STORYLINE June 2010 Election

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Election results final, runoffs in two City Council races

by Kathleen Haley, published on June 30, 2010 at 9:37 PM

Storyline: June 2010 Election RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

The final Sacramento City Council election results did not yield any last-minute statistical miracles.

Furthermore, a Sacramento city clerk’s predictions about City Council runoffs proved true: The leading two candidates in Districts 5 and 7 will compete in a Nov. 2 runoff election.

The county elections office finished counting ballots from the June 8 election on Wednesday. Candidates Jay Schenirer and Patrick Kennedy will run for the District 5 seat, while candidates Darrell Fong and Ryan Chin will square off in District 7.

Incumbent District 1 City Councilman Ray Tretheway lost his battle against challenger Angelique Ashby — just barely.

A City Council candidate needs at least 50 percent of the vote plus one vote to win. The final count shows Ashby with 50.99 percent of the vote. Tretheway trailed with 41 percent.

Assistant City Clerk Stephanie Mizuno noted that the county elections office will need to invalidate the 25 write-in votes cast in the District 1 race. (There were no official write-in candidates in any of the City Council races, Mizuno said. However, some people wrote in names anyway.) Once those write-in votes are removed from the record, Ashby’s win will be more secure, according to Mizuno.

Incumbent Councilman Robbie Waters lost the District 7 race, while incumbent Councilman Steve Cohn won the District 3 competition.

Brad Buyse, Sacramento County’s campaign services manager, said it usually takes the county three weeks to certify election results. This year’s count was conducted in “a normal amount of time,” he said. He pointed out that state law gives the county 28 consecutive days after Election Day to certify election results.

The county should have data Thursday on how many ballots total it counted for the June 8 election, according to Buyse.

Now that the ballots are counted, Sacramento County Registrar of Voters Jill Lavine will officially certify the election results and send the data to the California Secretary of State’s office, Buyse said.

In response to questions, Mizuno checked voter turnout rates in 2006 and this year for City Council Districts 1, 3, 5 and 7. She said the turnout rate was about the same in both election years.

Voter turnout in District 1 was about 30 percent this year, compared to about 32 percent in 2006, according to Mizuno. In the 2006 District 1 election, Tretheway ran unopposed and the number of registered voters was lower, she said.

In District 3, about 40 percent of registered voters cast ballots in both 2006 and 2010, Mizuno said.

Roughly 32 percent of registered voters turned out for the June election in District 5. In 2006, about 35 percent of voters went to the polls.

About 42 percent of voters cast ballots in District 7 in June, while 41 percent voted in 2006, according to Mizuno.

Photo by Suzanne Hurt.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

July 1, 2010 | 7:45 AM
Hopefully for District 5 one can still write in Terrence Johnson..

Both of our 'choices' have already proven themselves to be ineffective and non leaders...just look at their track record on the SCUSD board The only thing they have accomplished is raising money by selling themselves to special interests.
0 2
REPLY
July 1, 2010 | 2:00 PM
It is not possible (not permitted in the city's charter) for a write-in candidate to qualify in a run-off election.

A candidate must receive more than 50% of the vote to win. If a candidate achieves that in the primary (was was the case in Districts One and Three), there is no need for a run-off. However, if that does not happen, then the top two candidates race off in a run-off the following November.
2 1
REPLY
July 1, 2010 | 8:07 AM
I would comment but Sac Press have become comment Nazi's so I have nothing to say.
3 3
REPLY
November 2, 2010 | 12:59 PM
Your "comment Nazi's" comment indicate you have absolutely nothing of relevance to say.
2 0
REPLY
P W
Author thumbnail
edited on  July 1, 2010 | 9:22 AM
"Incumbent District 1 City Councilman Ray Tretheway lost his battle against challenger Angelique Ashby — just barely."
I wouldn't characterize a 10% margin as "just barely". Ashby carried ALL of North Natomas' precincts and ALL of the downtown precincts!

5 1
REPLY
July 1, 2010 | 10:17 AM
In other elections, that large of a spread has been described as a mandate of the people.
6 0
REPLY
July 2, 2010 | 3:07 PM
To be fair, Tretheway did lead in two the North Natomas preincts: one is in the "Valley View Acres" area, and the other south of San Juan Road west of I-5 and north of I-80. Earlier vote counts did not reflect this, but the final count did.

Ashby led in four South Natomas precincts. It had been five but the Fire Station 15 precinct count ended as a tie.

Downtown went to Ashby and the Richards Blvd. corridor went to Tretheway.
1 2
REPLY
July 1, 2010 | 1:56 PM
I believe the "just barely" refers to the fact that Angelique won "outright" in the primary without requiring a run-off in November -- and in that sense, the statement is technically accurate because the difference between the 50%+1 she needed and 51% she got is 144 votes.

But it is also true that a nine-plus percent margin over an extremely well-financed incumbent and winning outright in the primary is a remarkable achievement -- one that this city has not seen in DECADES.

Make no mistake about it: the win in District One is significant in a NOT "just barely" way.
3 1
REPLY
July 1, 2010 | 2:07 PM
Hi All,

Yes, I was referring to the issue of winning the District 1 seat outright. If you look at Ashby's percentages, she narrowly won the election outright. Have a good day.

Cheers,

Kathleen
1 1
REPLY
P W
Author thumbnail
edited on  July 1, 2010 | 2:47 PM
Point well-taken, Keith...but if the writer is going to include that terminology, it should have been put into better context, yes? To be fair to the author, though, there's probably not a piece written that isn't subject to at least some scutinizin'! The fact that Angelique swept the precincts mentioned in my initial comment is, in my humble opinion, a significant omission in this piece.
5 1
REPLY
July 1, 2010 | 7:32 PM
Yes, I agree.

Kathleen, thanks for covering these updates so thoroughly and consistently -- Sacramento Press has, in my opinion, covered the city council races better than all other news outlets.

It would be cool if you could research when the last time a challenger beat an incumbent seeking reelection outright in the primary. I heard it's been at least 30 years. That is, I believe, the most significant part of the story, and it did get kind of buried under the "just barely" bit. :-) Maybe a follow-up interview with Angelique on how she and her team pulled it off would be of interest to folks...?
3 1
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background