STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

The union that represents Sacramento police officers is supporting Mayor Kevin Johnson’s “strong mayor” initiative, saying it would give the mayor the power to guarantee sufficient public safety funding.

Meanwhile, Bill Camp, the plaintiff who challenged the initiative in a Dec. 1 lawsuit, said a strong mayor form of government could lead to job insecurity for police department employees who are not represented by unions. Camp is the executive secretary of the Sacramento Central Labor Council. He filed the lawsuit as a private citizen.

Sacramento residents will vote on the initiative on June 10. The initiative would give the mayor many new powers and would change the city’s existing council/manager form of government.

The Sacramento Police Officers Association said in a Jan. 10 press release that more than 1,100 police officers, dispatchers and department staff are union members.

“A mayor in Sacramento under this structure of government will have the authority to ensure appropriate levels of funding for public safety, which translates into safer streets for our police officers and citizens,” SPOA President Brent Meyer said in the news release.

Meyer could not be reached by phone Monday afternoon.

A strong mayor in Sacramento would have the ability to hire and fire as many as 800 city employees that are not represented by unions, according to the city’s Charter Review Committee, which studied the strong mayor system of government.

Camp noted that the mayor's hiring and firing powers would extend to unrepresented members of the police department. He argued that a future mayor — not Johnson — could abuse his or her firing authority.

The strong mayor initiative “does not build clean politics,” Camp said.

By contrast, Meyer said in the press release that the strong mayor system would “hold all elected officials more accountable to their constituency.”

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

edited on  January 11, 2010 | 8:39 PM
Well I guess our mayor has found his true profession-- the oldest profession -- PIMPIN and PANDERING - it should be a crime- oh wait i think it is unless you are a poverty pimp

Public safety ?? or one hand (mayor) washes the other (union)
8 5
REPLY
January 11, 2010 | 8:58 PM
Why do I feel uneasy about all these measures that are designed for "public safety" ?

I don't feel safe having a mayor that is so strong that he doesn't have to answer to the people. Nestle' Waters comes to mind.

Look out for full-body scanners at airports. You will not be safe from cancer causing radiation! I doubt it will have any affect on terrorism either.

The Patriot Act doesn't make me feel safe.

Oh well, the list goes on & on....
7 5
REPLY
edited on  January 11, 2010 | 11:42 PM
I agree with your post. Heck, we should feel uneasy since they are not designed for public safety but sought for and designed for career advancement and departmental enhancements - politics and greed.

I want people in our communities safe and I want officers safe who have to work in areas of neglect where hopelessness translates into lawlessness - but the fact of the matter is, we can't arrest away crime and as Benjamin Franklin once said, "the definition of insanity is to continuously do the same thing over and over and expect different results" our mayor appears to be threading on insanity.

Heck, he has homeland security funding for cameras... federal funding I think 6 million for additional officers and he wants 3 more million for additional officers- As always he's so busy looking at unions and those who can help him advance his career he CONTINUOUSLY fails to see the people in communities exposed and affected by crime. He's not looking at public safety- Public safety takes a back seat to his political desires. Mayor Johnson is not a dove of peace. He's appearing to be a vulture circling over our dead to advance his political career. Shameful
5 4
REPLY
January 11, 2010 | 11:17 PM
There is no Democratic power that can guarantee funding for any public service. However, since the Strong Mayor initiative is not Democratic then maybe it can.

3 4
REPLY
January 11, 2010 | 11:31 PM
A coup d'etat requires the support of the military to be achieved.

How much did the police dept. pony up for that "Walker Texas Ranger" styled Yukon that they schelpt KJ around in. Wasn't this the guy that portrayed the former mayor in a negative light when they drove her around, in her own car because it was a waste of public safety money?

Remember when RE used to ask the Questions before being on the mayor's staff at 80K?

"Question is who's going to pay for Kevin's taxi? The chauffer service uses retired cops and costs about $67,000 per year. The police department's broke, and the city's pushing towards insolvency. The only person who seems to have money at City Hall is Kevin. It's good to be the king."

