STORYLINE Natomas Chamber Criticizes NBA And Maloofs

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Natomas Chamber Campaigns To Keep Arena In Natomas

by Brandy Tuzon, published on January 15, 2010 at 5:57 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

The Natomas Chamber of Commerce today criticized the NBA and Maloofs for backing an arena plan weeks before the Sacramento First task force is scheduled to make its recommendations to Mayor Kevin Johnson and the public.

In a statment released today, chamber officials announced plans to launch a "Keep The Arena In Natomas" campaign during a press conference set for 11 a.m. Saturday at Five Star Way and Del Paso Road. The chamber is a partner in the Natomas ESC group which presented a proposal at City Hall yesterday for an arena and entertainment complex on 100 city-owned acres located north of Arco Arena.

 

"Natomas needs representation in the discussion about where a new sports complex should be located," said Marni Leger, a chamber board member and "Keep the Arena in Natomas" campaign chairperson.

 

Chamber officials said they were disappointed in the NBA and Maloofs who yesterday announced support for a plan that would involve complex land swaps and relocating the State fairgrounds onto the current arena site in Natomas. The 12-person Sacramento First task force has yet to fully review all seven proposals put forth by developers and is not scheduled to make a recommendation until March 11.

Said Leger, "In tight times, the more economical proposal to build a new arena in Natomas should be considered."
 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

January 16, 2010 | 10:59 AM
Continuing the practice of spreading the civic amenities into the suburbs will only add to traffic congestion and continue the planning practice of the 70’s and 80’s. We need to address the issues of not realizing an environmentally friendly city and I feel this is the first step towards that goal. Natomas does not have a light rail link or an Amtrak station or even a bus stop to the stadium. By moving the entertainment facility into the rail yards we can take the first step towards creating a new dense downtown environment that is successful for the environment and the city.
2 2
REPLY
January 16, 2010 | 7:26 PM
An ARCO retrofit is the least cost option, at a time when we have far more pressing needs than doling out cash on behalf of overpaid players and ostentatious owners who have no chance of fulfilling their 'commitment' announced in the 'land swap' deal...

As for downtown density, this is an amenity??? The downtown needs housing -- not an arena...
3 2
REPLY
January 16, 2010 | 10:23 PM
If you build it, they will come.
Keep the new arena in Natomas.
2 2
REPLY
January 17, 2010 | 11:51 AM
Unfortunately, though many cities have done this, this is why it's actually more expensive:

1) You can't expand to add another level of luxury boxes (all arenas these days have 2 rows of luxury boxes - they bring in the most revenue)

2) The walls of Arco are only so wide. The already slim concourse around the arena can't possibly be expanded without knocking down 2 walls and a roof.

3) The dressing rooms for entertainers (whether they are Britney Spears of the Kings) are already way small.

4) The pipes for icemaking are laid in concrete and need to be ripped up

In essence, you'd have to knock down 2 walls and a roof to do this, and you're basically starting over. The Kings would have to play in Oakland for 3 years or Memorial Auditorium (which seats maybe 3000), which would kill revenue. We don't have the luxury of having old arenas nearby.

I'm not sure where people get this "least cost" option. None of this takes in to consideration that you don't want to pay for it either - you'd rather shoot down a great plan that's paid for.

As for downtown needing housing - it already has housing. Not sure you have been to downtown on a weekend or weekday night lately but it's a ghost town (everyone is in midtown). It needs something to kickstart an entertainment district.

The Railyards is where it needs to be. It's next to the train stations, right off the freeway, and oh yeah... it's paid for.
2 2
REPLY
edited on  January 17, 2010 | 1:28 PM
The reason why everyone is in midtown is because Midtown has housing, thus there are enough people in the neighborhood to make it not feel like a ghost town. This draws visitors from the suburbs. Downtown is a ghost town because it has a severe lack of residential units. The residential units there are limited to SRO hotels, senior housing, 2-3 apartment buildings, and the main jail.

The entertainment district is currently receiving its kickstart, around 10th & K.
2 0
REPLY
January 17, 2010 | 2:48 PM
ARCO can be exapnded outward and upward using the existing structure enhanced with new superstructure for a build out.

You clearly have never engaged in rehabbing, renovation, or retrofitting buildings...

Apart from that, your 'analysis' is merely ephemeral and aesthetic at best, at a time when we can't afford gold plated doilies for sport...
1 0
REPLY
January 17, 2010 | 12:56 PM
You have no such accurate remembrance of a country you have driven through,
as you gain by riding a bicycle. --Ernest Hemingway, 'Battle for Paris',
1944

I like the idea of people coming to the stadium by foot,bike and train.
2 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background