STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

1 of 3
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 3
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

 
Two local groups continue to protest the Sacramento City Council more than one month after the council decided to boycott Arizona companies.

One of the groups, Boycott Sacramento, is intentionally avoiding local businesses in response to the council’s sanctions on Arizona businesses. 

Another group, Recall Sacramento, is saying it will attempt to remove certain council members from office. However, Assistant City Clerk Stephanie Mizuno said the group has not yet officially started the recall process. 

The groups formed after the City Council decided June 15 to dispute Arizona’s new immigration laws by boycotting that state’s companies.  The council passed the boycott in a 6-1 vote, with council members Steve Cohn and Lauren Hammond absent, and Robbie Waters voting in opposition.

The City Council stepped outside the court system when it decided to boycott Arizona, said Gerald Klaas, organizer of Boycott Sacramento.

“It’s a step toward mob rule,” Klaas said.

Arizona’s new law states that police officers must investigate a person’s immigration status if they think he or she is an undocumented immigrant. Officers must examine immigration status during “enforcement of any law or ordinance of a county, city or town” in Arizona, the law also states.

But a new federal court ruling on Arizona’s law could complicate the Sacramento City Council’s protest. Parts of Arizona’s law were stalled last week by a ruling from U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton, who deemed them to be unconstitutional, according to the Los Angeles Times. 

The implications of the ruling on Sacramento’s boycott of Arizona are unclear at this point. Matt Ruyak, a supervising deputy city attorney in Sacramento, said the city attorney’s office is now analyzing Bolton’s ruling.

At the same time, city staff is still assessing the dollar amount of the business it does with Arizona companies, said city spokeswoman Amy Williams.

Meanwhile, Klaas, a Sacramento County resident, said he estimates that Boycott Sacramento has resulted in hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost business to companies within the city limits. He said he based his estimate on e-mails from people who said they did not buy large-ticket items in Sacramento because of the city’s boycott of Arizona.

The Boycott Sacramento Facebook page has 3,474 fans, but groups of three and four people showed up at July protests at City Hall, according to the Meetup.com website. 

Klaas said he and his wife estimate they are not spending about $400 per month at Sacramento businesses.

Boycott Sacramento is not related to Recall Sacramento, a group organized by Republican congressional candidate Paul Smith.

The Sacramento City Council is not “pro-business, pro-jobs in any stretch of the imagination,” Smith said. “When they elected to sanction another state, it was none of their business to do that considering the mess the city’s in.”

Asked if his effort was a self-serving move for his congressional campaign, Smith said it is “imperative” that he show the community in his district that he is concerned about Sacramento businesses.

“I don’t want to take over a district in December that’s all boarded-up downtown because all the business was driven out,” he said.

Smith said the group aims to recall council members Rob Fong and Steve Cohn first, but that his group may also try to kick out Mayor Kevin Johnson and council members Bonnie Pannell, Sandy Sheedy and Kevin McCarty. Supporters of an effort to recall the Sacramento City Council are upset with Fong and Cohn more than the other members, Smith said. Fong is ignoring voters, Smith claimed, and Cohn did not vote on the Arizona issue.

The group will not try to recall council members Ray Tretheway, Lauren Hammond or Robbie Waters because they are leaving office, he said.

Mark Williams, the Tea Party Express’ former controversial spokesman, made remarks at a recent Recall Sacramento protest, Smith said, but Williams has “baggage,” and the group does not consider him to be a member. Williams’ statements on a July blog drew widespread media attention.

Smith said about 2,000 people have signed up on the Recall Sacramento website.

Cohn said Smith’s Recall Sacramento group was a publicity campaign. “In my case, he can’t do it legally until next June,” Cohn said. “It’s a waste of time to even talk about it.”

RE Graswich, Johnson’s spokesman, said there is nothing to comment on until the group provides documentation of its recall.

Councilman Rob Fong did not return phone calls Monday afternoon.

Mizuno said Recall Sacramento’s campaign has not begun the recall process. “Right now, there’s a lot of talk, but no one seems to be doing anything,” Mizuno said.

The Sacramento Metro Chamber of Commerce opposed the boycott of Arizona companies. In a June 1 letter to Mayor Kevin Johnson, Chamber President Matt Mahood raised concerns that a boycott on Sacramento businesses could take place if the City Council boycotts Arizona. Read the Chamber’s letter here.  

Photo of Paul Smith by Kathleen Haley. Photos of Sacramento City Council members by Brandon Darnell.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

August 2, 2010 | 9:32 PM
Come on people don't let this issue divide us, this immigration thing. The reason why we have a problem is because we have TRAITORS among us. They hire these illegals and fire our american-asses. SO let's not be fooled by corporate america into pointing the finger at each other, we should get the traitors and stop them from hurting our president and this country with their tea parties and Fox news and race-baiting check this article out I read about this whole scheme

http://apleblog.com/2010/07/22/the-conservative-strategy-obama-is-a-racist/
3 7
REPLY
edited on  August 3, 2010 | 9:25 AM
You're absolutely right. Too often, as in this case, people don't think the issue through. They want fast simple solutions without having all of the facts. If those corporations and big businesses paid good wages, our unemployed could find jobs and the lure to come here illegals would drop dramatically.