From KOVR's the scoop by RE Graswich

http://cbs13.com/thescoop/The.Scoop.KJ.2.889093.html
5 3
REPLY
January 11, 2010 | 11:49 PM
I'm confused ... why is this news? The SPOA has supported the initiative all along. They were listed as supporters on the SAG website months ago ...
8 1
REPLY
January 12, 2010 | 6:26 AM
The cops have enabled the coverups of allegations of child sexual abuse by KJ by thwarting any investigation into their internal process, even with redacted documentation. There's something more sinister lurking in all of this, and though we may never find out, it does compel suspicion about any move the SacPD makes, especially as it has aligned, and continues to align, with this mayor and this authoritarian SMI measure. Cops like despotic regimes as a rule -- small wonder they would support the SMI...
5 4
REPLY
January 12, 2010 | 7:41 AM
The cops, to their credit, took their salary hit early on during the budget crisis and played ball with the mayor and council. No big surprise here.
4 1
REPLY
January 12, 2010 | 11:00 AM
No disrespect intended but many city employees (Including Park & Rec workers) were unable to play ball - they weren't thrown a life-line to keep their jobs- and took their hits early on and continue to do so. Why is it important Mayor Johnson looks after all city employees and not just LE? Because- in the words of LA Father Boyle - nothing stops a bullet like a job- unemployment increases- crime increases.... I agree with fifthgensacramentan the only person who seems to have money at city hall is Kevin Johnson and I will add the only people he appears to guarantee money is SPOA and to heck with anyone else. Public Safety does go beyond law enforcement
3 3
REPLY
January 12, 2010 | 7:57 AM
Sacramento is currently the second most dangerous city in the State of California. In spite of this, Sacramento allocates a smaller percentage of its general fund to public safety than any other major city.

A mayor with the authority to propose a budget could allocate an additional $3MM dollars to hire 30 more additional police officers.
3 7
REPLY
edited on  January 12, 2010 | 11:21 AM
Ronald West-Your comment resonates a similar mind set exhibited by kerryjustin1 on sacbee with regards to the arena proposal...and I quote

"kerryjustin1's Comments on: Sacramento mayor vs. mall owner: No deal yet at 12/16/2009 11:51 AM PST on The Sacramento Bee
Strong Mayor could unilaterally order the city manager to clear red tape for developers to create much-needed jobs and to fast-track, downtown revitalization projects."

Scary, especially if true, should the SMI pass.

Why else would the BOSS MAYOR Initiative been crafted in such a way to have all four charter officers serve at the pleasure of the mayor?

Where's the checks & balances you and the other $upporters claim?
5 2
REPLY
edited on  January 12, 2010 | 10:45 AM
RON, When a 16yr old boy shot and killed a Sheriff Dept an entire neighborhood was closed off with law enforcement from SPD officers, SSD deputies, CHP, West SacPd, EGPD, Rancho Cordova PD, Regional Transit PD, Sheriff Security Officers, UCDavis PD, North Sac PD, DOJ, DEA, SWAT, Folsom PD, in fact law enforcement was turned away due to SO many branches of law enforcement and multi-jurdisdictional task force arriving at the scene. In spite of this the boy got away from the scene riding off on the lightrail to Meadowview.... Truth be told we have plenty of officers and can have the assistance of many branches of LE from surrounding areas...

Quite frankly the more officers - the more union dues- the more political clout and influence over the budget the union has. This is not about Public Safety it is about politics and greed. It's about KJ wanting SMP and a union wanting more dues...

In 2005 written in RE Grashwich column,. in response to crime in New Orleans due to Hurricane Katrina former SPD Chief Najera stated, "it couldn't hapen here in Sacramento, we are prepared..." Sacramento is prepared for massive crime due to a disaster but you think they are not prepared for a killing a week or every other week?? When a shoplifter was accused of having a gun in Florin Walmart the streets were sealed off for blocks- it was SCARY- helicopters, K-9, officers on the street corner with guns as long as my arm directing traffic away from Florin Rd. It was unbelievable (and no gun was found...) IN SPITE OF THIS, with all the little areas breaking off to form their own city the city of Sac should allocate a smaller percentage of its general fund to more officers... FYI, and perhaps you should tell your also clueless brother- the Mayor- that Public Safety goes beyond saturating the streets with officers and PERHAPS he should look for millions to place resources, opportunities, employment... in neighborhoods of neglect to keep the people safe and the officers patrolling the areas safe. In LA their was a crime wave (when factories shut down) and the people demanded more officers and they got them and the crime increased dramatically with unemployment and self-fulfilling prophecy whereas the people were treated like criminals and began to behave more and more like criminals. Sacramento is not going forward in public safety we are going backwards looking to arrest away a crime when other cities are also putting significant efforts in resources not just attempting to ignorantly arrest away crime (but our Mayor can't see the forest through the trees. With Johnson's vision the people will perish and unions will thrive.
4 4
REPLY
January 12, 2010 | 11:04 AM
fifthgensacramentan- I LOVE YOUR POSTS! You provide excellent information. Thank you
4 4
REPLY
edited on  January 12, 2010 | 11:29 AM
With a bit of luck, Sacramento will be the next Vallejo and file for municipal bankruptcy.

check out: http://www.savelocalservices.com/
http://www.saveyourcity.net/index.cfm
2 2
REPLY
edited on  January 12, 2010 | 2:56 PM
This is merely using scare tactics by a politician who is to trying to force his will upon his constituents. The "public safety" threat, (like the Bush administration's use of terrorism and the current administration's use of economic collapse), are just means towards a power grab. When a politician says that the only way to solve a problem is to expand their power in a very specific and expansive way, I say WATCH OUT.
4 3
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background