STORYLINE Weekly Reflections From Philosophy Night

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

       There are those who believe that taking an interest in fashion is essentially unethical. They feel it leads to such vices as vanity and materialism, and that it breaks society into classes, the fashionable and the unfashionable. Although I do agree that if the fashionable are not careful such undesirable effects might occur, it does not seem accurate to suggest that they must. Indeed, if it is used wisely, I believe fashion can bring many positive things to our lives as well. The question is, how do we use fashion wisely?
       People tend to look up to those with a sense of style. The fashionable are often perceived as successful, popular, and even intelligent, placing them in a position of power over those who look up to them. Many of us know what it feels like to catch the glance of someone admiring our personal style, but the way we respond in such situations is what defines how each one of us actually uses fashion. Do we lift our chin, avert our gaze, and play superior, or do we use our unique circumstance to make eye contact, smile, and lift the spirits of a stranger? The ethics of fashion, as far as I see them, revolve in large part around whether we use the influence that having a sense of style can give us to empower other people, or to empower ourselves at their expense.
       Another element of this issue involves the way in which having a sense of style can impact the stylish directly. General issues surrounding retail therapy and excessive spending aside, there is a deeper layer to this as well. I imagine that most of us have had the experience of being in a wonderful conversation, when sparks are flying and time is beginning to stand still, yet all of the sudden some trivial thought about the way we look pops into our heads. Perhaps we briefly doubt whether we’ve chosen the right shirt for the occasion. In one minute we seem to be experiencing all of the goodness in the universe, then in a flash of self-consciousness we become distracted and even insecure. This chain of events represents one of the subtle impacts that maintaining a sense of style can have. If we’re not careful, being fashionable can make us self-conscious.
       But being stylish does not have to have these effects. I believe it can serve as a playful means of engaging in artistic creation, not for the sake of acquiring admiration, but for the joy of creativity and the love of inspiration. We might play with fashion because we value the creative process in our lives. We might pick out our clothing with the same sensitivity and creative energy we call upon to write a song or paint a painting. Furthermore, we might value the idea of adding something beautiful to the world, or serving as a muse for those around us.
       There are many sound reasons why one might take an interest in fashion. However, if we wish to experience all of the good things that fashion can bring, and avoid all of the trouble, we must determine to use our style wisely, and dress for the right reasons. For as it is with power in general, the influence that can arise from maintaining a sense of style can be used to bring beauty and goodness to the world, but it can also be used to take that goodness away.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

December 28, 2008 | 8:49 PM
I appreciate your fashion 'rundown' (confession, 'rundown' is an apt descriptor of my own fashion sense at times). For the record, I don't parade around in my sweats half the time to either contribute or deplete goodness in the world. It is about the drawstring! But there is good news! To their credit, my son and daughter, both mid- twenties, are living examples of the "philanthropic phashionistas" you praise in your article. Sporting their individualized clothing styles, they don't 'play superior', rather, they inspire me. I suspect I am am not the only benefactor of their willingness to USE fashion for the sole purpose of eliciting JOY!
Cheryl
1 0
REPLY
December 31, 2008 | 3:20 AM
Thanks for your input Cheryl. That's a great term, "philanthropic phashionista"!
0 0
REPLY
Dan
Author thumbnail
December 29, 2008 | 8:07 AM
"Unethical"? Who are these people who find fashion unethical, unless you're only talking about blood diamonds and fur coats. I think you mean "superficial".

In any case, can you name any of these pieces of fashion that might inspire others to greater things? I think many believe that fashion is more of a way to separate the poor from the rich; i.e. the people who have to spend proportionately more money on paying their mortgage and food bills versus those who can spend money on maintaining their personal style for others to see. This is kind of an odd essay to write during a depression.
0 0
REPLY
December 29, 2008 | 10:40 AM
I think you may have answered your own question. Some believe that fashion as a way to separate rich and poor is unethical.
0 0
REPLY
December 31, 2008 | 3:17 AM
"The ethics of fashion, as far as I see them, revolve in large part around whether we use the influence that having a sense of style can give us to empower other people, or to empower ourselves at their expense". This is the sense in which I mean "unethical".
Also, I didn't exactly say that our sense of fashion can inspire people to do "greater things", I said it can help us lift peoples spirits (if they happen to look up to us do to our sense of fashion) and it can serve as an artistic inspiration, like a home-made painting. I also said it could make the world a more beautiful place.
I would agree with William that style does not have to cost much, so I don't consider this an inappropriate essay to write during a depression, although I can understand why that would be strange otherwise.
0 0
REPLY
December 29, 2008 | 8:34 AM
High fashion takes most of its cues from what people who shop mostly at thrift stores (or, at best, secondhand shops and clearance sales) are wearing.

There's fashion and then there's style. Fashionable people pay big money to copy what stylish people buy at thrift stores, or make at home. Rough economic times tend to be bad for fashion (because people can't afford expensive stuff) but good for style.
1 0
REPLY
December 29, 2008 | 10:41 AM
I have a good friend who shops at thrift stores and closeouts only.

He is also the best dressed guy I've ever met.

Style for the win!
2 0
REPLY
December 29, 2008 | 12:45 PM
Style and fashion can be tyrannical, when wielded as a weapon to enhance one's own sense of superiority - that's partly what Stuart is saying, I think. That's what I got from reading it, but then, I just got a gift from two very close, style-conscious friends who gave me a bike jersey for Xmas, with the comment that it was as much for them as for me, so they didn't have to look at my own recently-purchased bike jersey, similar to the one they gave me in all but color (they went brown; I roll in RED).
When my girlfriend added that my jersey makes me look not only gay, but like Freddie Mercury, I failed to see the problem. I was a big Queen fan. But my point is this: It all feels very judgmental, and that's what I don't understand. Why all the judgment around what other people wear?
Stuart's comments about how one might use fashion as a way of connecting, rather than competing, struck a chord. It's why I love Burning Man so much: People are there to admire the way others dress, with a generosity of spirit that I find lacking in "real world" fashion and its opinionated adherents. I dress as well as I can pull together, often lazily, but I don't see it as a measure of who I am; others obviously feel differently. And that's disappointing.
And it's why I always complement people, male or female, who dress well. It is also why I would never insult the way other people dress.
On the other hand, I love the new shirt. AND the old one...
1 0
REPLY
edited on  December 30, 2008 | 4:44 PM
I like burg's veblenian distinction between productive style and emulatory fashion, but it skirts the issue at stake. Campbell's argument is unsound. Fashion is a sign system whose various meanings transcend the intentions of the individual. There is only so much fine-tuning a fashionista can do to his or her style to make it conform to his or her ethical ideals. On the major issues, such as consumerism and invidious comparison , he or she can affect nothing. Fashion will always support consumerist values. Fashion will always create in-groups and out-groups.
0 0
REPLY
December 31, 2008 | 2:46 AM
I see what your getting at, and it's a good point. It's true that fashion is a sign or symbol system whose meanings transcend the intentions of the individual. But I am not saying that one's clothing, or choice of symbols, can lift the spirits of another all by itself (although it may serve as an artistic inspiration on it's own). It is one's kindness that can lift the spirits of another. It just so happens that people tend to interpret the sign system in such a way as to look up to those with a sense of style, and this place the stylish in a potential position of power over their admirers. With this power, as is the case with all power over sentient beings, one can put into practice ones ethical ideals.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background