Tag Cloud
Viewing thru of
The Natomas Chamber of Commerce today criticized the NBA and Maloofs for backing an arena plan weeks before the Sacramento First task force is scheduled to make its recommendations to Mayor Kevin Johnson and the public.
In a statment released today, chamber officials announced plans to launch a "Keep The Arena In Natomas" campaign during a press conference set for 11 a.m. Saturday at Five Star Way and Del Paso Road. The chamber is a partner in the Natomas ESC group which presented a proposal at City Hall yesterday for an arena and entertainment complex on 100 city-owned acres located north of Arco Arena.
"Natomas needs representation in the discussion about where a new sports complex should be located," said Marni Leger, a chamber board member and "Keep the Arena in Natomas" campaign chairperson.
Chamber officials said they were disappointed in the NBA and Maloofs who yesterday announced support for a plan that would involve complex land swaps and relocating the State fairgrounds onto the current arena site in Natomas. The 12-person Sacramento First task force has yet to fully review all seven proposals put forth by developers and is not scheduled to make a recommendation until March 11.
Said Leger, "In tight times, the more economical proposal to build a new arena in Natomas should be considered."
As for downtown density, this is an amenity??? The downtown needs housing -- not an arena...
Keep the new arena in Natomas.
1) You can't expand to add another level of luxury boxes (all arenas these days have 2 rows of luxury boxes - they bring in the most revenue)
2) The walls of Arco are only so wide. The already slim concourse around the arena can't possibly be expanded without knocking down 2 walls and a roof.
3) The dressing rooms for entertainers (whether they are Britney Spears of the Kings) are already way small.
4) The pipes for icemaking are laid in concrete and need to be ripped up
In essence, you'd have to knock down 2 walls and a roof to do this, and you're basically starting over. The Kings would have to play in Oakland for 3 years or Memorial Auditorium (which seats maybe 3000), which would kill revenue. We don't have the luxury of having old arenas nearby.
I'm not sure where people get this "least cost" option. None of this takes in to consideration that you don't want to pay for it either - you'd rather shoot down a great plan that's paid for.
As for downtown needing housing - it already has housing. Not sure you have been to downtown on a weekend or weekday night lately but it's a ghost town (everyone is in midtown). It needs something to kickstart an entertainment district.
The Railyards is where it needs to be. It's next to the train stations, right off the freeway, and oh yeah... it's paid for.
The entertainment district is currently receiving its kickstart, around 10th & K.
You clearly have never engaged in rehabbing, renovation, or retrofitting buildings...
Apart from that, your 'analysis' is merely ephemeral and aesthetic at best, at a time when we can't afford gold plated doilies for sport...
as you gain by riding a bicycle. --Ernest Hemingway, 'Battle for Paris',
1944
I like the idea of people coming to the stadium by foot,bike and train.