Thanks for the link--great article that everyone should read.
2 6
REPLY
August 2, 2010 | 11:23 PM
"Matt Ruyak, a supervising deputy city attorney in Sacramento, said the city attorney’s office is now analyzing Bolton’s ruling."

Hense why the boycott was a bad idea. Not only did it unnecessarily divide the community, it is wasting staff time. The Sacramento City Attorney shouldn't need to waste staff time analyzing a ruling having nothing to do with the city.
8 1
REPLY
August 3, 2010 | 1:11 PM
The ridiculous City Council boycott of Arizona was ill-advised and highly unpopular with voters. It did waste a lot of valuable time and put a target on Rob Fong and his political career, IMHO.

That said, Arizona hotel occupancy and revenue actually have increased since these inane boycotts, some major cities like Phoenix in the double-digits! All idiots like Fong and Mayor Johnson did was make people angry enough to travel to Arizona and spend money!
9 0
REPLY
edited on  August 3, 2010 | 9:51 PM
Rhode Island has been handling immigration issues similar to AZ 1070 for some time. And now we are hearing that Virginia also can address immigration issues during a traffic stop.

So I challenge Rob Fong and the rest of the city council to boycott Rhode Island and Virginia as well.

Rob Fong if this is the "civil rights issue of our time" then how can you not act? Or maybe civil rights only matters when it involves a high profile news story, like the Arizona AB1070 law....
11 0
REPLY
August 3, 2010 | 2:36 PM
I think local city councils should remain focused on the things that define the purpose for which they exist. Perhaps the word "local" provides some basic directional insight.

Economically, I believe part of the problem is wage scale demand of the American people. Eventually the time will come when people will have to choose whether to accept a lower wage, or do some form of work they currently resist doing, in order to survive. Unless another economic breakthrough propels us forward an into a new frontier of production possibility, i think that time will come soon.
8 1
REPLY
August 3, 2010 | 9:29 PM
That is a fantastic point.

5 1
REPLY
edited on  August 3, 2010 | 10:54 PM
The reality is that wage demand is based on what it costs to live. We keep hearing one of the reasons our economy is floundering is people are not spending! When spending goes up, then we'll know we're in a recovery mode they say. Well, duh, low wages don't buy 20k cars, 300k houses, pay for rising utility costs, or enable people to buy a lot of groceries, furniture and clothes, go to expensive movies or other costly entertainment venues. We are fast moving into a two tier society--rich and low income with the middle class making middle class wages fast disappearing.
1 1
REPLY
edited on  August 3, 2010 | 4:05 PM
What a colossal waste of everyones time. *Dismissive wank*
6 0
REPLY
August 3, 2010 | 10:42 PM
Congratulations to "Boycott Sacramento" Facebook group for gaining even more fans than the "If We Get 65 Million Fans, Jesus Will Bring Back the Dinosaurs" fan page!

http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/If-we-get-65-million-fans-jesus-will-bring-back-dinosaurs/110971255584882?ref=ts
0 3
REPLY
August 3, 2010 | 10:48 PM
and Jersey Shore has more viewers than Mad Men... so what's your point William?
1 0
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 9:16 AM
I think William's point is that only a fringe group of right wing religious crackpots would dare question our city council's idiotic decision to put Arizona workers on the unemployment line.

0 2
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 9:25 PM
Love that liberal tolerance of Christians. Don't bother saying you only mean "right-wing religious crackpots" since we all know that's just your word for Christians.
I think the AZ law was fine, but that's totally irrelevant. Our city government should stick to city issues... as if we didn't have enough of those to keep them busy.
I couldn't force myself to agree more with Ahsan Awan's point above.
2 0
REPLY
August 8, 2010 | 11:26 AM
I don't get it. Nothing about this guy or his mission makes sense. Gerald Klass, how does one boycott the city one lives in? Further more how does one boycott the businesses within the city one lives in? Do you drive to the surrounding suburban areas for gas and groceries? Is Safeway taking a hit from your refusal to purchase some Snackwells? Do you buy online? What guidelines do you have for buying outside of Sacramento, driving to the next county, or the closest suburban area?Since when are boycotts even effective any longer for hurting business? It just sounds like thinly veiled racism, xenophobia, and maybe even a bit of reactionary nativism. Say to yourself " I am boycotting where I live" Politics used to be interesting, but unfortunately the Klasses of the world seem to be turning it into a post modernist twilight novella written by English as a second language learners on various inhalants. When did making sense cease to be a requirement for anything? Man up and deal, you make no sense.
2 2
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background