creates questions about their viability, really," he said. "But that proposal was on city property. So that proposal is still of interest."

On Tuesday, Johnson traveled to suburban Chicago to meet with Inland American Real Estate Trust, the new owner of the former Union Pacific railyards. Inland officials sounded "enthusiastic" about the possibility of constructing the arena on adjacent city-owned land, Johnson blogged after the meeting.

A report on next week’s meeting is expected to be released soon afterward.

Johnson is eager to get the task force working again, after the group made progress last spring with its first recommendations, Graswich said.

"Hopefully, we can regain some of that momentum," he said.


Graphic provided by Thomas Enterprises as part of its downtown arena proposal. 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

edited on  November 11, 2010 | 5:51 AM
An Arena may finally get some traction since other uses are so challenging to pencil. An Arena here will transform Downtown and the the entire Sacramento Region. Just look at Petco Park in San Diego and San Francisco's AT&T park.
8 0
REPLY
November 11, 2010 | 10:05 AM
Just make sure to not look at Kansas City's Sprint Center!
2 7
REPLY
November 11, 2010 | 5:47 PM
Best of luck. Our city needs an entertainment complex/arena. Let's get on with the construction!
4 0
REPLY
November 11, 2010 | 11:40 PM
An arena in Sacramento would cement the area for years to come... let's hope it happens!
2 0
REPLY
November 12, 2010 | 5:43 PM
Of all the things KJ's started, this is one I'd like to see finished.
2 0
REPLY
November 16, 2010 | 1:14 AM
I am in favor of the CORE proposal. It kills two birds with one stone. Not only do we get an entertainment/sports complex but we also solve the giant elephant in the room when it comes to K Street which is Westfield. Where Westfield's Downtown Plaza is located has potential to be so much more than the obsolete suburban style mall that it is with barely half occupancy. For any proposal for a new entertainment/sports complex to have a chance it will also have to a) solve the issue of the $60 plus million in debt that the Maloofs still owe, b) what to do with not only the existing Arco Arena site but also the land surrounding it that the City owns and c) reveal a sound financing plan with not only enough equity partners to make the deal a real one in the eyes of everyone (Westfield, Maloofs, City, etc) but also show minimal if not zero public assistance or subsidy (as we all learned from failed measures at the ballots in years past).
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background