STORYLINE Events

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

Denver's mayor was in town Tuesday to talk about downtown arenas and the need for strong mayors — two subjects close to Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson's heart.

Building an arena downtown could help reinvigorate Sacramento's core, if the success of Colorado's capital city is an indication, Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper said during the Downtown Sacramento Partnership's annual State of Downtown Breakfast.

Last week, would-be Sacramento arena developers outlined seven proposals for a new "sports and entertainment center" in response to Johnson's request for such proposals. All but two were proposed to be built downtown. The same day, a Sacramento Superior Court judge issued a tentative ruling that Johnson's "strong mayor" initiative should not be put on the June ballot.

The arena cannot be anywhere but downtown, partnership board Chairman Kipp Blewett said during his organization's 12th annual breakfast. Speaking to 572 people at the Memorial Auditorium, Blewett said he agrees with the Maloofs and National Basketball Association officials, who are saying they want an "urban" arena.

"Are we a city that can do big things? That question will be answered in the next cycle," Blewett said. "The next decade will look nothing like the last one. The success of this decade will not be defined by suburban sprawl."

Hickenlooper has gotten a lot of credit for Denver's renaissance since first being elected in 2003. He was recruited by Johnson and the business improvement district to speak at the event, just days after Hickenlooper announced he is running for governor of Colorado.

Calling Sacramento "almost a sister city" to Denver, he pointed out many similarities he sees between the two, such as their locations near mountains, campaigns to end homelessness and downtowns that contain a shopping plaza, convention center, and city and county administration buildings.

What Sacramento doesn't have is three sports centers downtown. Denver has Mile High Stadium, Pepsi Center and Coors Field. Downtown Denver's revitalization really took off after the first, Coors Field, was built in 1995 two blocks from Union Station, he said. Businesses like his brewpub, also nearby, saw their sales rocket, and a housing boom was launched.

"People saw downtown was a place they wanted to come," Hickenlooper said.

Another similarity between the two cities is that both are based on the "rugged individualism that opened up the West," he said. That spirit has sometimes meant the ones who got ahead were determined by how hard they worked and whether they're willing to collaborate.

Denver, with a population of nearly 600,000, has benefited by collaborating with neighboring suburbs and through Hickenlooper's desire to collaborate with other politicians, he said.

"You can't get that level of cooperation with a city manager-type system," he said. "You can't have a corporation run by a board of directors and the CEO has little power."

Having a strong mayor helped Denver win all three sports centers from the 'burbs, which mostly had the city manager form of government, he said. Denver played the suburbs against each other and got all three.

The strong mayor system also allowed Hickenlooper to hire experienced people who like to work on the cutting edge for his administration.

"That's one of the benefits of strong mayor. It allows you to bring in a talented group of people," he said. "They're able to inject energy and a large amount of entrepreneurship into a bureaucracy."

Calling Hickenlooper a role model, Johnson vowed during his remarks at the event that he and the Sacramento City Council will learn to collaborate more in coming months.

"We are going to work better together than we have ever worked," Johnson said. "We are going to put Sacramento first when it comes to moving forward."

 

Photos provided by Downtown Sacramento Partnership.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

January 19, 2010 | 10:57 PM
A few important differences between Denver and the Boss Mayor Initiative:

1. Denver's Mayor can hire/fire 50 employees. The Boss Mayor Initiative would allow Sacramento's mayor to hire/fire 800.
2. Term limits, Denver's Mayor is limited to two terms. The Boss Mayor Initiative has no term limits. The fun never has to end!
3. Denver's charter provides for the election of an independent City Clerk and City Auditor. The Boss Mayor Initiative does not. None of those pesky checks and balances.
4. Denver's budget must be approved by the City Council. The Boss Mayor Initiative would allow the Mayor's budget to automatically become law after 30 days.

Read all about it:
http://bossmayor.com/2010/01/state-of-downtown-is-denver.html
9 0
REPLY
edited on  January 20, 2010 | 11:51 AM
In addition to Devin's excellent points,

1. Denver, like SF & LA, is a combined city and county. Colorado is a state with less than 5million people with over 1/10th of the population living in Denver, a significantly different dynamic

2.Power combined with Ego's greater than the size of Texas & ethics smaller than a Pixel are to be avoided at all cost.

3.The basis of the Lawsuit challenge to the SMI is unconstitutional use of the initiative process. Remember that when McMaster's tentative ruling is sustained and upheld,

That equates to ABUSE of the initiative process-Not a violation of a citizen right to vote.

A complete disregard for the California State Constitution is something we should hold SMI crafters, spin shysters & $upporters accountable for !.

A individual's pattern of behavior, continued.
7 0
REPLY
May 3, 2010 | 3:05 PM
Devin, great comments. If you go to my site, you will find considerable information on the various forms of government. The people of Sacramento would be making a big mistake to go to a Mayor form of government. Would you believe, that before the new Mayor could take office in San Diego after they converted he was arrested for public corruption and spent time in jail. Over 80% of the Mayor's and Council members arrested for corruption served under the strong Mayor form of government. Mayors can hire their family friends and political allies. City managers hire professionals. Don't be fooled. www.cmrji.com
0 0
REPLY
January 20, 2010 | 12:48 AM
Oh brother, leave it to KJ to import a shill for his SMI and other backroom deals sought by his backers... City Manager systems, or as I prefer, democratically run cities, can do 'big things' if 'big ideas' are shared among all those vested with the authority to make changes happen... It is absurd to think that the only way to get 'big ideas' onto the slate is through the dictatorial system sought by this mayor and his tribe...

But more, I've been to Denver... and while it's a lovely city, there's nothing truly extraordinary about its downtown's vitality -- it's actually quite deserted at night, especially if one stays in one of the downtown hotels... Painting it as some panacea of 'success' is just not true...

Perhaps KJ was relying on a perception that Sacramentans don't travel very much, since we are so 'backward' and 'cowtown' in his eyes...
6 0
REPLY
January 20, 2010 | 11:38 AM
"Are we a city that can do big things? That question will be answered in the next cycle," Blewett said. "The next decade will look nothing like the last one. The success of this decade will not be defined by suburban sprawl."

I'm so glad we don't have Fargo at the helm paving over our floodplain anymore.
0 2
REPLY
January 20, 2010 | 2:14 PM
Actually, it was Angelo Tsakapoulos, a supporter of KJ and his tribe, who 'paved over' most of Natomas... As usual, and as with most, if not all of, KJ's supporters, you're wrong.... again...
3 0
REPLY
January 20, 2010 | 2:24 PM
Thank you Devin, fifthgen...bbbbmer for the information/ comments posted; you- your comments are really appreciated and I respect you so much for your commitment to truth and uncovering much that - without you- would be hiddened or overshadowed. Thank you so very much
3 0
REPLY
edited on  January 20, 2010 | 3:10 PM
Hickenlooper's core message was progress came to Denver as a result of cooperation between once warring factions. Imagine the progress this city would enjoy if the sons of Sacramento could align their agendas and synergy multiplied their strengths. As is is, there are brickbats in the streets...and here in the comments.

By the way, LoDo rocks.
1 0
REPLY
January 25, 2010 | 9:22 AM
Based on the comments of the "Regular Crowd" that responds to almost every story in SacPress, we are far from that achieving that agenda. I am pretty sure if KJ said up was up and down was down they would first tell you up is down and down is up and at the same time tie it into some grand agenda of KJ and his "tribe" to pave over the rest of Sacramento. Ugghhh!
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background